GLOSSOLALIA

 

What Are Its Implications?

 

Chapter 1

 

No Christian can ignore the many questions raised by the phenomenal growth of "glossolalia" or "speaking in tongues." The Pentecostal denominations, which had their start at the turn of this century, now claim membership of over 2,000,000. Their ranks have swelled largely at the expense of the other denominations. Now in the past twelve years the charismatic movement has deeply infiltrated the historic Protestant churches. Even the heavily guarded precincts of Catholicism have not been spared. "Born-again Catholics who speak in tongues are not uncommon today. Then, of course, there are the "Jesus People" and the charismatic fellowships springing up on college campuses across the nation.

 

All have a common complaint, namely, the stagnation and hollowness of the mainline denominations which have stifled the working of the holy Spirit in the hearts of believers. Hence, there has been a mass exodus from these churches and also an inner revolt against the clergymen as these sincere Christians seek to experience the realities of the Christian life. Bible Students sympathize with this disenchantment over churchianity.

 

In 2Ti 3:1-5, the Apostle Paul listed the perilous conditions in the world that mark the end of the Age.

 

2Ti 3:5 describes the masses of professed Christians today, "Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof," to which Paul adds, "from such turn away."

 

Actually Bible Students were the first in this exodus from churchianity. Shortly before the turn of the century they heeded the words of Re 18:1-4 and left the worldly churches of Babylon. Congregations of Bible Students continue to form throughout the world.

 

Completely independent of other Bible Students congregations or any man-made headship of Christ and the unstifled working of the holy Spirit in their hearts.

 

As a result they experience the realities of the Christian life at the end of the Age.

 

There are hazards in fleeing clerical authority. The Christianís wily foe, Satan, stands ready to divert a good thing. There must be a final authority to which each, standing free in Christ, can turn. This authority cannot be an inner experience only, as it would render us vulnerable to Satan. It is disheartening to find some Christians who place their "charismatic experience" above Scripture. We trust these are the exceptions.

 

Thank God, there is an absolute authority, the Bible, which is to govern and regulate every aspect of the Christian life. (2Ti 3:16-17; 2:15) Because we are concerned we raise the following Scriptural points relative to speaking with tongues.

New Testament Criteria for Glossolalia

 

Glossolalia, a Greek word that simply means tongues-speaking or speaking with tongues, was one of the miraculous gifts (Greek: charisma) of the spirit prevalent in the Church during the time of the Apostles. Many feel the holy Spirit is again miraculously bestowing the charisma of tongues on Christians. Glossolalia today generally takes the form of ecstatic, unintelligible utterances. The question of whether tongues-speaking as used in the Scriptures was ecstatic utterances or foreign languages will be considered in detail subsequently.

 

Speaking with tongues in the early Church had limited practical value. Therefore, the Apostle Paul saw the need of laying down certain rules governing the use of this gift of the Spirit in the Church. These rules are found in 1 Corinthians 14. If contemporary glossolalia is a blessing of the Lord, we would naturally expect it to function in accordance with these rules.

 

1.1Co 14:5, 27, 28. Tongues-speaking is only edifying in the Church if it is interpreted. "But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the Church." Note from the context that Paul includes both speaking and praying in tongues in this rule.

 

Most tongues-speaking today is not interpreted as enjoined by Paul.

 

2.1Co 14:22. "Tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not."

 

The tendency of glossolalia Christians today is to impress fellow Christian believers with the need to being "Spirit-filled." Yet the Apostle said this gift was to be used primarily as a sign to unbelievers. The fact that the current usage of tongues largely ignores these two basic New Testament rules tends to cause this version of glossolalia to be suspect in the minds of many sincere Christians.

How Important is Glossolalia?

 

It is interesting to note how the New Testament ranks tongues-speaking as to its importance. In the 12 th chapter of 1 Corinthians (1Co 12) the Apostle Paul deals with the diversities of operations of the holy Spirit in the Church.

 

Then he lists the gifts of the Spirit according to their importance. (1Co 12:28). And what do we find at the bottom of the list? Speaking with tongues! Yet our charismatic friends seem to have a different sequence of importance today with glossolalia on or near the top.

 

1Co 12:29-30 reveals that not all faithful Christians in the apostlesí day were to expect to speak in tongues. Yet today many feel glossolalia is the badge of a Spirit-filled Christian.

 

The unwarranted premium placed on glossolalia today is reflected in an article which appeared in the February 28, 1975 issue of Christianity Today. The article entitled "A Plea to Some Who Speak in Tongues" was written by a pastor who opened the doors of his church to "both those who speak in tongues and those who do not." The following quotation contains some of his disappointments: "Professing to be filled with the Spirit of humility and holiness, these persons expressed the opposite. The subtle but real spiritual conceit became more apparent until the words ĎSpirit-filledí came to have a regrettable taint. Other pastors with whom I have talked have had similar experiences. There is often a Ďknow-it-allí attitude among those who speak in tongues that exactly contradicts what they protest in testimony. They definitely give the impression that those who do not speak in tongues have not Ďarrivedí spiritually, do not have the sensitivity to interpret the Scriptures, do not have prayer power that can bring results. These persons are insensitive to the concept of Christian discipline. In many of them, habits of worldliness remain while the tongues-speaking flourishes. They are unteachable.

 

Again the spiritual superiority complex rears its ugly head. The tongues-speakers apparently believe that they know it all."

 

It is hoped that the extremes mentioned in this article are only characteristic of a minority. However, the article does reflect the unscriptural importance attached to glossolalia today. Disconcerting things are heard in charismatic circles, such as; non-charismatic Christians are not to be raptured but left to endure the "seven-year tribulation." Another example is the following quotation from an address given at the Presbyterian Charismatic.Conference by George MacLeod, former moderator of the Church of Scotland and member of the House of Lords.

 

"Only the charismatic communion in all denominations can hear all that God is saying in this age of the Spirit."

 

Again this may be the view of a minority. Nevertheless, these extremes are symptomatic of the charged atmosphere of partisanship in the Pentecostal and neo-Pentecostal movements indicating a consensus that only glossolalic Christians are "Spirit-filled." An unwillingness by charismatics to accept that speaking with tongues was the lowest operation of the Spirit in the Church (1Co 12:28) and that non-glossolalic Christians can be equally "Spirit-filled" (1Co 12:30) cast serious doubt on this practice being an operation of the holy Spirit.

Miraculous Gifts in the Early Church

 

In 1Co 12-14, Paul uses the term "spiritual gifts" in describing the miraculous gifts such as tongues and healing. A revealing statement concerning the purpose of these "spiritual gifts" is also made by the Apostle Paul in Ro 1:11, "That I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established." Note the phrase "ye may be established."

 

Remember the New Testament had not yet been given.

 

Evidently the miraculous gifts of the Spirit were necessary at the critical juncture to establish the faith of the Church until the Bible had been completed. Further, the Church of Christ as a completely new operation in the plan of God required more tangible manifestations of its validity. The miraculous gifts provided this confirmatory evidence for the Church at its inception.

 

But the gifts became superfluous (1Co 13:8) after the Church had been established and the canon of the inspired writings had been completed. The Scriptures, the Apostle declares, are sufficient, "that the man of God may be thoroughly furnished unto all good works." 2Ti 3:17

 

A distinction must be made between the spiritual gifts and the gift of the holy Spirit" promised to all believers in Ac 2:38. The Greek word for gift in Ac 2:38 is Dorea not Charisma. Dorea is any gratuity, but Charisma, when related to the holy Spirit, denotes a miraculous power.

 

Therefore, Ac 2:38 cannot be used to prove that all believers down through the age would receive miraculous gifts. It is interesting to note how the gifts (Greek-charisma) were initiated in the Church and how they were to cease.

 

The gifts were conferred only by the apostles; however, there were two notable exceptions. These two exceptions occurred at the time of the baptism of the holy Spirit.

 

The one baptism of the holy Spirit (Ac 1:5) came upon the Church in two steps-both of which were indelibly marked by the miraculous manifestation of speaking in tongues. The first was on the Day of Pentecost, ten days after Jesusí ascension. The waiting disciples were baptized with the holy Spirit. How did they or anyone else know this nucleus of the Church received the holy Spirit? This significant event was indelibly marked in history by the phenomenon of tongues which accompanied the receiving of the Spirit. As a result, the Jews from many foreign lands gathered at Jerusalem for the holy days, heard the Gospel preached in their won language or tongue. Ac 2:1-11

 

The second step in the baptism of the holy Spirit occurred 3 and a half years later. It was the historic event of the first gentile, Cornelius, and his household coming into the Church. This notable event was also stamped indelibly for history with the miraculous speaking of tongues. (Ac 10:44-47) Ac 11:15 confirms that the Day of Pentecost outpouring of the holy Spirit, accompanied by tongues, only occurred again at the conversion of Cornelius. Ac 1:5, and Ac 11:16-17 are the only Scriptures that mention the baptism of the holy Spirit. They limit this baptism to the Day of Pentecost and the conversion of Cornelius. All other scriptural accounts of gifts reveal that they came not as a baptism from the Lord but now could only be conveyed through the Apostles. (Gal 3:5; Ac 4:19-21, 29-31; Ac 19:1-6) This is further confirmed by Ro 1:11

 

At the writing of Paulís letter to the Romans none of the apostles had visited Rome. From Ro 1:11 we find that the Church at Rome had not yet received spiritual gifts. This was one of the reasons Paul desired to visit them-thus confirming that gifts could not come by prayer alone but only through the ministry of the apostles.

 

Simon Magus, though given a miraculous gift by the Apostle Peter, was reprimanded for trying to but this apostolic power of conferring gifts. Ac 8:17-23 When did the exercising of these gifts cease? If the gifts could only be conveyed by the apostles, then when they died the gifts ceased with the death of those Christians who had received these gifts from the apostles.

Chapter 2 TONGUES SHALL CEASE

 

1Co 13:8 contrasts tongues and other gifts with love, and states tongues shall cease but love will never fail. Our charismatic friends say, Yes tongues will cease when the Church is caught up with Christ. But notice 1Co 13:13, "And now abideth faith, hope, love, these three, but the greatest of these is love. " Regardless of how we interpret 1Co 13:9-12, verse 13 (1Co 13:13) tells us that faith, hope and love abide after something ceases. And the only thing that cease in Paulís discussion are the tongues and gifts of 1Co 13:8. After tongues and the other gifts of 1Co 13:8 cease, then faith hope and love abide or continue on. There is a time that faith and hope will exist after tongues and the other gifts cease. How long will faith and hope last? Until the Church is united with Christ in the first resurrection. Then there will be no need. Faith and hope will end in the reality of being with Christ. Therefore tongues must cease sometime before the Churchís history on earth ends.

 

First Corinthians 13 is crucial to our subject and warrants a more detailed consideration. In 1Co 13:1-3 Paul shows that the exercising of any gift or service for God is worthless unless it is prompted by love. Then in co 13:4-8 he lists all the beautiful qualities of love. In 1Co 13:8 Paul lists the last quality of love, "love never faileth," and uses it to show the transitoriness of the gifts by contrast.

 

1Co 13:8 reads: "Love never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away." Paul is referring back to the miraculous gifts of prophecy, tongues, knowledge in 1 Corinthians 12 and reveals they are only temporary.

 

1Co 13:9-10 -"For we know in part, and we prophecy in pary. But when they which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away."

 

Some Pentecostals apply this phrase "when that which is perfect is come" to the return of Jesus to take his Church.

 

But note these two points. (1) The Greek word for "that" is definitely an impersonal pronoun which cannot apply to a personality. (2) The whole construction of this verse in the Greek defines a growth from the partial or incomplete to perfection or completion and not the return or coming of something which is already perfect.

 

The Greek word here translated "perfect" is often translated "complete" elsewhere in the New Testament. Our perfection at our resurrection change is referred to by the phrase, "when that which is perfect is come."

 

Even the miraculous gifts of knowledge and prophecy in this life are but partial or incomplete compared to the complete or perfect knowledge and vision of eternity that will be ours when we are joined with Christ.

 

1Co 13:9-10 show a contrast between this life and eternity. Then in verses 11 and 12 (1Co 13:9-10), Paul makes a contrast between childhood and maturity in the Church of his day and designated tongues as the mark of childhood.

 

1Co 13:11, "When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things." Here we may conclude that Paul associates tongues with the childhood stage in the Church. This is confirmed by a parallel statement of Paul in 1Co 14:19, 20 where Paul call those who speak in the Church in tongues, without interpretation, as children in their thinking. And even though the Church was to pass out of its childhood stage of gifts, maturity now is only a glimpse of the perfection to be had at our resurrection change.

 

1Co 13:12, "For now [even in maturity] we see through a glass darkly; but then face to face; now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known."

 

1Co 13:13, "And now abideth faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love." After the childhood stage of tongues and other miraculous gifts cease, the developmental qualities of the spirit, faith, hope and love will sustain the Church until her resurrection change at the end of the age. These qualities are of a more enduring nature, thereby enabling the Church to withstand the trials and besetments of the age.

 

Note again that the faith, hope and love of 1Co 13:13 endures after something ceases. And the only thing that ceases in 1 Corinthians 13 are tongues and the other gifts as mentioned in verse 8. Therefore, there is a period in which faith and hope will continue after tongues and the other gifts cease.

 

Some apply verses 9-12 of 1 Corinthians 13 (1Co 13:9-12) to the completion of the Bible. The thought expressed is that the Church knew in part and prophesied in part (1Co 13:9) until that which is perfect is come; that is, the Bible is finally complete (1Co 13:10). Then the childhood stage of gifts is over (1Co 13:11). But even having the Bible complete is a partial knowledge compared with the resurrection change (1Co 13:12). Whatever the merits of this application of 1Co 13:9-13 this much is certain, gifts are mentioned in the book of Acts and 1 Corinthians. Traces of the gifts are found in the earlier epistles to the Romans, the Galatians, the Ephesians. However, there is no mention of them in the later epistles of 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, 1 and 2 Peter and Johnís epistles. This is significant. The New Testament writings are being circulated. Doctrinal truths, the abiding graces of faith, hope and love are what the apostles exhort the Church to rest on rather than the exceptional gifts. The tongues as foretold in 1Co 13:8 were already in the process of ceasing in the apostlesí day.

Chapter 3 FOREIGN LANGUAGES OR ECSTATIC UTTERANCES

 

Most glossolatists agree that the tongue-speaking recorded in Ac 2:6-11 refers to speaking in foreign languages as 1Co 13:8-11 clearly state. When the disciples received the holy Spirit at Pentecost, they spoke in foreign tongues. What was the result? Jews, gathered in Jerusalem from many lands, heard the Gospel in their own languages. Tongues-speaking today is not in foreign languages. Rather it takes the form of exstatic unintelligible utterances and it is claimed that the speaking in tongues discussed in chapters 12-14 of 1 Corinthians refers not to the foreign languages of Ac 2:6-11, but to ecstatic utterances.

 

Babel Reversed

 

Unintelligible ecstatic utterances miss the basic Scriptural logic for the gift of tongues. Tongues-speaking in foreign languages was Bable reversed.

 

Ge 11:1-9 reveals that as the human race was repopulating after the Noahian flood, they still spoke one language. Instead of migrating throughout the earth, mankind alienated from God, concentrated together to build the city of Babel with its tower to reach unto heaven. What a monument this would be to manís united ability. But from Godís perspective it was a monument of sinful manís unity to perform every evil imagination. (Ge 11:5; Ro 1:21) For their won eternal welfare it was better that they be scattered abroad to minimize the leavening effect of sin upon each other. To accomplish this, God "confound[ed] their [one] language, that they may not understand one anotherís speech." (Ge 11:7) This was the beginning of diversified languages..Becoming foreigners to each other resulted in their migrating throughout the earth. It was detrimental for man to dwell together in his sinful condition.

 

The picture changed when Jesus died to redeem sinful man. This good news (the word Gospel means good news) was now ready to be proclaimed to all the world.

 

But there was a language barrier. God by the gift of tongues bridged the language barrier invoked at Babel.

 

Now this message of reconciliation could be proclaimed to all nations. Faithful Christians evangelized the Roman World by means of the gift of tongues, the ability to speak in foreign languages, until there was a sufficient number of Christians to conduct this witness by less miraculous operations of the holy Spirit. This whole scriptural logic of Babel, and Babel bridged for the proclamation of the Gospel, is lost if tongues-speaking is unintelligible syllables.

 

If the gift of tongues today is ecstatic utterances, what a waste. For as Harold Lindsell observed in a Christianity Today article, "there is no known case in which a missionary received the gift of speaking the language of the group he sought to reach. Missionaries have always had to learn to speak the required languages the hard way." It would seem logical that the gift of tongues in \|Ac 2:6-11 and 1Co 12-14 were the same.

 

However, we are not left to humans reasoning in this matter. 1Co 14:21 provides a proof that tongues as used in 1Co 14 means foreign languages as in Ac 2:6-11. Indeed 1Co 14:21 refers to and Old Testament prophecy on tongues-speaking that was fulfilled in Ac 2:6-11. In connection with saying in 1Co 14:22 that "tongues are a sign not to them that believe but to them that believe not," Paul says in 1Co 14:21, "In the law it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak to this people; and yet for all that they will not hear me, saith the Lord." From where in the Law or Old Testament was Paul quoting? Paul was quoting from Isa 28:11 (RSV) reads, "By men of strange lips and alien tongue the Lord will speak to this people...yet they would not hear."

 

When were the Jews to be spoken to in an alien or foreign tongue? Isa 28:14 states, "Therefore hear the word of the Lord ye scornful men that rule this people which is in Jerusalem." The day of Pentecost in Ac 2:6-11 is the only Scripturally recorded time that unbelieving Jews in Jerusalem heard the Gospel preached in foreign languages. Thus, 1Co 14:21 and Ac 2:6-11 both refer to the same incident.

 

Both use "tongues" to denote foreign languages.

 

Therefore tongues as used in 1Co 12-14 are a reference to foreign languages and not ecstatic utterances.

 

As is so often the case in problems of Scriptural interpretation, the Lord provides the key of interpretation within the Scriptural context. Isa 28:11, 14; Ac 2:6-11; 1Co 14:21 all refer to the same event and provide the Scriptural proof that the gift of tongues in the early Church was exclusively foreign languages. Further, the Apostle Paul uses 1Co 14:21-22 to prove that tongues are a sign for unbelievers because tongues as quoted from Isa 28:11, 14 was to be a great sign to unbelieving Israel. How effective a sign was it? Three thousand unbelieving Jews accepted Christ as a result. Indeed tongues were Scripturally intended to be a sign not to believers but to unbelievers.

 

And yet our charismatic friends use tongues as a sign among Christians to denote a "Spirit-filled Christian."

 

The Abuse of Tongues at Corinth

 

It is helpful to understand why Paul had to go into this discussion on tongues in 1Co 14. Corinth was the commercial center of Greece. Much of the commerce between Rome and the East passed through its harbors.

 

Consequently it was a city of many different nationalities. The gift of tongues (foreign languages) was prevalent among the brethren of Corinth to assist them in witnessing the Gospel to so many diverse nationalities.

 

1Co 14:19-20 reveals that the brethren at Corinth abused the gift. They were childish in the use of tongues. Like little children with a new toy, they wanted to show off. At their Church Services they exhorted in tongues (1Co 14:23) and they prayed in tongues (1Co 14:14-16) without any interpretation. This edified none (1Co 14:5). Hence Paulís reprimand, "Yet in the church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue. Brethren, be not children..."(1Co 14:19-20) Note the phrase "that by my voice I might teach others ALSO." This implies that when he spoke in an understanding language he taught himself and "others also. Conversely, if he spoke in tongues (foreign languages) he just taught himself. The thought of that even when speaking in tongues he comprehended what he was saying. This, of course, is not the case with ecstatic utterances of today where the tongues-speaker does not comprehend what he is saying.

 

1Co 14:9-11 provides another proof that Paul is speaking of foreign languages and not ecstatic utterances. In dealing with the problem of tongues Paul said, "except ye utter by the tongue words [rational sounds] easy to be understood [a common language], how shall it be known what is spoken? For ye shall speak into the air [in vain]. There are, it may be, so many kinds of voices [articulate speech] in the world, [notice Paul is not talking about so called "heavenly languages" but voices in the world] and none of them is without signification [each national language has its distinct meaning]. Therefore if I know not the meaning of the voice, I shall be unto him that speaketh a barbarian [foreigner] unto me." The Greek word means foreigner, not barbarian. Paul is clearly saying that an unknown voice or tongue would sound like a foreign language.

 

Novice the RSV of 1Co 14:11, "But if I do not know the meaning of the language, I shall be a foreigner to the speaker and the speaker a foreigner to me." The logic of 1Co 14:9-11 is only meaningful if tongues are foreign languages and not ecstatic utterances.

 

Tongues-Speakers Comprehend

 

Contemporary glossolalists do not comprehend their won ecstatic utterances. However, those that possessed the gift of tongues at Corinth did understand what they said as is shown in 1Co 14:5, Ďfor greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he [the speaker] interpret, that the church may receive edifying." In 1 Corinthians 14 Paul deals with the abuse of the gift of tongues and here at the beginning of the chapter he lays the ground rule for peaking in tongues. It is the tongues-speaker who should interpret and not someone. Else Nor is this the rare exception of one person having both the gift of tongues and interpretation. Paul is here setting the basic rule, that those who spoke in tongues in the apostlesí day understood what they were saying and should interpret it into the common language of the Church. Some were so proud of their gift that they spoke in tongues and didnít explain. But Paul says translate yourself.

 

1Co 14:27-28 expand on the ground rule of 1Co 14:5. "If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God." (1Co 14:27-28) It is in this last sense Paul says, "He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself."

 

Notice only one was to speak in tongues at a time. A little different than what you hear in some charismatic circles today. Also "let one interpret," either the speaker or someone else. "But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence." This proves the tongues-speaker knew beforehand what language he would speak in and whether or not there was an interpreter of that language present.

 

This raises a question. If according to 1Co 14:5 the tongues-speaker interprets himself, how would you have a situation as stated in 1Co 14:27-28, where neither the speaker nor anyone else were able to interpret.

 

Remember Corinth was a center of many nationalities and this situation could easily arise. It is not unusual for one to understand a new language and not speak it.

 

Greek was the common language in the church at Corinth. Say there was an Italian Christian in the church at Corinth and he had the gift of tongues. He could understand Greek but not speak it. He would be able to translate that tongue (foreign language) into his mother tongue, Italian. However, that would be meaningless to the church. Unless someone could translate his gift of tongues into Greek, he should keep silent.

 

1Co 14:14-17 shows that the person who is praying and singing in an unknown tongue can and should interpret it into words of understanding. "For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfriutful. What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also. Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest? For thou verily givest thanks well, but the other is not edified.

 

Notice the phrase "my spirit" in 1Co 14:14 in which Paul observes if he prayed in an unknown tongue, it was "my spirit" ónot the holy Spirit mechanically taking over. It was his gift of the Spirit by which he prayed intelligently in a foreign language. But this would create a problem.

 

His understanding of what he was praying would not be fruitful to others, since they would not understand the foreign language. Therefore, what would he do? He would pray and sing with the gift of the Spirit but he would also interpret it so that others could understand and be edified. This again confirms that the tongues-speaker comprehended what he was saying and that even prayers uttered in tongues were to be interpreted for the benefit of others present.

 

This consideration of tongues in 1 Corinthians 14 reveals three basic points concerning tongues in the apostlesí day.

 

1.Tongues were foreign languages.

 

2.The tongues-speaker understood what he said.

 

3.All utterances by the gift of tongues in the congregation, including prayers, were to be interpreted.

Chapter 4 GLOSSOLALIA TODAY

 

If the gift of tongues was not ecstatic utterances and if the gift of tongues ceased shortly after the death of the Apostles, then how do we account for the phenomenon of tongues in the form of ecstatic utterances today? It is interesting to note that glossolalia is not a phenomenon confined to Christianity. Pagan religions throughout the world are frenzied with tongues. This is reflected in an article in the Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation entitled "An Ethnological Study of Glossolalia" by George J. Jennings, March 1968.

 

Jennings observes that glossolalia is practiced amoung the following non-Christian religions of the world; the Peyote cult among the North American Indians, the Haida Indians of the Pacific Northwest, Shamans in the Sudan, the Shango cult of the West Coast of Africa, the Shago cult in Trinidad, the Voodoo cult in Haiti, the Aborigines of South American and Australia, the aboriginal peoples of the subarctic regions of North America and Asia, the Shamans in Greenland, the Dyaks of Borneo, the Zor cult of Ethiopia, the Siberian shamans, the Chaco Indians of South America, the Curanderos of the Andes, the Kinka in the African Sudan, the Thonga shamans of Africa, and the Tibetan monks. Certainly we wouldnít attribute Glossolalia in these heathen religions to the work of the holy Spirit.

 

Behavioral Scientists have conducted extensive research on glossolalia and for the most part concur that supernatural forces are not necessary to explain its existence. This is shown in an article entitled "Behavioral Science Research on the Nature of Glossolalia" which appears in the September, 1968, issue of the Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation. This article is perhaps one of the most comprehensive scientific discussions on glossolalia and some of its conclusions are briefly quoted as follows:

 

VI. Summary of Behavioral Science Research Data on Glossolalia.

 

1. Glossolalia is an ancient and widespread phenomenon of most societies, occurring most usually in connection with religion.

 

2. Glossolalia may occur as part of a larger condition of hysterical, dissociative, or trance states, or it may occur completely alone.

 

3. Glossolalia is not necessarily related to specific personality types.

 

4. Glossolalia may be deviant behavior due to abnormality of the mind, or it may be normal expected behavior, depending on the social and cultural environment.

 

5. Glossolalia is a form of partially developed speech in which the thought-speech apparatus of the person is used for a variety of internal mental functions.

 

6. Glossolalia may be a form of healthy regression in the service of the ego, leading to more creative modes of life.

 

VII. Possible Theological Implications

 

In my discussion in this paper, there is a wealth of reasonable information which gives us an outline of the mental, social, and cultural contexts within which glossolalia can be, and is, produced. Thus we need not invoke either divine or devilish supernatural forces to explain or justify the existence and function of glossolalia.

 

However, the fact that we have a reasonable scientific framework for explaining and understanding this behavior does not necessarily undercut its importance or value to either and individual or a religious group. Glossolalia can be useful and valuable as a media of spiritual exercise for an adherent.

 

Perhaps the most important distinction that should be made is between cause and consequence. Glossolalia is not "caused" by supernatural forces. However, glossolalia may be a "consequence" of involvement in deep and meaningful spiritual worship. Glossolalia does not miraculously change people in a supernatural sense, but participating in glossolalia is a part of a larger social and personal commitment may play an important role in the change of direction in participantís lives.

 

VIII. Summary

 

Glossolalia is an unusual pattern of aberrant speech. A review of the current research data provides a new source of information for examining the phenomena of glossolalia. If is a nodification of the conscious connection between inner speech and outer speech. The meaning and function of glossolalia is closely tied to its social and cultural context. The historic theological debates concerning glossolalia centered on whether it was of divine or devilish origin. Such debate is irrelevant.

 

Glossolalia, as such, is not a spiritual phenomea, but is may be a result of deep and meaningful spiritual exercise.

 

Whether we agree with these conclusions or not, the research referred to in the article reveals that glossolalia today is actually abbreviations of known languages.

 

Note the following quotations:

 

5A. Structural Linguistics of Glossolalia

 

A number of studies on American English-speaking glossolalists have recently been done.

 

These reports vary somewhat in the specific technical conclusions, but in general there is consistency in the conclusions. The differences seem to be due to the fact that glossolalic speech has different degrees of organization. Some glossolalia is very poorly organized and consists of little more than grunts and barely-formed sounds, while other glossolalia is highly organized into a systematic series of vowels and consonants. Several language studies, including our own, suggest that glossolalists develop their speech from ill-formed structure to "practiced" and "polished" glossolalic speech. Thus the quality of glossolalia depends to some extent on the stage of development of glossolalia.

 

The following seem to be reasonable conclusions from these studies. Glossolalia, in English-speaking subjects, is composed of the basic speech elements of English.

 

The major difference consists of a lack of organization of the basic vowels and consonants into the elements necessary for intelligible speech. The elements of speech such as pauses, breaths, intonations, etc., are greatly reduced or changed. Thus glossolalic speech tends to resemble the early speech qualities of young children before they organize all the various parts of the adult language. Further, there is a reduced number of vowels and consonants used. The conclusions of the linguists is that glossolalia has the characteristics of partially formed language, while lacking certain requirements of true language.

 

Indeed, many of the qualities of glossolalic speech are those found in the speech of young children. A comparison of Devereauxís outline of childrenís speech and glossolalic speech is striking. On this basis, one may suggest that glossolalic speech appears to be a return to an early way of speaking, in which speaking and sound are used for purposes other than just the communication of thought. This idea gets further support from other data to be cited.

 

Another line of investigation has focused on the duplication of glossolalia under experimental rather than religious conditions. Al Carlson, at the University of California, recorded two types of glossolalia. One type was recorded by volunteers who were asked to spontaneously speak in unknown language without having ever heard glossolalia. These speech samples were then rated and the two types of glossolalia could not be distinguished from each other. In fact, the "contrived" received better ratings as "good glossolalia" than did the actual glossolalia.

 

Werner Cohn, at the University of British Columbia, took naÔve students to Pentecostal churches to hear glossolalia and then asked the students to speak in glossolalia in the laboratory. They were able to successfully do so. Their recordings were then played to glossolalists who described the glossolalia as beautiful examples.

 

In sum, the data suggest: that glossolalia has a specific language structure based on the language tongue of the speaker; that the linguistic organization is limited; and that the capacity to speak in this type of semi-organized language can be duplicated under experimental conditions. Thus, glossolalia does not appear to be a "strange language," but rather the aborted or incomplete formation of familiar language.

 

This research clearly undercuts the claims of glossolalists that they speak a "heavenly language." In reality they are speaking abbreviations of their national language.

 

Another interesting article appeared in the New York Times, January 21, 1974: "JohnP. Kildahl, a clinical psychologist and professor at New York Theological Seminary, said here today that.the Pentecostal practice of speaking in tongues constituted "learned behavior."

 

Dr. Kildahl, an ordained Lutheran clergyman and former chief psychologist at the Lutheran Medical Center in Brooklyn, recently published a study of glossolalia undertaken with a grant form the National Institute of Mental Health.

 

In his address, he said that on the basis of his research and extensive correspondence with charismatic Christians it appeared that five elements were normally present when someone began speaking in tongues. These are a "magnetic" relationship with a group leader, a sense of personal distress, and "intense emotional atmosphere," a supporting group, and the prior learning of a rationale of its religious significance. In the case of people who begin to speak in tongues when they alone, he said "these five conditions have been present in the days or weeks preceding the initial experience."

 

Kildahl in his book The Psychology of Speaking in Tongues, further explains how glossolalia is initiated:

 

How the Experience is Initiated

 

Typically after an ordinary evening church service, interested members of the congregation are invited to remain in church in order to discuss the gift of tongues.

 

The leader encourages the people to "receive" this ability going from one another laying his hands on each personís head. "Say after me what I say, and then go on speaking in the tongue that the Lord will give you." One might utter a few syllables, speak for two or three minutes, or ten, or not for several days and while at home. "It was the best I ever felt in all my thirty-one years."

 

Once possessed of this ability, a person retains it and can speak with fluency whenever he chooses. It does not matter whether he is alone or in a group of fellow glossolalists. He can speak in tongues while driving a car or swimming. He can do it silently in the midst of a party, or aloud before a large audience. The experience brings peace and joy and inner harmony. Glossolalists view it as an answer to prayer, an assurance of divine love and acceptance. It is referred to as a "direct and personal encounter with the holy Spirit."

 

How do we explain tongues today? As has been noted, tongues-speaking is also practiced in many heathen religions throughout the world today. Certainly this is not the work of the holy Spirit. Perhaps Behavioral. Scientists are correct in saying that much of tongues-speaking has a natural explanation. However, this much is observable-when a person has experienced tongues he is absolutely convinced as to the scripturalness of his experience and the correctness of his doctrinal beliefs.

 

Hence the traditional Pentecostal insists on the correctness of the "second blessing." The theologically liberal Protestant who speaks in tongues feels that his doubt in the inspiration of the Bible is vindicated.

 

Catholic Pentecostals testify that the charismatic experience has deepened their devotion to Mary. A glossolalic experience convinces Mormons that their brand of Christianity is right, etc. Thus, while tongues may not be directly caused by Satan yet it can be used by him as an effective means of sidetracking sincere Christians. The following scriptures reveal that one of the signs of the end of the world or age would be the phenomenal working deceptions of Satan in the Church.

 

"And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things?

 

Verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down." "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect." Mt 24:2, 24 "Even his, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie." 2Th. 2:9-11 Satanís involvement in the charismatic wonders cannot be ruled out as part of the deceptive wonders at the end of the age.

Chapter 5 THE SPIRIT-FILLED CHRISTIAN

 

We are happy to see our charismatic friends separating from the spirit of nominalism in the churches. However, it is disheartening to see their preoccupation with the seeming miraculous robbing them of "beholding the glory of the Lord" "with unveiled face" which comes by the study of and articulation in the "Word of God."

 

In connection with the creation of the earth, Ge 1:2 says that "...the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." The operation of the holy Spirit in the creation, though powerful, was a mechanical function; whereas, the operation of the holy Spirit in the Christian is not mechanical. Ro 8:11 says, "But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you." The work of the holy Spirit in our bodies is powerful because it is far more than mechanical. It must contend with our free will.

 

In 2Co 10:4, 5 the Apostle describes one aspect of this work. "For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds; Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ." Also in Ga 5:16-17 we read, "Walk in the Spirit and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other." The real power of the Spirit is not shown by its taking over a Christian and mechanically causing the speech organs to utter sounds that are even unintelligible to the speaker.

 

Greater power is shown in the Spiritís ability to appeal to our free will daily and hourly to fully surrender self, self-will, pride, selfish ambition, wrath, strife, selfishness, uncleanness, envy, jealousy, etc. In their place the Spirit works jointly with our wills to develop in us "the place the Spirit works jointly with our wills to develop in us "the fruit of the Spirit which is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, faith, meekness, temperance." Ga 5:22-23

 

A Spirit-filled Christian doesnít continually exuberate emotional joy. But he will possess the inner joy which is a fruit of the Spirit, though it might at times be alloyed with pain and sorrow. As the Apostle Peter so well stated in 1Pe 1:6-7, "Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptation: That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried by fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ."

 

Jesus, our example, had this inner joy, Heb 12:2-3, yet he was called "a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief." (Isa 53:3) It is questionable how comfortable this "man of sorrows" would feel in some emotionally pitched charismatic services.

 

A Spirit-filled Christian is little interested in prayers for miraculous deliverance from pain, sickness, trial, sorrow, persecution. He has grown to realize that the Lordís way generally is not the removal, but strength to bear or endure the experience. As the Apostle Paul observes in 1Co 10:13, "There hath no trial taken you but such as is common to man but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tried above that ye are able; but will with the trial also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it." Note well the phrase, "God will not suffer you to be tried above that ye are able." Generally it is the immature Christian that needs miraculous deliverance, for he is not able to endure the experience. Whereas, the mature Christian needs only the help of the Lord and he is willing to endure or bear the experience because of the insights of the Spirit he will glean from it. Remember the Lordís answer to Paulís thrice-uttered prayer for the removal of his physical affliction, "My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecution, in distresses for Christís sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong." (2Co 12:7-10) Notice it is in infirmity and not in the removal of infirmities that the Christian experiences the real power of Christ. It is in weakness that the Christian through the Spiritís working power becomes strong. Were the sky always without a cloud and the ocean without a ripple, the believer would not know so well the God with whom he has to do. As one mature Christian expressed it: "It is when the clouds are the darkest and the tempest the highest that the Lordís presence is most keenly felt through a realization of his tender, personal love. His grace to sustain and his presence to cheer amid lifeís deepest afflictions becomes memoryís most hallowed resting places."

 

The Spirit-filled Christian is humbly concerned for his brethren. Many Christians lament that their charismatic friends sound like little children with new toys at Christmastime. How they glory and boast in their mechanical wonders. But what did the Apostle Paul glory in? "If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things which concern mine infirmities." (2Co 11:30) Paul lists the infirmities he gloried in. "Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep; In journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren; In weariness and painfulness, in watchings often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold and nakedness." (2Co 11:24-27).Why did Paul glory in infirmity? He gives us the answer in 2Co 11:29, "Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is offended, and I burn not?" Paul gloried in infirmity because his infirmities enabled him by the Spiritís working to sympathize with his brethren in infirmity.

 

The ripest saints, in whom we find the deepest sympathy, the most patient forbearance, and the most tender helpfulness and consideration, are those who have been through the fires of affliction and have been rightly exercised thereby.

 

What is a Spirit-filled Christian?

 

The apostles before Pentecost possessed the mechanical operation of the Spirit whereby they could perform miracles of healing, etc. (Mt 10:1-8) But certainly they were not then Spirit-filled. It was only after years of growth following Pentecost that the apostles could write the following Spirit-filled observations: "And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us, God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him. Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world." (1Joh 4:16-17) The Apostle John was not perfect or complete when he received the Holy spirit. But over a period of time his love was made complete or perfect.

 

"And beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge; and to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness; and to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity. For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But hi that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins." 2Pe 1:5-9 "Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God. And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also; knowing that tribulation worketh patience; and patience experience; and experience, hope: and hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the holy Spirit which is given unto us." (Ro 5:1-5) Notice it is a period of time after we receive Christ (Ro 5:1) that we have the necessary experiences to be filled with the Spirit. It should be readily apparent that the "fruit of the Spirit" (the growth of Christian graces) are of greater value than the instantly imparted "gifts of the Spirit."

Chapter 6 "MY SPIRIT UPON ALL FLESH"

 

"And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams: and on my servants and on my handmaidens I will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall prophesy: and I will shew wonders in heaven above, and signs in the earth beneath; blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke: the sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before that great and notable day of the Cord come: and it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved." Ac 2:17-21 Some use Ac 2:17 to prove that in the "last days," just before Christ returns, there would be a charismatic outpouring of the holy Spirit. This they claim is now being fulfilled throughout the world. But notice Ac 2:17 speaks of Godís Spirit poured on not just a few or many, but on "all flesh." The charismatic movement is just a grain of sand on the sea shore compared with the total population of the world. Remember Jesus said his followers would numerically be a "little flock."

 

But the Scriptures show that after the "little flock," the Church of Christ, is selected then Godís Spirit will indeed be poured out on "all flesh," Ac 2:17-21 is a quotation from Joel 2:28-32. Instead of using the phrase "last days, Joel 2:28 reads," And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my Spirit upon all flesh."

 

After what? After "the great and terrible day of the Lord" which the book of Joel describes in detail Joel 2:30-31

 

Joel 2:28-32 actually shows two different outpourings of the holy Spirit. One outpouring is "in those days," which is the period of time before the complete destruction of this "present evil world" (social order) in "the great and terrible day of the Lord." This period, "in those days " began at Pentecost and continues to the end of the age.

 

During it the holy Spirit is only poured on a special class, the man servants and woman servants. (Joel 2:29; Ac 2:18) The Greek word here is the same one that denotes the "bond servants of Christ" or those who compose the Church of Christ.

 

The second outpouring of Godís Spirit is "afterward" in Joel 2:28 or "in the last days" as referred to in Ac 2:17.

 

And "all fresh" are the recipients. It is generally recognized that the "last days" refer to the end of the word or age (Mt 24:3) just preceeding the full establishment of Christís Kingdom. (Examples of this usage are found in 2Ti 3:15; Eze 38:16; Jas 5:1-4.) However, the term "last days" is used just as frequently in the Bible to denote the period after Christís Kingdom is fully established-the very same "last days" of Ac 2:17 when Godís Spirit is poured out on "all flesh." Hos 3:5 speaks of Israel returning to God and seeking David their Kind in the "latter days." Her is a reference to Israelís blessing by the reign of Christ as the antitypical David during the 1,000 year Kingdom of Christ. Isa 2:2-4 and Mic 4:1-5 are beautiful prophecies concerning the Kingdom of Christ in the "last days" and how it will bless "all flesh," all mankind.

 

"But in the last days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the house of the Lord shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills; and people shall flow unto it. And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths; for the law shall go forth of Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid: for the mouth of the Lord of hosts hath spoken it. For all people will walk every one in the name of the name of his god, and we will walk in the name of the Lord our God for ever and ever." Mic 4:1-5 Note three salient points:

 

(1) The period in which the mountain or Kingdom of Christ is reigning throughout the earth is called the "last days" (Mic 4:1).

 

(2) This Kingdom blesses all mankind. All nations will learn peace (Mic 4:3) and every man will have economic and civil security (Mic 4:4).

 

(3) For all people will walk in the name of God. All people then will be able to walk in the name of God because in Christís Kingdom of Godís Spirit will be poured out upon all flesh.

 

When the Apostle Peter quoted Joel 2:28-32 on the day of Pentecost, many Jews from all over the world gathered at Jerusalem were converted to Christ.

 

Pentecostal outpouring became the token or pledge of the fact that after "the great and terrible day of the Lord" (Joel 2:28) when Christís Kingdom is fully set up in the "last days" all flesh will be given the opportunity to be converted and receive the holy Spirit. The actual fulfillment of this prophecy can only occur in Christís Kingdom.

 

Why does Christís Kingdom embody the "last day?" The "last days" denote the time period in which the final features of Godís plan of salvation for mankind are accomplished. The holy Spirit will play a very significant role in this final work as shown in Re 22:17. "And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely." The phrase, "water of life," is a reference to the beautiful vision of Christís Kingdom in Re 22:1-5 of this same chapter. Here the blessings of the Millennial Kingdom for the healing of the nations are described.

 

One of these blessings is the abundant supply of truth pictured by a mighty river of the water of life, clear as crystal proceeding from the throne of God and the Lamb (Christ). Verse 17 shows the offices the holy Spirit and the bride (the resurrected Church) will also fill in the Kingdom. Only as the people come into full harmony with the holy Spirit will any of them become eligible for the eternal life.

 

Thus we see that Godís Spirit poured out on all flesh in the last days (Acts 2:17) is not a reference to the current charismatic movement.

 

The work of the holy Spirit in the Church has been a sadly neglected subject. The charismatic movement, although a reaction to this neglect, has evidently been a misguided quest. The one book we can heartily recommend on this subject is The Atonement Between God and Man. First published in 1899, the 145 pages that deal with the holy Spirit remain the classic in its field for Scriptural soundness and clarity of explanation.

 

It deals with the relationship between the Father, Son and holy Spirit; the gifts and fruits of the Spirit; the witness, seal and baptism of the holy Spirit; and many other facets of this vital subject..We are happy to offer it to you at cost $2.00, for a 538 page cloth bound edition. Send for your copy of The Atonement Between God and Man.