Perspectives of the Nativity

Whom
say ye that I am?Matthew 16:15
On December 25
the Christian world will celebrate the birthday of Jesus
of Nazareth. Despite the fact
that the date chosen is arbitrary and out of accord with
the gospel records, we rejoice that so many still desire
to honor in some way the one who came to save men from
their sins. Although the holiday has become polluted by
crass commercialism, it remains aday set aside by the
sincere to acknowledge that Jesus was indeed the Son of
God. Therefore we are glad, in keeping with the spirit of
the holiday, to join in this celebration by dedicating
this issue of THE HERALD to this marvelous and
miraculous birth.
Even though the
parents of Jesus were of the poorer working class, the
birth of Christ was witnessed by a surprising number of
quite different individuals. Each one had his own unique
perspective of the significance of that birth. In this
issue of the journal we will examine the different
impressions of these witnesses.
No two people see the same event exactly alike. It may be
their physical angle of sight or some personal bias or
prejudice that brings them to different conclusions on
the details of what they saw. This phenomenon occurs in
courtrooms when jurors listen to witnesses reporting
their impressions of the case in hand. We will be
examining the viewpoints of eight individuals or groups
in the articles that follow.
No viewpoint is more important or more precisely accurate
than that of God himself. In Gods Journey to
Bethlehem the author seeks to enter into
the mind of the Almighty Creator of the universe and
establish his particular viewpoint of the nativity. God,
the giver of every good and perfect gift (James 1:17),
gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever
believeth on him should not perish, but have everlasting
life (John 3:16). It is almost presumptuous to
attempt to enter into the mind and heart of God, but it
is good to contemplate the feelings of a loving parent
who voluntarily submitted his dearest possession to
experiences he knew Jesus would undergo.
Among the first to be aware of the birth of the Lord,
even before the event, were his relatives Elizabeth and
Zacharias. Elizabeth prophesied of the coming event to
Mary, while Zacharias referred to it on the occasion of
the naming of his only son, John the Baptist. Their
unique perspective is treated in the article entitled The
Torah of Humanity.
Naturally, no one on earth was more acutely aware of the
blessed event than the parents themselves, particularly
Mary. In Blessed Among Women, the perspective of Mary
and Joseph is reviewedthe angelic announcements,
the trip to visit Elizabeth, and the final journey to
Bethlehem, where Jesus was born.
The witnesses to the birth of Jesus were not only
Hebrews, but also wise men, or magi, who came from the
east. They were following a guiding star. They warned the
family in Bethlehem of impending danger and their
precious gifts may have provided sustenance for the
family while in Egypt. Their visit is analyzed in the
article The Guiding Star.
Not all were thrilled at the prospect of a newborn king.
Those in positions of power never relish the thought of
their power being threatened. A prime example of this is
the Edomite King in Judea, Herod the Great. The
Jealous Monarch seeks the perspective Herod may
have had when he heard from the wise men that a new king
was born in Israel.
The birth of the Messiah had been long anticipated. There
was an expectation for his birth at the time (Luke 3:15).
Two faithful elderly people in Jerusalem frequented the
temple in anticipation of the Messiah, praying for the
consolation of Israel (Luke 2:25). Their
names were Simeon and Anna and their story is narrated in
the treatise, Jesus Presented at the Temple.
Two regular features are included in our celebration of
the birth of Jesus. The Echoes from the Past
is a reprint of The Question Box from 1962 by
Bro. P. L. Read, a former editor of this journal. The
concluding treatise is our verse by verse study in Isaiah
53 entitled Despised and Rejected.
|