BIBLE STUDENTS
IN BRITAIN
The Story of a
Hundred Years
A. O. Hudson
Bible
Fellowship Union 11 Lyncroft Gardens Hounslow Middlesex 1989 0900166 12 6
Printed by Remous Ltd., Milbourne Port, Sherbourne, Dorset.
PREFACE
A would-be
humorist once defined history as "the consolidation of doubtful legend
into indisputable fact." This is perhaps hardly applicable to the present
case; the author enjoys the advantage of having been closely connected with the
events he relates insofar as the latter seventy years of the story are
concerned, and for the earlier thirty-five, possession of records supplemented
by notes of reminiscences related to him in bygone years by early stalwarts who
have long since departed this earthly scene. So there emerges the history of a
fellowship which conducted a remark-able Christian work during the early years
of this century, survived the sad interlude which imperiled its future, and
rose above the threat to continue its witness, albeit in lower key, into the present.
This is a story, so far as the United Kingdom is concerned, of the
"Harvest of the Age."
1 EARLY DAYS
THEY CAME off
the boat at Southampton, that autumn day in 1881, two American evangelists,
J.C. Sunderlin and J. J. Bender, commissioned by Pastor C.T. Russell to plant
in Great Britain the message he was assiduously preaching in the United States.
They set foot
on these shores with the enthusiasm of men entering upon virgin territory. The
States had known this evangel for two years past; it was as yet unknown in this
country. The time had come to proclaim it.
This
understanding of the Divine purpose, telling of a coming era of life, peace and
security destined for the human race, was being proclaimed in the United States
by the widespread free circulation of a fairly massive booklet entitled
"Food for Thinking Christians" and a great deal of interest was being
thereby generated. The old orthodox theology of gloom and doom was superseded
in its pages by a conception of God and his attitude to mankind which stressed
the inevitable super-session of the injustice, misery, disease and death
inseparable from this world as it now is by an everlasting world of justice,
happiness, health and life under the oversight of the Lord Jesus Christ, Man
has made the world what it now is; God will remake it to the world of his wish,
and all who elect to come into conformity with that wish will eventually come
into this world and enjoy it for ever. All this leaves untouched the heavenly
expectation of Christians who have lived their lives in expectation of Christ
in the heavenly realm after this life. The conception was that of two worlds, a
celestial and a terrestrial, in each of which those best fitted for either will
find themselves at the end—and be perfectly satisfied, living each in their own
environment yet in eternal communion with each other. That was the vision which
inspired these two men as they made their way to London.
Their mandate
was to have some three hundred thousand copies of "Food for Thinking
Christians" printed in London and have them distributed at church doors in
some of Britain’s principal cities. Unfortunately Sunderlin was taken rather
seriously ill soon after arrival and had to return hurriedly to the States,
leaving Bender to carry out the distribution by himself. This he did, starting
out by having one hundred thousand distributed in London alone, by boys of the
National Messenger Service—long since defunct—at church doors all over the
Metropolis after Sunday evening service. He traveled north, personally
distributing the book in the same fashion, in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee,
Aberdeen, Newcastle, Darlington, Huddersfield, Hull, Nottingham, Leeds,
Carlisle, and Manchester. He then returned to the States, leaving the seed to
germinate.
The green
shoots were not long in appearing. From all of the cities visited came
inquiries for more information; some enquirers became readers of Pastor
Russell’s magazine, "Zion’s Watch Tower." The bulk of the inquiries
came from London, Glasgow, Nottingham, and Manchester, for ever afterwards the
principal centers of the new faith. The salient feature of this understanding
was that the long-promised Second Advent, usually visualized as a fiery descent
from the skies to execute judgment, was in fact already in progress as a
winding up of the present social order in preparation for the setting up of a
Divine government on earth which would effect world conversion and the
elimination of evil with all its concomitants, oppression, disease, death. Such
new order would afford a full and complete opportunity to all to amend their
lives in accord with the principles of truth and equity, so that earthly
affairs would be conducted along line of justice and peace into all perpetuity.
An increasing number of people caught the light of this bright vision; this
"Food for Thinking Christians" found its way into towns far removed
from the points of distribution, and quite soon an appreciable response was
forthcoming.
So far there
was no suggestion of organized meetings. Russell’s intention and desire was to
initiate an interdenominational interest among members of existing churches,
not to form a new sect. It was inevitable, however, that groups of people drawn
together by interest in this new understanding of Scripture should wish to
congregate for mutual discussion and progress.
This was
already happening in the States. Now, in June 1882, little more than six months
after the distribution of the booklet in this country, a dozen people in
Glasgow, chiefly men folk, commenced to hold a regular meeting for the study
and discussion of the Bible in this light. This was the first Bible Students’
meeting in this country, so far as records and recollection can tell. Rather
appropriately, perhaps, it was a humble beginning. The organizer and leader of
this initial meeting was apparently a man in a lowly walk of life—his name is
lost to history—and the meetings, as described by one who joined them a few
years later, were held in a "tiny, dingy hall in a poor locality,"
which reminds one of Russell’s own description of his entry into vital
Christian faith when he "quite by accident, dropped into a dusty, dingy
hall in Allegheny where I had heard that religious meetings were held, to see
if the handful who met there had anything more sensible to offer than the
creeds of the Churches."
So be it; some
of those in Glasgow who spearheaded the faith in such lowly circumstances were
to witness, almost thirty years later, five thousand turned away, to hear the
message that had captivated their own hearts in these earlier years. As in the
days when the Christian faith was young and the Apostles went out preaching,
"so mightily grew the Word of God, and prevailed."
That, though,
lay yet in the future. Of the first ten years or so this little meeting three
names only have survived, a Mrs. Hodge and two men destined in later days to
become well known in the growing fellowship. William Crawford and Robert
Cormack were two of these pioneers, and Crawford at least had much to do with
later events. At the moment, though, they studied and discussed quietly with
that little group in that "tiny dingy hall in a poor locality."
During that
same period events were happening elsewhere.
Solitary
individuals, in some cases two or three together, were in communication with
Pastor Russell, asking questions and querying what they could do to make the
message known in their own areas. Apart from the continued free circulation of
"Food for Thinking Christians" there was little else to feed the
growing demand for more information; the real handbooks of the movement,
Russell’s six -volume series "Studies in the Scriptures," had yet to
be written and published, and the wonder is that these interested inquirers
held on so long on so little. But hold on they did; all over the country, to
the tune of some three hundred individuals by 1885 who were assiduous readers
of "Zion’s Watch Tower;" in the light of this they made progress in
what later became generally referred to as "Present Truth." (It has
to be admitted that this term has also been used in the same sense by other
Christian communities, before and since.) Already in two other areas,
Nottinghamshire and London, individual Christians found others in their own
localities following the same line of thought, and joined up to form little
groups for study and discussion. In East Kirkby, a Nottinghamshire mining
village, Thomas Smedley, the village chemist, round about 1890 put a notice in
his shop window, "Bible Class held here" and immediately a group was
formed; Smedley in after years performed yeoman service almost up to his death,
travelling the country preaching the faith he had accepted. The Nottingham area
has been an important center of the Bible Students ever since.
At the same
time activity was manifest in London. Since the first distribution of
"Food" in 1881 there had been a number of interested individuals in
touch with the Pastor and it was in the year 1883 that a study group to discuss
these things was commenced in the North London home of a rather remarkable
woman and her husband.
Elizabeth Horne
was the type of person, who having acquired an exposition of the Divine Plan
which resolved all her theological doubts and misgivings, must needs tell it
out to others. Within a few years she, in common with others in her group, was
conducting open-air meetings in Hyde Park—perhaps the very first of the
"public meetings" which became so pronounced a feature of the
fellowship in later years. It is recorded that this redoubtable lady preached
in the Park for three hours at a stretch, to "attentive, respectful crowds
of orderly, thoughtful looking people gathered to listen," to quote the
records. At a slightly later date, 1891, she organized the meetings for the
first visit of Pastor Russell to this country, entertaining him at her home,
from which she appears to have been as good an organizer as she was a preacher.
This Elizabeth Horne must have been quite a girl!
Like the sister
group at Glasgow, this was apparently a small and inconspicuous company of
earnest students—names that have survived are those of Samuel Bather with wife
and daughter, John Brookes, Arthur Carey, but nothing very definite. As a
company it grew in numbers until it was ultimately absorbed by the larger
meetings which developed in London in later years.
But, as with
Glasgow, it lit the flame, in humble surroundings, which was destined to burn
brighter and clearer in coming years, until eventually the London congregation
was the largest Bible Students community in the world, with the largest church
building in which to worship.. The little Glasgow meeting continued in its
quiet way for fifteen years before the enlargement associated with a well-known
family name, the Edgars, came upon the scene. The London meetings continued for
fourteen years before the work associated with another well-known family name,
the Guards, had its rise, and in the meantime other London groups were started,
Ealing in 1890, Stoke Newington 1891, Crouch End 1892, Lewisham 1894, Surbiton
and Forest Gate 1896, and Kensington 1899. The growth of the Bible Student
faith in what from the start has always been its two principal centers, London
and Glasgow, commencing with the lowly and unnoticed, well illustrates the
principle of the Divine operation: "not by might, nor by power, but by my
Spirit, saith the Lord of Hosts."
All this was to
change. The year 1891 saw a sudden acceleration of the witness. Pastor Russell
made his first visit to these shores.
It was a hurried
visit. It would seem that this visit to Europe was more of a personal and
sentimental one for he spent most of his time in Ireland.
(Although a
third or fourth generation American, he was ultimately of Scotch-Irish
descent.) Landing at Queenstown, he did visit various interested people in
Cork, Dublin, Belfast, Londonderry and a few other places. His purpose in
Ireland accomplished, he came to London, where he arranged with the North
London group to establish a London depot, for the storage and distribution of
Bible Student literature, under the supervision of one of the North London
elders, Thomas Hart. (By this time the first three volumes of "Studies in
the Scriptures: had been published and were eliciting widespread interest.) He
ministered at several meetings arranged in London by Elizabeth Horne, where a
hundred and fifty gathered together, left for a brief visit to Glasgow to meet
the interested there, thence to Liverpool for the same purpose, and so back to
the States. Very few people know he had been in the country at all. At
Liverpool he met Charles Elam, an interested man who was minister of a small
mission hall where a hundred and fifty gathered to hear him.
Charles Elam
became the founder of the Liverpool church of Bible Students whose history runs
from this date, with starting membership of forty. Already there had been
meetings established at Manchester, Hucknall in Notts, and the Surrey village
of Penshurst where the local stationmaster, one Pearson, had electrified the
village with the message. 1891 saw Nottingham, Liverpool, and Dublin come on
the scene and by 1892 Bristol, Edinburgh, Sheffield, followed by Belfast in
1895 and by Birmingham, Leeds, Middlesbrough, dundee, Dumfries; and by
Sevenoaks and Chatham in Kent. (Kent, not having any big cities, was noteworthy
for its proliferation of small groups.
Most towns and
a great many small villages possessed a local community from a very early
date.) These possessed a local community from a very early date.) These groups
were usually commenced by the zealous labors of some active individual such as
Arthur Riley of Bristol, James Bright of Belfast, John Green of Sheffield,
William Raynor and William Drinkwater of Nottingham, George Mullens of
Sevenoaks, —names which lingered long among the national community.
With some forty
regular meetings established and an increasing number of people all over the
country becoming interested, it was deemed desirable that someone from the
States should come to England and organize the work of proclamation of the
message on a systematic basis. The man selected was one S. D.
Rogers, who
arrived at the end of 1893 to show the British brethren how to preach the
Gospel. His assignment was to organize a system of colporteuring, viz, the
going from door to door advocating and endeavoring to "place" the
"Scripture Studies" volumes. Since there had been for quite a few
years past a fair amount of this work going on, this became largely a matter.of
preaching to the converted. It soon began to become apparent, however, to the
brethren of the London church, with whom he was billeted, that there was
another side to S.D. Rogers. He began to advocate a plan whereby he himself
should be supported financially by the Brethren so that he could go from town
to town as an itinerant preacher, being given free board and lodgings at each
place, the necessary halls and facilities being provided at local brethren’s
expense. This proposition and attitude, so alien from the tenor and spirit of
Pastor Russell’s principles and practice, which relied entirely on unsolicited
gifts for the support of his work, alarmed the London church. The outcome was
that Elizabeth Horne communicated with the Pastor to say that the London church
felt it necessary completely to reject S.D. Rogers and his ideas, and to ask
for guidance.
Eventually he
returned to the States and so far as the UK was concerned the matter was
closed.
During this
period there was a considerable amount of "public witness" carried
on, consisting not so much of public meetings but the patient distribution of
tracts and pamphlets from door to door, and the provision of the book "The
Divine Plan of the Ages," being Volume One of "Scripture
Studies," to those who evinced sufficient interest. Men were thus brought
into the ambit of the brethren who afterwards became doughty champions of the
faith.
It was thus
that in 1893 Frederick George Guard, an open-air evangelist and leader of a
local evangelical choir, became possessed of a copy of the "Divine Plan of
the Ages." Its contents gripped and persuaded him. He found that some of
his acquaintances had also seen and read the book. A resident of Stratford,
East London, he was ignorant of the established group in North London. He did
the obvious thing; in collaboration with his friend William Thirkettle of
Forest Gate he established, in 1896, a group in his own home in Stratford. This
was the beginning of the later well-known Forest Gate Church. With an initial
membership of 18, Thirkettle was appointed to organize a massive program of
tract distribution and open-air preaching. In the next twenty years that
congregation came to number more than four hundred. London was shaping up for
the greater things yet to come. The Metropolis was seeing the beginning of a
process which was to lead to class meetings scattered all over the city and its
environs, and a work of evangelism which ultimately resulted in meetings
crammed to capacity at the Royal Albert Hall, London’s leading auditorium.
This infusion
of new blood into the capital with the coming of Forest Gate in 1896 was
paralleled by a similar development in Britain’s second city, Glasgow. For some
years a certain Mrs. Hodge, a member of the original Glasgow group, had been
trying to convert her own sister, Sarah Ferrie (known to later generations of
the fellowship as "Aunt Sarah"). After reading the first three
volumes of the "Scripture Studies" in 1897 Sarah Ferrie was
convinced. Being a person of positive convictions and apparently limitless
energy, she commenced a week-night meeting in her own business premises in 1898
and promptly proceeded to evangelize her customers and business contacts. An
illustration of her unconventional methods was related many years later by an
observer who was with a party of Scottish brethren in 1906 on the railway
station seeing off an American visitor. As the train stood in the station Aunt
Sarah approached the engine-driver, leaning out of his cab waiting for the
starting signal, handed him some tracts, and bade him "drive very
carefully, for one of the King’s sons is on the train." The
engine-drivers’ immediate reaction is not recorded, but the longer term
consequence was that he came into the Truth and was present at the big Glasgow
convention two years later when Pastor Russell visited the city. One is tempted
to surmise that this Sarah Ferrie was perhaps a Glasgow version of London’s
Elizabeth Horne!
William
Crawford and Robert Cormak, of the existing Glasgow group, began to attend this
meeting in addition to their own. By 1899 Dr. John Edgar, senior surgeon at a
leading Glasgow Hospital, had become a member. John’s father and one of his
sisters had espoused the faith something like ten years earlier; now, within a
few years, five more of the Edgar family embraced the truth, and with them
another couple, Alex Tait and wife, thereafter to be active workers with the
Edgars. These, with Crawford and Cormack, constituted a formidable team which
set the Glasgow church on its feet. Records are silent as to the history of the
original group dating from 1882 but it is virtually certain that they merged
with the Edgar effort and so all the brethren in the city presented a united
front.
The year 1899
marked another circumstance which was to have a marked effect in later years.
Jesse Hemery, of Eccles, near Manchester, paid his first visit to London in the
interests of the expanding work. Brother Russell first met Jesse Hemery on his
first visit to Britain in 1891. A young man of twenty-seven, he was in trade as
a baker and confectioner in Eccles. He must have been among the earliest in
this country to become interested, manifesting considerable zeal and enthusiasm
for the cause, and spending considerable time in the north of the country to
interview people becoming interested. He was in fact the decisive factor in the
conversion of Sarah Ferrie of Glasgow, so setting in motion the sequence of
events which brought the Edgar family into the faith, with the consequent
implications for the future of the Glasgow church. Brother Russell had formed a
high opinion of his capabilities and now had him visit London to assess the
progress of matters there. Hemery made his visit—not a very long one—spending
most of his time with Federick Guard and the incipient Forest Gate church, by
now numbering some seventy-five, where he conducted five or six meetings,
followed by a quick run round London to look up various individuals.known to be
interested. He apparently did not know of, for he did not visit, the group
associated with Elizabeth Horne, nor any of the other older established
meetings in London. He returned north, not having achieved much, except to
forge a link with Guard and his group; the visit would have had little
significance were it not for the fact that Jesse Hemery later became Brother
Russell’s representative in London and so of nation-wide influence.
With the
increasing number of regular meetings and something like fifteen hundred
vitally interested people scattered over the country constantly writing to
Brother Russell, the Pastor judged the time was ripe to centralize British
activities in Britain itself.
In May 1900 he
sent one of his co-laborers, E.C. Henninges and his wife, to England for the
purpose of setting up an office and depot in London from which all future work
in the UK should be conducted. (It should be explained that this work comprised
the import, storage and distribution of the Pastor’s Publications, tracts,
books, etc, and was not in any sense an effort to control or direct the
organization and individual work of the British groups.
At all times
each such group was completely independent, managing its own affairs and linked
to the Pastor only through the medium of the common faith.) The office and
depot was set up in Gipsy Lane, Forest Gate, London, and Henninges entered into
friendly co-operation with the Forest Gate Church. Joint efforts resulted in
the acquiring of a hall for their meetings in Woodgrange Road, Forest Gate. A
system of wholesale tract distribution, public meetings, "pilgrim
visits" (a capable brother visiting outlying incipient groups to encourage
and instruct them) and "colporteur work," (involving calling house to
house to interest occupiers in the "Divine Plan" book) was
established, and Henninges traveled the length and breadth of the country
suggesting and encouraging all who wished to have part in this organized
outreach of instructed evangelism.
The first few
months’ work, from June to November, resulted in three thousand copies of the
"Divine Plan" and a quarter of a million booklets being distributed,
50,000 of the latter in London alone. Thirty-nine British towns so far
untouched by the message now heard it for the first time. So far as London was
concerned Forest Gate took a prominent part in what was going on and early in
1901 Brother Henninges was unanimously elected Pastor of the Forest Gate
Church. That year, 1901, saw a one hundred per cent increase in the circulation
of literature and general activity. A change in oversight, however, was
imminent. In November of that year the Pastor recalled Henninges for briefing
in a new sphere of activity in Germany and appointed Jesse Hemery to take his
place.
Thus Jesse
Hemery became manager of the British office of the Society, a position he
retained for most of his life. He inherited the Gipsy Lane depot. He was also
unanimously elected Pastor of the Forest Gate Church in succession to
Henninges. During the next twelve months the circulation of literature
increased again, to nearly three-quarters of a million copies, and twenty
thousand volumes of "Studies in the Scriptures." All of this involved
quite laborious door-to-door work at a time when the number of active workers
could not have exceeded fifteen hundred. In 1902 a representative of the
Pastor, J. Hope Hay, coming to England on a business mission, spent some time
travelling the country visiting some of the centers convenient to his
commitments; he managed to consult with the existing groups in some other
cities, reporting a definite upsurge of interest in Ireland, largely due to the
efforts of James Bright of Belfast, responsible for starting the meeting there.
C.H. Houston had achieved considerable progress at Edinburgh and a newcomer to
the field was Dan Murray of Dundee; the group he founded there endured until
1965.
1902 was the
end of the day of small beginnings. The following year was to see a
fantastically rapid growth of the movement commencing with a visit of Brother
Russell, his tour of the principal city centers where meetings existed, and
well attended conventions in London and Glasgow. The next fifteen years was to
witness what was afterward, and correctly, termed the work of harvest, the
"Harvest of the Age." A fundamental aspect of Brother Russell’s views
was that the end of the present era, which he believed to be imminent, would be
signaled by an unprecedented clarification of theological views regarding the
purpose of God in creation, and a realization of the time, manner, and nature
of the Second Advent clearer by far than that of the previous few centuries. He
pointed out that the idea of a Harvest of the Age is implicit in the teachings
of Jesus and that the gathering together of Christians of all denominations and
of none to an understanding of these things, and a living faith that the
Presence of the Lord was an accomplished fact, was in itself a harvest in this
sense. The fact that the message was going forth world-wide and receiving
enthusiastic acceptance from all quarters served to buttress his faith, and
that of those, too, who accepted these views from him. The story of the next twenty
years shows how well-founded was the general outline of that belief.
There were now
about sixty regular group meetings existing in the UK, ranging in membership
from fifteen to several hundreds, a total membership of active supporters
approaching twenty-five hundred. Additional to these there were many interested
attendants at the meetings who did not go so far as to join in the active work.
Early in
1903 the father of John Edgar died. He must have been one of the first in the
United Kingdom to accept the message and throw in his lot with it. He saw the
seed sown and he saw the promise of a rich harvest. It was left to his sons,
John and...Morton, and their sister Minna, to play their part in the stirring
events that were to follow.
2 HARVEST OF
THE AGE
A
DISTINGUISHING feature of the Bible Student movement was its insistence that
the early 20th century was to witness a "Harvest of the Age," a
period during which the sum total of all Christian evangelical work effected
during the two thousand years of Christian history would head up into a climax
heralding the fact that the Second Advent, so fervently anticipated by many
ministers and laymen of every denomination during the 19th century, had now
become reality. There was, however, a fundamental difference. The old-time
orthodox view of the event looked for a humanly visible appearance of the
returned Christ in the upper skies with attendant angels, coming to earth to
conduct a twenty-four hour Day of judgment, in which dead and living are to be
summoned before him to be adjudged worthy of everlasting life or everlasting
punishment—in older times the terrors of a fiery Hell, although this aspect was
becoming increasingly rejected in the present. The Bible Student position was
that the Advent covers a period, that its initial stage is one in which the
returned Christ is present, although unseen, overruling the actions and affairs
of men so that the powers of this world will, by the ordained time, yield to
his rule and from then on this world will be under his benevolent
administration.
This was the
vision, and when compared with the more somber and even terrifying outlook on
things theological which it was set to challenge there is small wonder at the
zeal and energy with which the early converts set about proclaiming the
message, nor the interest aroused and the acceptance it received. "Good
tidings of great joy" they insisted, and so it was. The salient principle,
that none—whether unbeliever, unreached heathen, or reprobate—could be eternally
lost without first being brought to a full "knowledge of the truth,"
to use the New Testament phrase, thus solving all enigmas of those who in this
world have died without even hearing of the means of eternal life, had been
widely discussed in Christian circles for half a century past. It was left to
Charles Russell to point out that this precisely is the purpose of the coming
Millennium and because of his conviction that the Millennium was at the doors
he was bound to lead this world-wide proclamation.
So, in the year
1903, Pastor Russell landed at Southampton to commence a series of visits in
which he became as widely known here as in his native America. (His first visit
in 1891 was a preliminary one to "get the feel of the country," so to
speak.) There was a sizeable number of enthusiasts waiting to greet him.
The principal
London church, which had existed since 1883, . now numbering some 400, were his
hosts as at his 1891 visit, and there was the younger Forest Gate church of
about 125.
These between
them arranged the first London Bible Students convention, a function which has
continued more or less without intermission since; on this initial occasion the
attendance at the five sessions started at 400 and reached a maximal at the
last session of 800. After a short trip in Scandinavia the Pastor returned to
visit Glasgow, where the comparatively small church there had gathered a
thousand interested people to hear him.
(This
established their fortunes; within the next eight years their church membership
had increased to 500.) Of the fifty or so other local churches which had by now
been established in the UK he was able to visit seven and address public
meetings with audiences up to 600. A final visit to London to find, in
conjunction with Jesse Hemery, a more convenient London office for the
expanding work, in succession to the existing one at Gipsy Lane, Forest Gate,
duly acquired and opened at 24 Eversholt Street, Kings Cross, in central
London, and he was away.
This set the
pattern for the next ten years. In 1905 he sent one of his co-workers, M.L.
McPhail, to conduct the first of what became known as "pilgrim
visits" throughout the country. The function of a "pilgrim,"
always a mature brother in Faith, was to visit each local church on a planned
route, stay with them one or two days, conduct meetings of the church at which
features of the Faith could be more fully discussed, address a public meeting
if such had been arranged, and put them in touch with other adjacent churches
of who existence they had not heretofore been aware. This was the commencement
of a close acquaintanceship and co-operation between local churches which has
always been characteristic of the movement. The members regarded each other as
brethren in Christ and in fact this word "brethren" became a common
and much-used descriptive epithet. In this particular instance McPhail was able
thus to visit forty-eight of the seventy churches existing at that time,
ranging from Brighton, Portsmouth and St. Leonards on the South Coast, through
Chatham, Maidstone and Sevenoaks in Kent, to Greenock, Glasgow, and Dundee in
the Scottish lowlands, with Belfast and Dublin in Ireland. During the next few
years more pilgrims followed, Benjamin Barton in 1906, A. E. Williamson in 1907
and 1908, and Frank Draper in 1911, by which time the number of individual
churches had increased to at least 120.
In all of this
the UK brethren had by no means been idle. During the seven years 1903-1909, still
not much more than 3500 strong, they had distributed by hand more than twenty
million large four-page folders and twenty-seven thousand volumes of
"Studies in the Scriptures." Much of this work had been done by
individual brethren; the institution of Saturday afternoon "tracting
efforts" whereby parties freed from daily occupational obligations
gathered to distribute folders and tracts door-to-door over a prescribed area,
leaving the seed thus sown either to bear fruit or wither by the wayside, as
the case might be, became a practice which subsisted through the years. There
was always the element of light relief, as for instance when a somewhat
surly-looking individual, taking the proffered tract, demanded "What are
you, socialists?" "No, Bible Students!" "H’m, just as
bad!"
The work was
onerous, the tracts were not like those of modern times, a few inches each way
in size, but were the dimensions of newspapers and relatively heavy to carry in
quantity. The younger members of the fraternity adapted their bicycles (cars
were few and not possessed by many in those days and certainly not be teenagers
to carry the heavy weights of tracts; thus loaded they pedaled their way
somewhat uncertainly at imminent danger to life and limb to strategic points
from which the distributors would replenish their stocks from time to time. The
writer distinctly remembers, when thus loaded, coming a cropper on the
tramlines in the Old Kent Road, South London, on one such occasion at a much
later date, with considerable damage to the bike and some to the rider. What
happened to the tracts in not remembered.
An appreciable
part of this activity was carried on by colporteurs, a term meaning an
itinerant distributor of religious literature. From time to time, various
brethren in a position so to so, gave themselves to this work, travelling from
town to town and calling on householders to introduce what by this time was
being called "the Truth." The ordinary literature was free but a
nominal charge of one shilling (5p today) was made for the "Divine
Plan" which for a clothbound book of 350 pages was not bad even in those
days; this was to avoid frivolous acceptances and give some assurance that the
book would be valued and used. In the earlier years, 1887 to 1903, there was
not so much of this in evidence. C.H. Houston of Edinburgh traveled fairly
extensively in Scotland and on one occasion disposed of 420 volumes in fourteen
days. By 1900 there were four colporteurs in regular service and in that year a
quarter of a million books and tracts were placed in thirty-nine towns. In 1901
that output was doubled and in 1902 attained 700,00. But the real day of the
colporteurs was from 1910 onwards, when public awareness of the Bible students
was becoming general and the generally more or less Christian outlook of people
in general facilitated acceptance and a hearing ear. The visits of the Pastor
to this country and the public meetings addressed by him were evoking much
public interest and the itinerant colporteurs found much to encourage them in
their work, self-sacrificing though it was.
Going from town
to town, they had to find lodgings where they could, sometimes, but not always,
with brethren of like faith.
More often,
when in country districts, they did find themselves at times like the Master
they served, having nowhere to lay their heads. When it is realized that
between 1910 and 1915 the brethren of this country had succeeded in
distributing fifty-four million pamphlets and three-quarters of a million
volumes of "Scripture Studies" one has to accept that the achievement
meant sheer devotion to what was universally accepted a the work of Harvest—the
Harvest of the Age.
Much of the
work of these colporteurs is of necessity incapable of being put on record.
They served, in the main, largely in the background, rarely able to attach
themselves to a regular meeting and only able to fellowship with their brethren
when operating in a town where a meeting existed; the nature of their calling
meant that in the main they worked in areas where there were no meetings. It
was largely in consequence of their endeavors that new groups were formed and
regular meetings commenced. The colporteurs were of all types and from every
strata of society, having this one thing in common, the burning passion to give
themselves to the proclamation of the Gospel of the Kingdom.
There was
Archibald Rock, ex-military man, still erect and stiff as a ram-rod, who could
be seen in the period 1907-1916 in the towns and villages of South-East England
and the Home Counties. There was his brother Robert, converted prize-fighter,
still bearing physical signs of that life, who could chill the blood with
occasional reminiscences of his victories and defeats in the prize ring and
experiences on the more seamy side of London life—yet now as gentle as a child
and utterly persuasive as he went from door to door with tracts and books. Down
in the far South-West was Mabel Coombes, a diminutive semi-crippled lady of
uncertain age and the heart of a lion. Until sheer old age compelled her to
stop, she dragged herself from door to door and more than one group in Devon
and Cornwall owed its inception to her labors. And when she could do no more
she retired uncomplainingly to an old peoples’ home and went quietly to meet
her Lord in 1951. Lily Blake, not very tall, looking as if a puff of wind would
blow her away, trudged from door to door in central England through rain and
shine, unperturbed and quietly confident. Her irrepressible sense of humor
comes to the top when she recounted how on one occasion the Rector of the
parish had warned his flock in his parish magazine to "beware a little
lady with a silver tongue who is going from house to house in the village
seeking to interest people in Millennial Dawn."
For ever
afterwards Lily was referred to among the brethren as "the little lady
with the silver tongue." Albert Lloyd, whose origin was a bit of a
mystery—he used to say that he was born in the gutter and brought up in the
gutter—brought his natural exuberance of spirit to bear upon his work in the
North of England, as for example when upon one occasion, receiving no answer to
his knock but feeling certain that there was someone inside, and noticing a
butcher’s cart in the road, he reasoned that the butcher would soon be calling.
He rapped again and called through the letter-box "Meat! Meat!" and
sure enough the lady came. "Oh, I thought you were the butcher!"
"So I am, madam, and here it is. Meat in due season, for the household of
faith." Whether the lady recognized the Scriptural allusion is not
recorded, but at any rate Albert disposed of another Divine Plan.
Victoria
Wright, statuesque and every inch a lady, impressed all upon whom she called
with her reasoned and dispassionate exposition of the Divine Plan. Thomas
Stracy worked the South Coast and half a dozen groups in Southern England owed
their inauguration to his work. And despite the discomforts and hazards, the
colporteurs maintained a serene happiness which stemmed from the fact that they
were preaching a happy gospel.
The Lollards of
the Middle Ages were known in their time as "God’s glee men" because
they went about with happy faces singing praises to God. The colporteurs were
something like that.
They had a
message for all who would listen, a message of hope and happiness, good tidings
of great joy for all people, and it had to shine out from their faces. In these
later more prosaic times it must be difficult for anyone who never knew those
days to visualize the spirit of spontaneous joy which animated these who went
out with the news of earth’s coming glory.
In 1894 there
was one colporteur in full time service, in 1900 there were four. By 1913 there
were ninety-three and every part of the country was being covered. The modest
book depot which had been started in North London in 1891 under the supervision
of Thomas Hart, one of the elders, had long since been outgrown by successive
moves, first to Forest Gate an then to Eversholt Street; by 1911 it was in more
commodious premises at Craven Terrace, Paddington, and the demands of the
colporteurs for more and more supplies were taxing even those facilities. A
major portion of the 130,000 volumes of "Scripture Studies" which
went out in that year were placed by the efforts of the colporteurs, not to
speak of several millions of pamphlets on various subjects which also went into
the hands of the public.
It was
inevitable that the fervor of the brethren, coupled with their steadily
increasing numbers, should begin to call for the holding of conventions in the
principal cities, usually lasting several days and at a public holiday time, at
which the tenets of the Faith could be expounded from the platform coupled with
exhortations to Christian living and reflections on the signs of the times in
connection with proclaimed expectations of the imminent Millennium. Such
conventions remained, and still remain, a feature of the fellowship. After the
memorable London and Glasgow conventions associated with Brother Russell’s
second visit to this country in 1903 the pattern was set; national conventions
were held year by year in London and Glasgow, and commencing in 1907,
Manchester, which by then boasted more than three hundred members with a
considerable number of small groups located in adjacent towns. What had by now
become an accepted feature of church life in the growing community was
maintained by similar conventions in 1908 and.1909, and thus the ground was
laid for what was probably the most momentous year in the history of the
movement—1910.
1910 became
legendary. It was the year of the Royal Albert Hall meetings at which Brother
Russell, on his fifth visit to England, caught the imagination of the British
public. Nothing like it had ever been seen before; nothing like it was ever
seen again. The conventions of that year were associated with public meetings
attended by thousands of people, and the brethren caught the infection. Public
meetings there had been previously, from 1908 onwards, in cities like Bristol,
where Brother Russell spoke to a thousand people on "The Overthrow of
Satan’s Empire," at St.
Andrews Hall,
Glasgow, to nearly five thousand on "The Return from Hell," and in
four or five other cities with a combined attendance of eight thousand. It was in
1908 that a somewhat humorous episode occurred when A.E. Williamson, one of
Brother Russell’s colleagues accompanying him, was giving a similar public
lecture at Otley. Otley was a small mining village not far from Bradford, and
in the early 1900s six Methodist ministers and lay preachers in the vicinity
had all accepted the Truth and commenced a group. This coupled with the visit
of the American preacher, evoked the villagers’ interest, and the local
reporter, making the usual inquiries appropriate to his calling, misheard the
appellation "Millennial Dawnists" as "Aluminum Dawnists,"
by which name the brethren at Otley were, locally, for a long time subsequently
known.
This activity
continued throughout 1908 when Brother Russell addressed three thousand at
Manchester after the Manchester brethren had distributed 150,000 leaflets
advertising the meeting, another two thousand in the City Hall, Glasgow,
twenty-five hundred in Edinburgh and twelve hundred in London. All this was
only a "run-up" to the most eventful year of public meetings the
brethren were to know.
In May of 1910
a party of American brethren arrived in England with Brother Russell—his fifth
visit—for the purpose of conducting a planned series of public meetings all
over the country commencing with the Royal Albert Hall in London. The party was
preceded by one of his co-workers, G.C. Driscoll, who was also an official of
the USA press Association; his presence was for the purpose of enlisting the
co-operation of the British Press. A month later the main party, which had been
on the Continent, arrived and were met by a hundred brethren of the London
community, headed by one of its most active elders, John Gentle. The church had
put out three-quarters of a million large four-page leaflets advertising the
Albert Hall meetings and were ready for the fray.
The first
meeting at the Albert Hall was on May 8. Seven thousand five hundred people
packed the auditorium to hear Brother Russell. The occasion was a somber one,
for King Edward VII had died the previous day and the nation was in mourning.
The advertised subject was "The Great Hereafter" and the mood of the
people was to listen.
The Chairman of
the meeting was Brother (Colonel) Sawyer, a bluff old soldier who had known the
Truth for a number of years and had the habit, in private conversion, of
referring to Brother Russell as "the Archbishop" and to Jesse Hemery,
now manager of the London literature depot as the bishop of London." After
the opening hymn he introduced the speaker, "Pastor Russell, of Brooklyn
Tabernacle, New York, a well-known preacher of the Gospel, and author of
‘Studies in the Scriptures’." Pastor Russell, he said, "magnified and
illuminated the majestic Plan of God, the mind and purpose of God in creation,
the fall, the redemption, the restoration, perfection and salvation of the
human race, through the name and merit of our Lord and Savior Jesus
Christ."
Before
commencing his address, the Pastor referred to the death of the King the
previous day, and expressed his sympathy. He suggested that as a mark of
respect his hearers should stand silently for a minute. The entire concourse
rose in their seats and stood, quietly, until the voice of the Pastor was heard
unpraised in prayer, and then, the tones of the great organ pealing what was
said to be the deceased King’s favorite hymn, "Nearer, my God, to
thee."
Only then did
Pastor Russell commence his discourse, to which the vast audience listened with
marked attention. At its end, and after the closing prayer and the benediction,
the audience started for the doors. Their progress was suddenly arrested. The
organist, Brother Thomas Stracy, commenced to render the "Dead March in
Saul," a final tribute to the late King. The entire concourse stood still
with bowed heads until the music died away, and then, as it was recorded at the
time, remained still "in a silence so profound that it was necessary to
pronounce the benediction again in order to disperse them." So ended the
most momentous witness to the coming Kingdom that has ever been known in the
history of the movement.
Two more
meetings were held in the Albert Hall on the two following Sundays, with
attendances of 6000 and 5000 respectively, to hear the Pastor speak on
"Millennial Refreshing" and "The Overthrow of Satan’s Empire."
Five months
later he returned to England to address a second series of Albert Hall
meetings. The response was equal to that of the first occasion. For three
Sundays in succession he faced increasing audiences; 4000 to hear "God’s
Message to the Jews," 6000 for "God’s Message to Christendom,"
and 7600 for "The Great White Throne." Public interest was such that
nearly seven hundred British newspapers carried reports of the meetings,
quoting his words at greater or lesser length. It was obvious that something
more had to be done and so six further meetings were advertised for local areas
in London; the Pastor addressed these at Acton Baths, Alexandra Palace,
Bermondsey Town Hall, East Ham Town Hall, and Woolwich Town Hall. The
attendances at these local meetings ranged between six hundred to twelve
hundred at each venue.
All this
activity gave reason for holding a national convention of the brethren in
London, which, in order to accommodate the numbers who would be attending, was
held in Whitefield’s Old Tabernacle in City Road, Central London. Here Pastor
Russell addressed the conventioneers from the pulpit in which both George
Whitefield and John Wesley had preached in the 18 th century.
The rest of the
country was not neglected. Between these two sets of meetings Brother Russell
toured the country, meeting with enthusiastic responses both from the brethren
and the public at each place he visited. A convention at Glasgow mustered five
hundred brethren and over 3000 at the public meeting; Manchester, now a rapidly
growing community, contributed four hundred brethren and two public meetings of
over one thousand at each. Some half dozen other Midland cities together with
Belfast and Dublin were visited with public meetings at each place, and so a
memorable year came to its close.
One of the
consequences of the 1910 meetings was the onset of the "newspaper
work." The noticeable increase of public interest in the message and work
of Pastor Russell soon brought the daily Press to the doorstep and it was indicated
that the British newspaper world would by no means be averse to featuring his
sermons in their columns. The consequence was that a syndicate was set up with
an office in the Strand, London, fulfilling the function of receiving the
sermons as they were preached in USA or England, and distributing them to every
daily and weekly newspaper in the scheme.
Commencing in
1910, by the end of 1911 no less than three hundred national dailies and
provincial weeklies were publishing the sermons at length as a regular feature
and the combined number of copies of such papers reached a maximum of twelve
millions annually which implied that virtually every newspaper reader in the
country came into contact with the message. Many thousands of inquiries were
received in the London office in consequence. The onset of the 1914 war with
its paper shortages began to limit the scale of this witness, but it continued
during the ensuing ten years in diminishing volume, eventually developing into
a system whereby local churches and individuals found local paper editors who
were willing to accept news and details of their activities and special
functions for their columns and this practice continued for many years
thereafter......It is impossible to say how many people thus received and
believed the message without avowedly throwing in their lot with the Bible
Students. The number of known active members of the movement bears no relation
to the number of those who believed, attended meetings when they could, and
carried the vision with them to the end of their days. Workers in later years
frequently came into contact with such, who had the "Scripture
Studies" on their bookshelves and still avowed belief. The fruits of the
Harvest were by no means confined to those who became "members of the
brethren." There were many thousands of others.
The
euphoria created by these events was now to give rise to a significant
proposal. The London Church was the largest and most influential in the
country. It comprised eight mutually independent self-governing churches in
various parts of the Metropolis. Brother Russell was now to suggest that they
combined forces to establish an impressive congregation in a appropriate
building in Central London—and so events moved forward to the opening of the
London Tabernacle.
3 The London
Tabernacle
THE RISING tide
of enthusiasm in this country, especially in the London area, following the
Albert Hall meetings, led Brother Russell to consider the merit of establishing
a central London church of repute which should stand as a visible symbol of the
Faith and a rallying point for those in Britain who had espoused it. The two
principal centers were London and Glasgow, followed closely by Manchester. As
the national capital, London was the obvious choice, and one object of the
Pastor’s visit in 1911 was to find and acquire such a church and see it
established. By now the London brethren numbered in all something like three
hundred at Forest Gate and eight hundred spread over the eight area groups
affiliated together as the London Church, —Lewisham alone is known to have
exceeded 100 in 1911, and while the original North London group was still the
largest, most of the others did not fall far short of Lewisham.
The meeting at Eversholt
Street where the Society now had its headquarters was the smallest but had
outgrown its capacity; altogether London had the largest congregation of Bible
Students of any city in the country.
So Jesse Hemery
found himself accompanying the Pastor on a tour of London in the search for a
suitable building. Jesse himself must have felt some satisfaction at the turn
of events.
Eversholt
Street was by no means in the most salubrious part of London and he may well
have embarked upon the quest with visions of a fine church building in a
high-class quarter with himself as pastor-in-charge. If there were any such
dreams they were rather rudely shattered when the Pastor found a place which he
thought would be an admirable choice for the purpose.
That building
was the Ring at Blackfriars, south of the Thames, in an area compared with
which even Eversholt Street would seem palatial by comparison. The Ring was a
large circular building built and used for boxing tournaments, and at the
relevant time was apparently up for sale. Why it took the Pastor’s fancy is a
bit of a puzzle maybe its circular shape reminded him of the Albert Hall, but
there the resemblance ended. As a solution to the problem it was entirely
unsuitable; the fact that it was on the south side of the river and all the
main line railway terminals save one were on the north side would have made
access very difficult. Jesse Hemery lost no time in steering the Pastor to a
more congenial area, the West End.
Here they met
with better fortune. Craven Hill Congregational Chapel was for sale. About a
mile west of Marble Arch, adjacent to Hyde Park, it was in the center of
Bayswater, at that time a favored residential area for the "higher
up." Better still, the mansion adjacent to the Chapel, 34 Craven Terrace,
was available for lease, an ideal location for the Society’s headquarters.
Negotiations were entered into and quite soon the building was acquired and
renamed the London Tabernacle.
Built, it is
believed, about 1750-1800, the Tabernacle (it is not there now) was a typical
Nonconformist place of worship of the period. The seating capacity was 1200.
Three short flights of steps led up from the street to three arched double
entrance doors. The center one gave access to an inner vestibule from which two
doors led into the Tabernacle proper. The doors on right and left led into
lobbies giving access to the interior and also to two stairways each, one
leading up to the gallery, which surrounded the auditorium on three sides, and
the other down to a lower storey known as the "schoolroom" extending
over the whole area of the tabernacle. One lobby also gave access to a long
room flanking one side of the building, useful for auxiliary purposes. Below
ground, similarly flanking the schoolroom, there were other rooms, store-rooms,
kitchen premises and other amenities, and a baptismal pool. At the front end,
below the pulpit, the auditorium widened out at each side into two flanks
furnished with seating at right angles to the center portion, the gallery following
suit. The pulpit, raised fairly high, projected from the front of a
semi-circular alcove large enough to seat ten or twenty people, (as often
happened at conventions) approached by a stairway. Thus the officiating
minister was surrounded by his congregation on three sides, and sometimes by a
fourth at his rear.
The London
ecclesias—with the exception of Forest Gate-fell in with the suggestion that
they closed down their separate identities and amalgamated to form one
congregation at the Tabernacle for weekly worship. This meant that instead of
eight distinct churches, each having its own affairs, there was one single and
much larger ecclesia incorporating all the elders and deacons of its
constituent fellowships. Sunday evening meetings were still held in several
suburbs for the benefit of those who could not travel to the center and there
were a number of week-night meetings in various suburban districts associated
with the Tabernacle. The intent was to gather a large and impressive
congregation associated with a well-appointed b building in a superior part of
London to facilitate the work of spreading the good tidings.
It is to be
feared that in the enthusiasm of the moment the brethren failed to remember the
Apostle’s warning against "making a fair show in the flesh," that
development into a large and powerful organization with vested interests can
bring its own problems. Five years later some of them began to wonder if it had
been such a good idea after all.
Forest Gate did
not join in the coalition. The Pastor tried to talk them into it and seemed
unable to grasp their argument that to uproot an established Church of three
hundred people in order to attend another Church on the opposite side of London
to the detriment of their evangelical work in their own district was hardly the
wisest use of their resources. It was left to one of the elders, Alex Guy, to
try the diplomatic approach. He suggested that Brother Russell accompany him on
a trial journey from Forest Gate to the Tabernacle. The Pastor fell right into
this one.
By the time he
had traveled by bus from Forest Gate to the nearest Underground station, thence
to the City, a longish walk to the Bank Tube station, thence by Central London
line to Lancaster Gate, and walked round to the Tabernacle, Brother Russell was
completely exhausted. "I had no idea London was so big" he told Alex
Guy. "I quite agree with you that your brethren could not be expected to
make such a journey every Sunday." So London henceforward possessed two
main centers, Forest Gate for East London and London Tabernacle for North, West
and South. (It has to be admitted that many of the South London brethren had
even longer journeys to the Tabernacle; for some it meant two hours or more,
morning and evening.) The inaugural meeting of the newly opened church was held
on April 3rd, 1911, Pastor Russell being the preacher. He had already, in 1910,
been invited by unanimous vote to become the Pastor of the London Church and
now the Tabernacle was to be the seat of that Church and now the Tabernacle was
to be the seat of that Church and his Pastorate. In view of his commitments—he
was already Pastor of the Brooklyn Tabernacle and the New York City Temple—he
expected to be in this country only for two periods in each year. This arrangement
was perfectly satisfactory to the London Church which already had plenty of
able elders available to conduct the meetings and guide their destinies.
Brother Russell’s Pastorate was very largely an honorary one.
The British
Press was interested in this development and gave it good publicity. The
national "Daily News" of April 18th, 1911, came out with a full-page
account on page 3 with pictures of the Tabernacle and its Pastor. Under the
caption "Timely interview and statement from Pastor Russell, London and
Brooklyn" the leader-writer said, in part, "On Easter Sunday, in the
London Tabernacle, Pastor Russell, of the Brooklyn Tabernacle, and a figure of
international reputation and influence, became the official head of a large
London congregation of Christians, thus securing an admirable center of
proposed religious activity...At the Sunday morning session, Pastor Russell
formally accepted the pastorate of the London congregation...following this,
Pastor Russell delivered his Easter sermon on ‘The Resurrection’ ..." Both
the words of acceptance, the Easter sermon, and his answers to the
interviewer’s questions respecting his message and work, were reproduced in
full, covering the complete page of seventeen by twenty-four inches, the usual
size of daily papers in those days, seven columns wide. The interview, thus
widely disseminated over London and the country, rendered the London Tabernacle
well known overnight.
The "Daily
Graphic" of April 8 said "Pastor Russell, who for a number of years
has been a frequent visitor to our shores...has accepted the pastorate of the
London Tabernacle. The advent of Pastor Russell brings to this city an country
a man of international reputation who is known almost as well in Great Britain
as he is in America...Reputed to be the most popular preacher in America, it is
noteworthy that he should become prominently identified with religious effort
in England...We see the wonderful opportunity for doing good enjoyed by Pastor
Russell, and there is every prospect that Londoners will be greatly benefited
by his coming..." Said the "Daily Chronicle" under the caption
"American Spurgeon; Pastor Russell’s new work at Paddington
Tabernacle."
"Pastor
Russell, of the Brooklyn Tabernacle, known as the ‘American Spurgeon,’ has accepted
a call from the congregation of the London Tabernacle, Paddington...It is hoped
to make the Paddington church the center of carefully organized and sustained
evangelistic effort for the metropolis on the lines which for many years made
Spurgeon’s Tabernacle in south London one of the largest and most powerful
agencies of religious endeavor and social reform in this country..." The
"London Globe" with a heading "American minister for
London" had this to say: "Pastor Russell, of New York, has accepted
the pastorate of the London Tabernacle, located at Lancaster Gate, W, and is to
officially assume his new duties on the 16 th inst....".The
"Christian World" contributed "Pastor Russell, of Brooklyn
Tabernacle, ... has accepted the pastorate of the London Tabernacle,
Paddington, which will be the London headquarters of his work...Mr. Russell
will give as much time to his work in London as his other engagements
permit."
And just so
that America know all about it, the London representative of the "New York
Herald" cabled an account of his head office in New York which appeared in
the issue of April 17. He said, in part, "Brooklyn Pastor in pulpit of the
London Tabernacle. The Rev. Charles Taze Russell begins Pastorate in British
City." "The Rev. Charles Taze Russell, known as Pastor Russell of
Brooklyn, has accepted the pastorate of the London Tabernacle. Mr. Russell, who
is now here, hopes to make the Paddington church the center of a great
religious effort on lines similar to those of Dr. Charles Spurgeon, the famous
Pastor of South London Tabernacle. Mr. Russell occupied the pulpit of his new
church this afternoon, preaching on the subject of the Resurrection..."
With all this publicity, coupled with the effect of the Albert Hall meetings of
the previous year, which at that time had also been fully reported in the
newspapers, the London Tabernacle got off to a flying start. The congregation,
which amounted to about eight hundred at the start, increased fairly rapidly
and by 1916 was the largest congregation of Bible Students in the world,
approaching the fifteen hundred mark. In that later year there were nineteen
elders and over fifty deacons serving the varied interests and undertakings of
an active community. The 1200 seating capacity of the Tabernacle—fifty per cent
greater than Brother Russell’s own Brooklyn Tabernacle—also made it the largest
Bible Students’ church building in the world, then or since.
One of the
earliest projects of the new amalgamation was a kind of intensive seminar on
Bible archaeology within the precincts of the British Museum. One of the London
deacons, Wordsworth Jones, Oriental prizewinner of Durham University, held an
official position at the Museum, and was able to initiate and carry out a
scheme whereby all who would of the congregation could be conducted around and
have the exhibits explained from the Biblical standpoint as they went, in a
much more thorough and detailed fashion than was afforded by the usual public
conducted tours. By way of a start he selected six able deacons and gave them a
thorough briefing on the technical aspects of the subject. They in turn
conducted successive parties of brethren round the Museum to the satisfaction
of all concerned.
Something like
three hundred brethren enjoyed this facility during 1912 and the practice
continued in lessening degree for four or five years thereafter. It is true
that some of the co-relations of exhibits with Bible history have proved
unjustified in the light of discoveries of half a century later, but this was,
even then, no new phenomenon, neither it is now. The value of Wordsworth Jones’
initiative was in its effect of relating the discoveries of science to the
historical aspect of the Bible, and interpreting them in the light of the then
modern knowledge, all of which constituted them an invaluable aid to faith, one
which many Christians ignore or disparage to their disadvantage.
The continuing
increase in the volume of work handled by the London office of the Society, now
located at 34 Craven Terrace, adjacent to the Tabernacle, necessitated a
corresponding increase in managerial effort; there was more to be done than
Jesse Hemery with a few assistants could handle unaided. The establishment of
the tabernacle therefore became the occasion for Brother Russell to appoint two
co-managers to constitute a managerial triumvirate of three, to reside at 34
Craven Terrace and administer the work from there. His choice for the two new
managers fell on two well-known and respected brethren, William Crawford and
Henry Shearn. These two were to figure very prominently in later history.
William
Crawford had been a member of the first Glasgow church, established in 1882—he
probably joined it about 1885—and was an elder of the enlarged Glasgow church
when the Edgars came on the scene in 1897, until 1911 when he left that city to
take up his new duties in London. Henry Shearn, a London business man, first
came into contact with the "Divine Plan" in 1906 and entered into
close correspondence with Brother Russell; he entertained the latter at his
home on that time of contact retired from his business, donated money to the
Society to further its work, settled his family in a Somerset cottage, and took
up full-time colporteur service traveling the country spreading the message.
During this period he held office as an elder in the Bristol church. Now, in
1911, he came to London to reside with his family at 34 Craven Terrance, and
found himself fully occupied supervising the Pilgrim work among the brethren
and the Newspaper work, the publishing of articles and sermons on the faith in
daily and weekly newspapers all over the country.
The acquirement
of the London Tabernacle brought to the surface various legal questions
regarding the holding of property; in order to resolve these questions and
others connected with a work of increasing magnitude, a British organization to
be called the International Bible Students Association was created. This name
had been used to some extent in an informal fashion in the United States since
1910 to denote work carried on by individual churches as distinct from the
Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, which legally was a purely business
organization under US law for the publishing and distribution of Biblical
literature.
The
International Bible Students Association was to serve the same purpose under
British law and it was formally incorporated in London on 30 June 1914 under
the Companies Act of 1908..Its officers and trustees comprised C. T. Russell
(President), J. Hemery (Vice President), H.J. Shearn (Secretary) and W.
Crawford
(Treasurer). The practical effect was to put the entire work in Great Britain
under British control with the paternal oversight of C. T. Russell and the
Society providing literature. In practice, of course, since there was no dissent
from the leadership of Brother Russell, the UK and USA, organizations worked
together in perfect harmony and the IBSA became looked upon as an adjunct to
the main Society.
Brother
Russell’s last visit to this country was in 1914. After this year public
lectures were organized by practically every local church in their own
vicinities with varying degrees of success.
Through the
years of the first World War conditions were obviously not conducive to this
kind of activity and it was very largely scaled down. After the war it was
renewed and at first was as effective as in former times. In London a highly
organized campaign of sets of four successive weekly lectures followed by the
endeavor to establish a regular local meeting in the area resulted in such
local meetings in north, south, and west London sheeting up from eighteen upon
the establishment of the Tabernacle in 1911 to over sixty in 1916. These public
lectures were often not without their humorous side, as for instance when
Hubert Thackway was due to address an audience of a thousand at a large West
London cinema (cinemas did not open on Sundays in those days hence were always
available, at a price, for public meetings). Upon arrival at the venue, the
appointed Chairman found to his dismay that there was no platform. The screen
came down sheer to the floor with a space in front bounded by a brass rail six
feet high carrying a blue curtain behind which the orchestra sat. (In the days
of silent films an orchestra or pianist, according to the size of the cinema,
lout of sight of audience, played appropriate music as the film proceeded.) A
hasty search of the premises yielded nothing more than a kitchen table and a
rather rickety chair. There was nothing for it but to make use of the materials
available and hope for the best. At the time of opening the meeting the
audilence sat, gazing at the blue curtain surmounted by a white screen. There
appeared, just above the rail, a head—a head, incidentally, acutely conscious
of its position. A moment’s lapse, and then, rather uncertainly, due to the
rather uncertain state of the chair, the head rose several feet into the air to
reveal the upper part of its associated body. The customary procedure ensued,
the audience was introduced to Mr. Thackway, who unfortunately was not visible
because he was down below, behind the curtain.
Another head
appeared, surveying the, by now, rather bemused, audience impassively. A short
interval, and the relevant body.
For the next
hour and a half Hubert Thackway had to remember that he was not on a platform
but on a kitchen table which threatened to go to pieces under his not
inconsiderable weight at any moment.
The lecture
ended, the body disappeared, followed by its head.
The first one appeared
again, and then its body. The usual things were said; it was hoped the audience
had enjoyed the evening’s proceedings—they probably had—and would those who
would like to know more leave their names with on eof the ushers at the doors.
Then the body disappeared, and the head. The chair held out gallantly to the
last.
This was the
kind of incident that provided light relief at subsequent Sunday meetings when
the faithful enquired "how did the lecture go?"—as for example when
Theodore Seeck went to a village hall on the outskirts of London with his
chairman, again to find there was no platform and only a table the condition of
which rendered it a dead cert that if put into use the lecture would certainly
experience a premature and catastrophic conclusion. The only other solid object
available was a dead palm tree in a large pot. The chairman concerned, being at
the time still technically a teenager, had no hesitation in ripping out the
tree from its pot and standing his speaker on the earth, in the pot, behind the
table hidden by a table-cloth. The speaker was under the unfortunate necessity
of standing as stiff and as still as a statue during the entire course of his
lecture and all would have been well if the pot, halfway through, had not begun
to wobble.
The chairman h
ad to take remedial action for the rest of the meeting by kneeling on the
floor, behind the pot, below the speaker, hidden by the table-cloth, hold the
pot firmly to avoid a catastrophe. It is uncertain who was the more exhausted
at the end of the lecture, speaker or chairman.
These public
meetings were approached and carried through in a spirit of light-heartedness
because the message they proclaimed was one of joy and happiness. There was no
"flee from the wrath to come" element in the proclamation, no
threatening the terrors of Hell for the non-believer. The evangel was one of
hope and comfort, one which exalted both the Love and Wisdom of God, and
extended a hope to all mankind, one which made sense of the apparent paradox
that a world of evil and disease and death can exist contemporaneously with the
existence of an all-loving and all-powerful God. Plenty of people came to these
meetings and went away with a new hope in their lives even if they did not
there and then throw in their lot with the Bible Students. Plenty looked out
for the announcements of these public meetings and went to them time and again.
The enthusiasm of the brethren and an increasing response on the part of the
public combined to make the years from 1910 to 1916 the best ever. Attendances
in the larger towns of the size of, say, Plymouth, Tunbridge Wells, Cheltenham,
Hull, York, Stirling, were recorded from one thousand to fifteen hundred, the
small towns registered five hundred upwards. Glasgow in 1913 had a meeting
attended by six thousand with over eight hundred enquiries at its close for
further information and contact. In the same year over three thousand crowded
into Manchester Hippodrome, many of whom.stood for two hours listening to the
speaker, even then hundreds were turned away.
The light
relief continued. A meeting at Nottingham towards the end of this period was
being addressed by one J. Faulds Ross who possessed the distinction of having
been a professional actor before he came into contact with the Truth. He
brought his dramatic skill with him and it colored his style of delivery so
that the brethren in Nottingham know what to expect. Now one of the sisters
possessed a small son who was renowned for mischief—a not unusual trait. He
wanted to come to the meeting—most of the speakers had a style free from the
sanctimonious which rendered them appealing to the very young as well as to
their elders. He was allowed to come after the exaction of a promise that there
would be no mischief. So the meeting opened in the usual manner and the speaker
warmed to his subject. He came at length to the point where he dwelt up the
sufferings endured by men of God in Old Testament times memorable passage in
the Book of Hebrews, he told how their relentless enemies pursued and harried
them from place to place, tortured them and put them to death; "they were
stoned" he declaimed, striking a characteristic pose" they were sawn
asunder, were slain with the sword. They wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins,
being destitute, afflicted, tormented. They wandered in deserts, and in
mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth!" He stopped for dramatic
effect and fixed his gaze on his spell-bound audience, and there was a great
silence.
And into that
silence, from high up at the rear of the gallery there came a clear, incisive
voice, reaching to all parts of the building.
"Villains!"
it said..
And the spell
was broken.
There is no
record of what happened when the small boy got home. He must at any rate have
been listening intently to the lecture.
A variant style
of meeting was initiated by the brethren in South Wales. They were mostly
miners in the coal fields and not sufficiently endowed with this world’s goods
to engage large halls with all the outlay for extras entailed. They took to the
mountain-sides outside the villages and held open-air meetings, night after
night, with crowded audiences. For many years afterwards every South Wales town
and village had its local community of Bible Students.
To some extent
this great accession of public interest would have been due in part to the
imminence of the widely proclaimed year 1914 which was expected to witness the
commencement of the period of transition from the world as it now is to the
world presided over by the Lord Christ at his Advent and the coming of the
Millennium. Although the faithful were led to expect this transition to be
effected over a much shorter period of time than has proved to be the case, the
fact that the initial phase, the onset of devastating world war, predicted
thirty years earlier, did occur right on time, had a profound effect; even the
scoffers were temporarily silenced, and interest in the message continued
relatively unabated during the dark years of the war, limited only by the
effect of war conditions upon such functions as public meetings. Looking back
from the vantage point of the closing years of the century, it is realized that
C.T. Russell was correct enough in his expectations except that the program has
taken, or more correctly taken, or more correctly is taking, a century to work
out instead of the expected ten years. No one familiar with his writings can
deny that the world, politically, religiously, economically, and ecologically,
is in just that state he foresaw nearly a century ago.
At this time,
from about 1915 onward, there came what was called the "Class Extension
Work". This was a planned arrangement directed to organize new regular
group meetings particularly in the suburbs of the cities. By 1911 there were
about a hundred and fifty regular groups meeting in "classes" or
"churches" aggregating nearly five thousand brethren and the effect
of the 1910 meetings was such as to inspire all these to follow that up by a
further concerted evangelical outreach.
The general
system was to hold a series of four or five successive weekly Sunday public
meetings in a suitable hall at which salient features of the Faith were
propounded. At the end of the series announcement was made from the platform
asking if anyone present was prepared to offer their home for a regular
discussion group on these themes—half a century later some of the established
denominations tried the same innovation and have met with much the same
successful outcome. Almost always an offer—sometimes two or three—would be
forthcoming and all interested were invited to attend. Several of the mature
brethren would be present at the start to organize and direct the general trend
of such a meeting; after perhaps a year or so the attendants would be
sufficiently mature to take over the oversight themselves. This was always the
objective and so a new fully-fledged fellowship was born. Most of the larger
city churches embarked on this activity on a fairly large scale with eminently
encouraging results. Four fellowships on the North-East coast in the
Newcastle-Hartlepool area held fourteen sets of such meetings in 1912 and in
consequence twelve new fellowships were formed having a total new membership of
over two hundred, some of these in later years grew to memberships of a hundred
or more each. To advertise these meetings nearly half a million pamphlets were
distributed, more than three thousand people attended and nearly a thousand
"Divine Plan" volumes were taken by the more definitely interested of
these.
Glasgow a year
later had much the same experience. Seventeen sets of meetings attended by
three thousand people in response to a leaflet distribution of three hundred
thousand yielded six new fellowships. London conducted these Class Extension
meetings on a generous scale; throughout 1915 to 1920 they were always being
held in one area or another of the Metropolis, the scale of London suburbia
offering plenty of scope. By 1917 there were more than seventy local weeknight
meetings in North, West, and South London affiliated to the London Church and
something like fifteen in East London with the Forest Gate Church. The effect
of Brother Russell’s 1910 visit and the Albert hall meetings was still in
evidence.
The newly converted
often caught the infection and started out on their own on a basis of
enthusiasm untempered by experience.
An infant
fellowship in a Hampshire town round about 1922 resolved to pass on the good
news themselves in a neighboring village and appealed to London for help by
providing a speaker.
Came an urgent
message from the office to one of the London elders on a Saturday afternoon
requesting him to go to the village concerned the next day to deliver said
lecture, arrangements in the hands of local brethren. Never having heard of the
place, recourse to appropriate works of reference revealed it as located in
Hampshire. It had a railway station and the service was once in three hours. It
was a January day, bitterly cold, and the snow was on the ground. When the
hapless elder got out of the train he looked around and saw no village, just
snow-covered fields, snow-covered trees, and one snow-covered cottage, bearing
the magic sign "teas". Enquiry at the cottage revealed that the
village was a mile away. On the basis of the sign further enquiry elicited that
the only available beverage was Horlick’s Malted Milk. On the principle that
beggars cannot be choosers the same was duly furnished and consumed. Then came
the walk to the village, which when reached presented the usual collection of
cottages, a church, and inn, and a village hall, all shut and no sign of life
anywhere. There was, however, a notice on the village hall door announcing the
meeting, so the—by now rather cold—speaker knew that he was in the right place.
But no sign of any brethren. And still a couple of hours to meeting time.
I n the
circumstances it seemed the only thing was to return to the cottage. There was
at least a fire there. And Horlick’s Malted Milk.
Two Malted
Milks later the return to the village began. It was still lifeless. And still
cold. And still no brethren. And the door still locked. The speaker recalled
that one of the Christian virtues is patience. So he waited.
Half an hour
before advertised starting time a motor coach drew up, and out tumbled a dozen
people. This was the responsible fellowship and this their very first public
lecture. And they themselves were the first to admit that they had not the
faintest idea how to go about it.
Fortunately,
they had got the key. The party trooped in. It was as cold inside as out. It
was explained to the faithful that one could hardly expect people to be at
their best listening to a Bible lecture when the air temperature was more or
less below freezing point. A quick search revealed several portable paraffin
heaters in a back room and before long several stalwart countrymen were walking
around the hall swinging the heaters like censers at imminent risk of setting
the whole place on fire.
People started
coming in. It was necessary to get ready. Enquiry was made as to which of them
was to act as chairman and introduce the speaker. They had not thought of that.
Finally one brother decided that as he was the leader in their studies he had
better be the chairman. Progress!
"Have you
been a chairman before?" "No." "Do you know what a chairman
does?" "No." "Have you ever spoken to people from a
platform before?" "No." He began to look a little apprehensive.
Perhaps the
progress was a little illusory.
A quick retreat
to the little room where the heaters had been found, and a careful instruction
that exactly at the starting time he should precede the speaker on to the
platform, explain to the audience who he and his colleagues were, a little
fellowship of Bible Students with a message, and that Mr—from London would now
speak to them on the advertised subject. He should remain seated on the
platform until the lecture was ended, and then announce that anyone interested
in receiving further information should give their names to one of the ushers.
The speaker found himself fervently hoping that there would be some ushers. In
the meantime the chairman should slip down to the door to welcome the people in
and come back five minutes before time to be ready. He vanished.
Came five minutes
before starting time. No chairman. Came starting time. No chairman. A slight
change of routine appeared to be indicated. The speaker emerged from his hiding
place and walked alone to the rostrum, did all that the chairman should have
done, and commenced his talk. A few minutes later the door at the end of the
hall opened slightly, a face appeared, surveyed the well-filled hall, and was a
quickly withdrawn. The missing chairman!
The meeting
ended; the audience left. A few lingered behind to ask a question or two of the
speaker. Upon finally emerging, he was just in time to see the party of
organizing brethren climbing into their motor-coach and away. A local
inhabitant was waiting with the key to lock the hall. And the village was as it
had been, devoid of life, and the Londoner standing in the snow..Back to the
station to find no train due for another two hours.
Another
Horlicks Malted Milk and finally the train—but that speaker retained an
anitpathy to Horlick’s Malted Milk for a long time thereafter.
In justice to
those zealous brethren, they became a well-established and well-known
fellowship, and later exchanged with him reminiscences of their first public
meeting.
During these years
of intense activity the London Tabernacle Church, being the largest in the
country—by 1916 notching up to twelve hundred at the Sunday evening
services—and closely associated with the office of the Society next door,
became automatically involved in much of the witness work carried on in the
southern part of the country, as Glasgow equally was towards the northern part
and in Scotland. At least six hundred of the twelve hundred were in attendance
at the Tabernacle all day every Sunday and a system of providing meals—of a
sort—had to be and was introduced. These were the acme of simplicity,
comprising corned beef sandwiches and tea or in the afternoon recess, all
provided by the labors of a large force of deacons and other men helpers. For a
great many brethren this was their unvaried Sunday fare for many years. No one
took this amiss since all who came for the day came for the meetings and the
hurried snack was just a necessary interlude. It is doubtful if many of them
knew what they were eating, which may have been just as well, especially when
during the ward for a time corned beef became unavailable and was replaced by a
supply, from an unknown source, of tinned rabbit, which, found to be complete
with small bones, was cheerfully put through the mincing machine inclusive of
said bones and so turned into sandwiches. So far as is known, no one ever
noticed. (It does have to be admitted that for a long time thereafter among the
brethren of Southern England the expression "Tabernacle sandwich" had
a particular technical—or is it gastronomic—connotation and it may be that the
clients were in fact more observant than the caterers assumed.) So far as the
caterers were concerned—-erected by a committee of half-a-dozen youthful
deacons, led by an equally youthful elder, their duty was interpreted as the
ability to get the congregation downstairs into the schoolroom, seated on long
benches with cup, saucer and plate on laps, feed them with sandwiches and tea,
and get them back upstairs to their places in good time for the next meeting.
Provided that
this eminently desirable result was being achieved, the higher authorities took
little interest in, and had little knowledge of, what went on down below,
which, for the sake of their peace of mind, was, had they known it, a good
thing.
One other
incident in the history of this period deserves mention.
It was only an
isolated incident but it high-lighted an important principle of which
enlightened Bible Students were fully aware but which in the ardor of the times
tended to be overlooked.
Towards the end
of this decade Jesse Hemery suggested to the elders that in view of the
location of the tabernacle in the best residential part of London there ought
to be an effort to reach the higher strata of society, the lords and ladies of
the land, the captains and the Kings, so to speak, by means of a special
invitation to a special Sunday evening service at which he himself would
expound the message of Present Truth in a manner they would understand and
appreciate. None would dispute that he would be fully capable for the task.
Hemery was a
superb orator and could—and did—hold the largest audience spell-bound for an
hour or more as he expounded the Scriptures. The suggestion was hailed as a
good idea and plans laid to put it into effect. In the ardour of the moment no
one remembered that the Apostle Paul tried this out on the upper-crust senators
and philosophers of Athens on one noteworthy occasion and the outcome of that
experiment was, as he remarked to the considerable lower-class Corinthians
later on, that he felt that he would be much better employed preaching Christ
to the down-and-outs.
At any rate,
the plans went ahead. Handsomely ornate printed invitations were sent to Lord
this and Lady that, to Dukes and Duchesses, Knights of the Garter, army
generals, naval admirals, princes of the Church, anyone with a title, to hear
Jesse Hemery preach on the message of hope for the world and the solution of
its troubles, presented in the Bible. Enough invitations went out to ensure a
"full house" of visitors; at least it was hoped that there would be a
full house, and the dispatchers of invitations completed their labors and sat
back in the assurance of a good job well done. One invitation is known to have
been addressed to a certain noble Duke in Belgravia in ignorance of the fact
that the said "Duke of—" was actually the name of a local hostelry.
It is not known whether the licensee accepted the invitation for himself and
came along to hobnob with the nobility and gentry, but it is true that for some
time afterwards some of the more facetious among the brethren had the habit of
asking one or another of the responsible elders if they had heard from the Duke
of—lately!) A major difficulty presented itself. The twelve hundred seats in
the Tabernacle were already normally fully occupied on Sunday evenings. Where
would the expected visitors sit? Jesse had the answer to that one. At the
evening meeting on the previous Sunday he entered the pulpit and described the
entire plan to the assembled brethren. Then, leaning forward, "but,
brethren, this is not for the likes of you!". The congregation were not
sure whether to smile or look disappointed at this rather unusual mode of
address. Waving his hand up and down—a characteristic habit of his—he went on
to tell the rather astonished assembly that their absence was to be preferred
to their presence on this occasion and he expected them to leave the Tabernacle
vicinity after the afternoon meeting and disperse to their homes, so leaving the
locality clear for the expected distinguished visitors.
And it was even
so—except for a small party of the younger brethren who determined that they
were not going to miss anything, and so assembled in an inconspicuous corner on
the other side of the road to observe what went on. Sure enough, at the
appointed time the carriages-and-pair—occasionally a motor—appeared in Craven
Terrace and drew up in-front of the Tabernacle. Footmen leaped out and opened
the doors to allow his Lordship and her Ladyship to alight. Some of them looked
about a little uncertainly as if wondering to what kind of place they had come.
Waiting at the tope of the steps, resplendent in new frock coats specially
bought for the occasion, were the two Tabernacle doorkeepers, Fred Pett and
Samuel Martin, (Fred, short and rotund, looking what he was, a suburban grocer,
and Sam Martin, every inch a military sergeant-major type, for which reason the
younger fraternity usually referred to them both rather irreverently as
"Gog and Magog"). So the visitors were duly ushered in and shown to
their seats, and when the uniformed generals and admirals, and a few clerics of
the Church, had all entered and the carriages had gone and the street was
quiet, and it was getting a bit cold, the watchers in their turn went home.
It is not
recalled that there were many converts. One titled lady did throw in her lot
with the Bible Students, and was faithful to the Cause in spirit and with her
means until her death some thirty years later. It is true that the discourse of
Paul at Athens produced as converts Dionysius the Areopagite and "a woman
named Damaris". Perhaps lour titled sister of these times was a modern
Damaris. Perhaps it was for her sake that the Lord allowed the whole thing to
go head.
But the experiment
was never repeated.
And now
had come the time for the most extensive and effective witness to Present Truth
ever given in this country—the public showing in London and throughout the
United Kindgom in 1914—15 of the audio-visual presentation of the Divine Plan
entitled the "Photo-Drama of Creation"..........
4
PHOTO-DRAMA OF CREATION
THE MOST
ambitious-and the most effective—means of propaganda ever devised by the Bible
Students was the public presentation of what was termed "The Photo-Drama of
Creation."
The Photo-Drama
was an assemblage of moving pictures and optical lantern slides accompanied by
a spoken commentary on gramophone records, illustrative of the history of the world
from its beginning in the distant recesses of geological time, through human
history and onward to the end of the Millennium and the consummation of the
Divine Plan for man. Interspersed with the sequence of "talking
slides" were short runs of silent films in color depicting Bible incidents
from the time of Abraham to scenes from the life of Christ and the Apostles.
The entire presentation occupied eight hours continuous display; this was
divided into four presentations of two hours each, usually at weekly intervals
at any one venue.
Two factors
rendered the Photo-Drama of absorbing public interest. One was the fact of the
films being in color, at a time when even black and white films were relatively
new and color photography had not been invented. The art of imposing successive
pictures on a motion film had been invented by Edison only so recently as 1892
and it was early in the present century before public "cinematograph
theaters" began to open. These Photo-Drama films were the first color
films ever to be seen and they were regarded at the time as sensational. They
were in fact produced by hand coloring, frame by frame, a colossal task
involving the treatment of nearly a quarter-million pictures each measuring
only one and a quarter inches by one inch-the work must have been done under
magnifying glasses. The second factor was the employment of "talking"
colored slides. These were the orthodox three inch square plate glass optical
lantern slides of the times, specially made for the purpose; others were
photographed from existing scientific data as for instance the series depicting
the evolution of the earth from its original form-less state through geologic
ages to the appearance of man.
Special slides
were made describing the early events of Genesis such as the story of the
Garden of Eden, the Flood, the Tower of Babel, and so on. Use was made in some
cases of the availability of existing commercially available slides of later
Bible stories but these had to be heavily supplemented by ones specially made
to meet the requirements of the series, including the final parts containing
the expected events of the end of the Age and onward into the glories of the
Millennium. There were just under fifteen hundred of these slides altogether.
Each of the four presentations required twenty-four gramophone speech
recordings descriptive of and synchronized with the associated groups of
slides. At appropriate intervals there appeared a short film which covered a
particular Bible story or theme for about twenty minutes accompanied by
particular musical pieces on the gramophone (musical accompaniments to silent
films were normal in those days and talking films had not been invented.) The
"mechanics" of the operation were quite complicated. There had to be an
optical lantern with its operator for the slides, focused on the screen.
Secondly, a cine-projector for the films, with its own operator, similarly
focused. Down below, at the foot of the screen, two gramophones, each having
its own operator, working alternatively to insure continuous speech consistent
with the removing and replacement of records (which at that time could only run
for a few minutes each.) This, incidentally, did not always work as planned. At
the commencement of each showing there was a short film of the Pastor himself,
with a few words from the gramophone, descriptive of the aims and object of the
enterprise, and with a gracious gesture of farewell leaving the studio and
passing out of sight. On at least one occasion, and according to reports, on several
others, a short hiatus in the gramophone reproduction due to some slight
operating fault caused the Pastor to bid farewell and leave the studio whilst
his speech continued for a minute or so thereafter, which tended to spoil the
desired effect.
The novelty to
this, the first talking film ever seen on either side of the Atlantic,
outweighed this small demerit, and the audiences were suitably impressed. But
what with operators and ushers there had to be quite a team with each set of
the Photo-Drama equipment, and there were in the UK sufficient sets for five
simultaneous showings in different towns. Twenty British brethren gave up their
normal occupations to travel from town to town with the equipment to set up,
operate, and dismantle it. These twenty were trained in its use by American
brethren who came over for the purpose. In succession to this, brethren from
Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, and France spent a
while in England to be similarly trained by their English counterparts in
anticipation of the later exhibition of the Photo-Drama in those countries.
This project
was hailed by the Press and public as the most ambitious pictorial presentation
of the Bible story ever attempted. Part 1 commenced with an account of the development
of the earth from chaos, the "six days of Creation," the Flood, and
on to the time of Abraham. Part 2 continued the story to the time of Moses and
the Exodus, thence to the Israelite monarchy, David and Solomon, and to the
Babylonian Captivity. Part 3 dealt with the coming of Christ at his First
Advent, the events of his life, his death, and resurrection. Part 4 concluded
the story by depicting history from Pentecost and the Early Church throughout
the last two thousand years, to the present, with foreviews of the expected
disordered state of the world during this present century, which have proved
startlingly accurate in the light of current events, merging finally into a
series of representations of scenes in the Millennium which have yet to be vindicated
by reality in coming days. The one criticism which could now be leveled at
these final pictures is that representations of human skill such as buildings,
cars, airplanes, and the like, taken from the finest examples of such known in
1913 and put forth as the acme of man’s inventive genius, to be characteristic
of the Millennium, would now, seventy years later, be considered decidedly out
of date. But the principle remained and at one time these pictures of
postulated Millennial conditions drew audible expressions of admiration or
wonder from the audiences.
An ambitious
publicity campaign was mounted, carried our by hundreds of active brethren.
Descriptive literature was distributed door to door in the first place giving
dates and times of imminent local presentations. Nearly thirty million of those
leaf-lets were distributed and since the population of the United Kingdom was
only a little over forty millions at the time it fol-lows that virtually every
adult in the country must have seen one.
Advertisements
in newspapers and popular journals, placards on advertising boardings,
showcards in shop window, every conceivable means of making the project
publicly known was brought into play, and this without doubt contributed in
major degree to the enormous public interest. Each person who attended was
given, upon leaving, a memento "scenario," a twenty-four page folder
which reproduced all the spoken dialog of the particular presentation and a
selection of thirty or so of the pictures appertaining thereto. Later on the
complete four parts of this scenario were published in bound volume form; in
addition colored postcards of many of the pictures were made available and by
these means memories of the Photo-Drama was kept alive for many years
afterwards.
The net outcome
of the enterprise, which continued in this country from June 1914 to late 1915,
was that close to two million people attended the exhibitions and about one in
thirty followed up their interest with enquiries which kept the local classes
busy for a long time afterwards.
The first
public exhibition of the Photo-Drama was staged in London on Sunday, June 14,
1914, at the Princes Theater, Shaftesbury Avenue, London. The building was
packed and the audience was rewarded by Pastor Russell on the stage personally
to introduce the Photo-Drama to this country. On Sunday, June 21, in commenced
to be shown in Glasgow at St. Andrews Hall.
There then
ensued a run of five weeks at the London Opera House, where continuous morning
and evening showings resulted in packed houses with hundreds turned away. From
then until the end of the year a hundred cities and towns in Great Britain and
Ireland were visited by the Photo-Drama, the five teams with their equipment
working "flat out," as the saying goes. The original expectation had
been that by the end of that year the effort would achieved its object and be
coming to its close, but the public clamor increased rather than decreased. A
re-appraisal of the subject resulted in Henry Shearn of the London headquarters
being appointed "superintendent of Photo-Drama" to exploit and fill
the needs of this constantly expanding interest.
The immediate
outcome of this was the organization of another London exhibition involving
seven days at the Royal Albert Hall and another seven days at the London Opera
House. Both, as before, experienced full houses; forty-two thousand Londoners
attended. Following this the Photo-Drama went on to another tour in the
provinces and was shown in another two hundred towns with a total attendance of
six hundred thousand. With two exhibitions a day in London this implies an
average of 1500 at each showing in London and between 300 and 1500 in the
provinces varying according to size of town.
The cost must
have been considerable. The films were professionally made by one of the then
major companies to scripts furnished by Brother Russell so that the Biblical
presentations were as accurate as Bible Students could make them-unlike,
regrettably, many modern film versions of Bible stories-(per-haps one minor
slip occurred in the choice for headgear for the patriarch Abraham, which was
immediately dubbed and known for years afterwards as "Abraham’s
tea-cozy.") This involved professional actors, actresses, and film sets,
many of which had to be out-door scenes. And the hand coloring of the resultant
films added appreciably to the cost.
So this quite
remarkable evangelistic effort came to an end so far as the UK was concerned.
The country had now been more than a year at war and conditions were getting
difficult. The Zeppelin raids over London deterred the people from going out at
night and their assembling in large halls was beginning to be officially
discouraged. But all in all, it was a remarkable achievement, not least in the
light of the sheer human endeavor exerted by the many who labored incessantly
in all kinds of ways to make the project a success.
Thirty
years afterward there was an attempt to revive it in this country, using copies
made from some of the old films and slides which had survived. But the old
magic had gone; the pictures which were considered so wonderful in 1914 and now
been superseded by modern invention. Color photography and sound films had been
developed; it was not possible to reach the new generation as it had been with
their forebears. The Photo-Drama was an essential and very potent factor in the
work of what Bible Students called the Harvest of the Age. It played a great
part in the reaping of that Harvest, but after the inexorable march of events
into the first post-war period in which nothing was the same, not ever would be
again. The nature of the "Harvest message" as it was frequently
called, was to change, and change...drastically. But the Photo-Drama of
Creation was never forgotten.
5 END OF AN
ERA
ON OCTOBER 31,
1916, Pastor Russell died.
Suddenly.
The
announcement sent a shock wave throughout the Bible Students’ community around
the world. Somehow no one had ever visualized the possibility of the movement
without its leader. That he should have been removed suddenly and without
warning was unthinkable. And he was only sixty-four! The Harvest witness was in
full swing and he had been universally looked upon as the inspiring force and
leader of that witness.
Now he had
gone! The question uppermost in every mind was, "What now?"
Of course
re-organization started. The Pastor’s instructions were clear and unequivocal.
In the event of his demise the affairs of the Society were to be managed by a
Board of Directors the members of which he named, and since the Society was in
fact solely a printing and publishing organization having no powers of control
over the individual Bible Student churches it should be that church life should
not be affected apart from the loss of the inspiring example of the leader.
There was therefore little or no expectation in the UK at this moment that the
unlooked-for event would appreciably affect the conduct of affairs on this side
the Atlantic apart from the emotional effect of the loss. Unexpected though it
was, some among them will have remembered that when in this country in 1913,
three years earlier, the Pastor suffered a serious heart attack, and while
under the care of two London specialists his heart stopped beating for five
seconds.
They did not
expect him to survive. Their verdict at the time was that his was a most
remarkable case, a physical frame almost worn out but a mind as fresh and
virile as ever.
It is possible
he had some premonition of his approaching end.
He had not been
in good health for several years. Nearly forty years of incessant travel in
every part of the world with continuous preaching, the editing of a fortnightly
magazine, the management of a large and continually crowing evangelical
organization, had taken its toll. And there was another factor.
Pastor Russell
was well versed in the history, the triumphs and the failures, of past
Christian organizations and movements. He knew, only too well, what so often
happened when the reformer who started and built up a movement passed on. All
too often other men, lesser men, sometimes, alas, ambitious men, battled to
gain control and bend the organization to their own ends or shape it in
conformity with their own ideas. The principle characteristics of the movement
get lost in the process.. Some of his co-workers who knew him intimately
claimed after his death that he had begun to feel that he was losing control of
that which he had built up during his forty years’ ministry. While he lived,
personal loyalty to him insured that these elements would remain below the
surface, but after that . . . ?
There is not
much doubt that the Pastor knew what was coming, and sought to warn the
brethren against it, if perchance they might take heed, and avoid it. He could
not have know when editing the November 1st 1916 issue of the "Watch
Tower," that his own words therein contained were prophetic of a situation
soon to be created among the brethren. Entitled "The Hour of
Temptation," it was a long message of pastoral counsel, of which just a
few extracts here given, to show how clearly he perceived the tendency of
which, perhaps, he was about the only one fully conscious at the time.
"The
selection of improper leaders is a reflection against the Church which has the
improper leaders. How could such get into positions to represent the Lord’s
people, except by the latter’s votes? When will the Lord’s people learn that
ability to talk in public is only one of the qualifications of an Elder? Time
and again have we noted how the Lord’s Cause has been hindered, and spirituality
among the brethren has been stifled, by attempts to imitate the established
churches in putting forward people glib of tongue, lacking in spirituality.
"In such a
case, is it not pride on the part of the Church, a desire to make a fair show
in the flesh before the world? If not, why do they elect such persons? . . .
When Elders seek to bring the Church under their control and succeed, does it
not show that the Church lacks the very quality the Lord desires to see,
—courage, overcoming? And does the Church not injure such a would-be ruler, as
well as itself, by permitting him to succeed in such unscriptural methods? . .
.
"We have
already alluded to the ambitious and selfish spirit in the world, leading on to
anarchy; and we have just pointed out how the same selfish, ambitious spirit is
leading on to anarchy in the Church. The world cannot purge itself, for the
leaders and the led have the worldly spirit. But not so is the Church of
Christ.
Ours is the spirit
of the Master, the spirit of loyalty to Truth, the spirit of the Golden Rule,
the spirit of brotherly love, the spirit of liberty and helpfulness, the spirit
of fidelity to what we believe to be the Truth. It is inexcusable for the
Church, possessed of this spirit, to continue under the domination of ambitious
men. If they have not been conducting their Church affairs along proper lines,
should they not begin at once? We believe that this is the time in which to set
the House of the Lord in order . . .
"But,
someone will say, ‘we would have a great disturbance if we attempted to do
anything contrary to the wishes of those who have fastened themselves upon us
as our leaders and rulers. To make a move at all would endanger a division in
the Church, and how could we think of anything which would result in that
catastrophe?’ "But, we enquire, which would be the better, to have a
smaller Church operating along the lines which the Lord has indicated, or a
larger Church upholding principles contrary to the Lord’s provision, injuring
themselves, hindering their influence, and encouraging as a leader one who is
either a ‘wolf’ or else a ‘sheep’ which has been mistakenly led into the wold
spirit? We encourage all the dear brethren who are in such trouble to be very
heroic, to see that they do noting from strife or vain glory, but everything in
the spirit of meekness and love, that they may get back to the liberty
wherewith Christ makes free, and do not get entangled again in any human
bondage."
Little did those
who read those words in that month of November 1916 dream that within a few
more months they would be involved in a controversy that would be precipitated
by men who, whether sincere in their motives or not, were to challenge the
whole basis of self-government on which the Bible Students’ was founded, and
measurably to succeed. The new President of the Society, Joseph Rutherford,
elected in the belief that he would faithfully continue in the path of Pastor
Russell, almost immediately embarked upon a policy of dictatorial rule the very
antithesis of that of the Pastor, and at once evoked strong protest by the
brethren of the USA who were naturally the first to become involved. When by
1918 the confusion in the United States had begun to subside, there was a clear
line of demarcation between the one body which maintained the principles
promulgated by Pastor Russell and the other body which willingly accepted the
oversight of Rutherford and followed him into the conversion of the Society
from the literature service organization that it had become into a rather
dogmatic religious sect in which all members were expected to be obedient to
the mandates of the leader, a system which eventually possessed little or
nothing in common with either the theology, the spirit or the outlook of
thought from which it sprang.
Inevitably the
British brethren were caught up in this maelstrom of conflicting claims, but to
fully understand the position so far as the United Kingdom was concerned it is
necessary to back a little in history, to a point in time prior to Brother
Russell’s death.
The London
Tabernacle had been acquired by Brother Russell in 1911 as a center for the
British work. The building was a first owned by the Society and a lease had
been taken on the adjacent mansion, 34 Craven Terrace, for the Society’s office
and stock-rooms.
The eight
existing London churches which had combined to constitute the congregation of
the Tabernacle enabled the project to make an impressive start-or so they
thought at the time, forgetting for the moment that when Christians attempt to
present an impressive appearance before the world there is usually trouble
ahead. The three co-managers of the Society’s work at 34 Craven Terrace, Jesse
Hemery, Henry Shearn, and William Crawford, were all elders of the congregation
and Hemery was by common consent and election Assistant Pastor and Chairman of
the Board of Elders. All of this caused the Tabernacle to be looked upon as
peculiarly representative of the Society even though in theory and fact it was
an independent and self-governing Church of Bible Students as were all the
others.
The fact that
London was the national capital and this fusion of eight London churches had
produced the largest church numerically in the United Kingdom-a few years later
it was the largest in the world-accentuated the situation, and the respect for
the London Church on the part of the country generally had an effect upon the
events of 1916 onward.
The key to
those events is the fact that between 1913 and 1916 there was a growing
tendency among a certain element on the Board of Elders to limit the freedom of
congregational control of church affairs. To an increasing degree the preaching
services were being monopolized by Jesse Hemery to the exclusion of other elders,
under the claim that since the building was the property of the Society and
that Pastor Russell was the unanimously elected Pastor of the congregation, his
appointed representative, Jesse Hemery, , also unanimously elected Assistant
Pastor, should at least be the principal one to represent him in the pulpit. At
first the position was tacitly accepted. There was, and is to those who knew
him and still survive, no doubt that he was a superb orator and could hold an
audience spellbound for as long as he wished-easily the foremost Bible preacher
in the country. The Pastor himself when establishing the Tabernacle had
stipulated that only really qualified preachers should occupy the pulpit; this
stemmed from his desire than the message should be ably and well presented in
this, the central church of the British Bible Students, and this fact was a
powerful argument in favor of this growing tendency. Unfortunately Jesse Hemery
himself was fully aware that he was the best speaker in the country and this
was no so good. He could have been, and probably was, perfectly sincere in
concluding that it was in the best interests of the Truth that he exert as much
personal control as he could, in his role as UK representative of Brother
Russell, rather than risk the congregation and its elders falling short of the
high standard which had been set. Unfortunately, conscious-ness of one’s own
ability, the plaudits of men, outward success and prominence, is likely to add
ambition to sincerity, and when ambition comes in at the door, sincerity is
liable to fly out the window. Traditionally, the Elders of the Bible Students,
true to New Testament teaching, set themselves to serve the flock, not to lord
it over them. Jesse Hemery as a younger man at the turn of the century was in indefatigable
missionary, never slow to go anywhere in the country to talk to one or two
people who were feeling after the Truth. Now he began to see himself as the
minister of a large London church, like so many churches around him, and that
was a very different thing.
For the first
three or four years all went well. The great days of 1910 were just in the
past. The succeeding evangelical work of the Photo-Drama of Creation occupied
the minds and hands of the brethren throughout 1914 and 1915 and its aftermath
lasted into 1917. Public lectures continued to be well attended and the number
of brethren in fellowship together continued to increase.
Brother Russell
visited England and preached at the Tabernacle as at other places each year
from 1911 to 1914 and it was fully expected that after the war was over he
would be here again. But as the years drew on there was this nagging feeling
that all was not quite as it should be. Why, if the other churches throughout
Great Britain, including the other London Church at Forest Gate almost next
door, were completely under the control of their congregations through their
elders; why, since Pastor Russell’s own recommendations in his chapter on
Church order in the Sixth Volume of Scripture Studies outlined this as a proper
scriptural course; why then was a system growing up in the London Tabernacle
tending toward a different basis? Why were so many of the elders, elected to
serve them in spiritual things, excluded from the performance of the duties for
which they had been elected. Some among them recalled the days before the
fusion in 1913 when as much smaller individual churches they had received and
learned by the ministry of these same elders; now they were all one large and
impressive church things were different and some wanted to know why. They began
to find that big is not always beautiful.
The upshot of
this rising feeling was that in 1915 the Elders initiated a discussion between
themselves aimed at probing the depth of this feeling and what should be done
about it. A correspondence with the Pastor resulted; it is a little uncertain
from such records as still exist whether the London Church or the Pastor made
the first move. A remark made by him at a discourse at a USA convention in 1915
showed that his astute mind was already foreseeing some kind of an imminent
crisis-a "fiery tribulation to separate Elijah and Elisha" he said;
he did not know whether it would first come in "Canada, or the States, or
where." The first record that survives is a letter dated June 20, 1915,
from the Pastor to the London Church, in which he suggested that the London
Church should now assume the responsibility for the running expenses of the
Tabernacle, that "the congregational and the Society’s work should be kept
separate and apart," "leaving the Society the care of the
Bethel" (34 Craven Terrace) "and its expenses." Two months later
at a church meeting the congregation accepted the suggestion and the Pastor was
advised accordingly. In the meantime he had written the three co-managers
suggesting the Jesse Hemery occupy the pulpit on the alternate Sundays and the
other two, with others of the Elders, on the remaining occasions. This was what
the congregation had in mind and it seems probable that more correspondence
ensued, for in a letter to the Church dated October 22 the Pastor said "In
respect to the Tabernacle arrangements being turned over to London, we reply
that if they are ready to take up all of the obligations of the Society
connected with the Tabernacle, including interest payments, we will be very
happy indeed to turn over the entire management of the Tabernacle to the
congregation." A week later at an Elders’ meeting a feeling was expressed
that since the congregation was now bearing the financial responsibility, the
affairs of the Church should be definitely seen to be in the hands of the
Elders and Deacons of the Church, as was the position every where else.
It is here that
a certain amount of "stalling" on the part of Jesse Hemery would seem
to become apparent. He stated that an entire change of policy would be involved
and the proposition would be better considered by the new Board of Elders due
to take office the following February. Since the Board of Elders had survived
relatively unchanged apart from four additional ones since the fusion of 1911
there would seem to have been no reason to expect any change of heart by such
new Board. More-over there was not in fact any change of policy-the Church was
only asking for restoration of rights of control which had been whittled away
during the preceding few years, and which for the four past months the Pastor
had verified should be theirs with his full approval. There is also the
unexplained phenomenon that whereas the Church was under the impression that it
was now paying all the Church expenses the Pastor was still writing letters
asking when the Church was ready to commence the arrangement.
One might be
justified if enquiring if there was not was is nowadays called a "failure
of communication" at this point.
The Church
itself, however, was getting restive. At a Church meeting held on November 28,
1915, the question of the speakers at Sunday services was raised. A motion was
put from the body of the Church "in view of the congregation now paying
the Tabernacle expenses the Church suggests that the services of the Elders be
extended to the filling of Sunday Tabernacle appointments." Jesse Hemery,
as chairman, must perforce put the motion, but before doing so staged a bit of
a rearguard action by telling the assembly "to a limited extent this is
already in operation, and Brother Russell had suggested that Brothers Shearn
and Crawford should serve more frequently in this way."
If this was a
reference to the Pastor’s letter of August 12 it was at best a bare outline. There
was considerable dissent but the calm and admitted winning demeanor of Jesse
gained the failure of the motion, although only by a slender majority. But with
half of the congregation now getting definitely apprehensive of the ingress of
ecclesiasticism into their Church and the loss of the standards of Church
government characteristic of the Bible Student movement since its inception, it
was obvious that matters were not going to remain there. There was clearly the
beginning of a feeling that the fusion of the eight independent London
congregations into one large impressive one with all the opportunities it
offered for personal ambition, had been a mistake, and perhaps they would have
been better off as they were. Most Christian denominations have been through
the same stage of experience in their history, perhaps the Bible Students were
not automatically immune. Some of them most have reflected that they had borne
the heat and burden of the day in the early times between 1882 and 1911 when
their little assemblies had been founded; Jesse Hemery was a comparative
newcomer to London and all the real work had been done before he arrived-he
came into a ready-made Tabernacle and a ready-made congregation. Christians are
human; these earnest souls must have compared the sincere simplicity of their
earlier faith in their little communes, each bound to its neighbors in the
bonds of fraternal fellowship, with this tendency to political moves which they
now saw rising in their midst, and they did not like what they saw.
In the year
1915 the London Tabernacle Board of Elders comprised nineteen men, all of long
standing and mature in the Truth. The history of the period between 1911 and
1915 is barren of church records; most of what is know comes from personal
recollections and information imparted by some who experienced those days but
are now long since gone to be with the Lord. So far as can be gleaned, fifteen
of the nineteen were elders of the constituent Churches before the 1911 fusion.
Of these, four were in favor of the status quo with Hemery; eleven supported
the move for reform. Four Elders joining the Board in 1911 or later, from
outside London, were with then eleven. Thus the proposals in 1915 had fifteen
in favor and four against. Sup-ported as they were by something like 50% of the
Church the result could have been a foregone conclusion had it not been for the
universal conviction that the avoidance of a disruption was the paramount
consideration, and this theme was certainly played to excess by Jesse Hemery,
probably from the best of motives. At this stage he was almost certainly
convinced that the best interests of the Truth in this country required his
personal control over the central Church in London. Perhaps he failed to
consider the Old Testament story of Uzzah and the Ark of the Covenant. So he
though by every conceivable right and proper expedient to hinder the majority
Elders and the Church behind them from taking any positive action.
They took it,
though. The discussions, moves and counter-moves dragged on through 1915
without any decisive result until by December some of the congregation had had
enough. Some of those who had been members of two of the original North London
ecclesias, Crouch End and Stoke Newington, recon-stituted those ecclesias and
in January of 1916 commenced regular meetings. There was no thought at that
time of secession.
These brethren
chose to exercise their constitutional right to organize and control their own
meetings in parallel with the Tabernacle Church, and still remain in fellowship
with them. But it showed which way the wind was blowing. What North London was
doing today West and South London might be doing tomorrow. In fact Surbiton in
Southwest London did follow their example only a few months later. A series of
Elders’ meetings during the next few months strove in vain to persuade Hemery
and those with him to withdraw their objection to normal democratic control of
Church affairs. One might wonder why, with such a majority if Elders in favor.
-at that time fifteen against four-the matter could not be settled there and
then. The answer was determined by two factors-one, the desire of all without
exception that nothing be done to disrupt the prestige of the Tabernacle as the
principal Church of the Bible Students, and two, the personal esteem with which
most of the congregation, which would necessarily have had the last word, held
Jesse Hemery, leading to a reluctance to endorse anything that was not endorsed
by him. Nevertheless it would have to be agreed that something would have to be
done to resolve the dilemma. The correspondence of the previous year with
Brother Russell was brought back into the limelight, and the consequence was
that at an Elders’ meeting on September 1 st 1916 Hubert Thackway moved a
resolution that in view of the fact that feeling in the Church for control of
its own affairs had increased so much in the twelve months just past, the
Elders should go fully and finally into the matter. Unanimous consent being
obtained, a further meeting on September agreed, also unanimously, that a full
statement of what was proposed should be sent to Brother Russell, signed on one
side by the assenting Elders, and on the other by those dissenting.
This seemed
like progress. The Elders dispersed with agreement to meet four days later to
prepare the agreed statement. The hope and expectation was that whatever
Brother Russell advised would be accepted by all parties.
On September 17
Jesse Hemery wrote to Brother Russell charging his two co-managers in the
Society’s office, Henry Shearn and William Crawford, with "disloyalty to
the Pastor" in that they were engineering a movement to put control of the
Tabernacle in charge of a "Church Board." If by this he meant the
Board of Elders he spoke the truth but since this proposal was precisely in
line with Brother Russell’s own recommendations in Volume Six it might be
difficult to say wherein lay the disloyalty.
Despite this
action, Jesse joined in the preparation of the statement and after four
successive revisions it was finally approved and signed by all parties,
including Jesse, on October 21..By this time one of the Elders, Walter
Eddington, wearied of the whole affair, had resigned his office and attached
himself to Stoke Newington. Of the remainder eighteen, two who were in favor of
the proposal, Harold Hooper and Cedric Davey, were apparently not present at
the last, and so their signatures did not appear. Hubert Thackway had, rather
unexpectedly, changed sides, so that in the outcome there were eleven in favor and
five against. (For the record, the "in favor" elders were Cotton,
Cormack, Crawford, Cruikshank, Doe, Edgell, Fraser, Gentle, Hart, Radwell,
Shearn; those "against" were Cronk, Hemery, Seeck, Swain, Thackway.)
The resolution stated that the "in favor" Elders "considered it
to be in the best interests of the Church meeting in the London Tabernacle that
the arrangements governing its affairs be organized along the lines laid down
in Volume Six, which they recognized as the Scriptural method." It went on
to endorse the continuation of Brother Russell as Pastor of the
Tabernacle-which of course implied the Assistant Pastorship of Jesse Hemery-and
the relation of the Tabernacle to the Society, and that the elders should
select the speakers at the preaching services subject to Brother Russell’s
endorsement, as Pastor, of individual names. There was probably a feeling of
quiet satisfaction that at last agreement had been reached. It was
inconceivable that anyone would disagree with the Pastor’s verdict.
Theodore Seeck,
Elder and Church Secretary, posted the letter on October 23. There was no air
mail in those days. Letters went by steamer. It could not have arrived in
Brooklyn before November 1st .
Pastor Russell
had died on October 31.
** * On or about November 13, there set sail
from New York, bound for Liverpool, one Paul Johnson, erstwhiile right-hand man
of Brother Russell, now coming to England as an emissary of Joseph Rutherford,
who at the moment had his hands full in the states endeavoring to effect his
own succession to the Presidency of the Society. In the light of subsequent
events it is tolerably clear that Rutherford’s object in sending him was to
"sound out" the attitude of the British brethren as to his
succession, he was engaged in a difficult task in the States and he was
probably not too sure that he would not meet with the same opposition-perhaps
more so-in Britain. In such case, events proved him to be right.
Johnson landed
in Liverpool on November 19 and proceeded to London, where he confronted the
three London co-managers with the assertion that he had come as "minister
plenipotentiary," whatever that may have meant-nobody ever did find out-to
enquire into the state of the churches and put right anything that was wrong.
As a means of settling the differences of thought on.policy which had
preoccupied the London Church for twelve months this sounded good, and the
brethren prepared themselves to talk and listen. They speedily found out,
however, they were expected to listen and not talk. Johnson claimed that as the
Society’s representative with sweeping powers he would give the orders and the
brethren would obey. His own words, a month later, were "no discussion is
permitted. It is for the UK brethren to carry out the suggestions of the Society’s
representative who has full charge of its affairs in this country." It is
not surprising that the euphoria generated by his coming evaporated rather
quickly-except in the case of Jesse Hemery. And when it was revealed that
Johnson had come fully armed with full knowledge of the proposal which the
London Church had sent to the Pastor for his endorsement, and intended to
suppress it completely, light began to dawn.
It turned out
later-from Johnson’s own writings-but was not known at the time, that he had
come to England having in his possession not only a copy of the proposal signed
by the Elders, but also a copy of the 1916 Elders’ Schedule marked by Jesse
Hemery to show which of the Elders were sponsoring the move toward control of
its own affairs by the Church. And he says that Jesse had sent two copies of
this list to America before he left for Britain. Now if this is true, it does
raise a query. The news of the Pastor’s death could not have reached the London
office before November 2-the Pastor died in California while on a preaching
tour and the news had to be first received at Brooklyn and be cabled from there
to London. If Jesse Hemery sent the schedules to Rutherford immediately upon
hearing of the Pastor’s death, they could not have reached Brooklyn before
November 9, and Johnson left New York no later than November 13. It looks that
there was some urgent discussion at the American end before Johnson left, and
now here he was, having by his own admission already prejudged the issue.
His first
exercise of his claimed authority was to dismiss Henry Shearn and William
Crawford from their positions of co-managers of the Society in Britain, and
order them to remove their furniture and effects from the premises forthwith.
His next was to declare that the resolution intended for Brother Russell’s
approval was invalid and refused-the Tabernacle arrangements were to remain
under the control of Jesse Hemery. This, unwelcome as it was to the majority of
Elders and the Church, was welcome news indeed to Jesse, who now had a powerful
and indeed all-sufficient ally.
He nest
announced that he was off on a tour of the country and it is probably that the
London brethren saw him go with a feeling of relief. They had never before had
a brother from the States quite of this nature and most were not quite sure
what it was all about and what they ought to do about it. The general feeling
that whatever came to them from Brooklyn must be good precluded most from
making any hasty judgment. Anyway he was off to Manchester and that was that
for the time being.
Manchester,
however, thought differently. The national Convention at Manchester was due
over the period December 30 to January 1 and the arrangements had long since been
made and the programs printed and circulated, featuring eighteen British
speakers from the whole country, Scotland to the South. Johnson demanded that
the program be torn up and he himself be given a major share of the speaking
appointments. Under strong protest, the organizers gave way, probably on the
same basis as London.
By January he
was back in London in time for the annual election of Church elders and
deacons. Normally Jesse Hemery as Chairman of the congregation, presided over
this function.
Johnson
insisted that he, as the Society’s representative, preside, quite illegally
since this was an individual Church matter and nothing to do with the Society.
Weakly, Hemery gave way. It is surprising that the congregation as such did not
protest-but the fact is that Johnson was an eloquent and quick-witted man with
a certain winning manner which served to mask in some degree his brusque
authoritarianism. And the congregation, completely unused to this kind of
behavior on the part of one coming from America as a pastor and counselor, were
still in considerable doubt in what way they should react.
Now he returned
to the attack on Shearn and Crawford, demanding from the pulpit that they be
dismissed from their position as Elders, or at least not elected as such at the
election. "Brother Crawford is no longer a child of God" he declaimed
"but I believe Brother Shearn is." In the stunned silence that
followed, one teen-aged observer wondered inwardly why some of the Elders did
not rise and protest at this unwarranted slur on their fellow-elders, but no
one did. As the silence continued, William Crawford rose quietly from his seat,
carefully gathered his books together from the pew shelf in front of him, spoke
decisively and clearly "That’s enough for me,": made his way along
the pew to the side aisle, walked down the aisle and out of the building. For
the first time it became evident that something was seriously wrong.
That something
was plainly demonstrated when Johnson an-nounced that he was called of God to
perform a work in London which, he said, was typified by the work of Nehemiah
and the enemies of the Jews at the Restoration, that in a symbolic sense he was
to judge and slay those enemies who, said he, were those in London who
supported the resolution proposing freedom of action for the congregation.
Outlining this thesis one day to a group of London brethren he was approached
by Duncan Cronk, one of the Elders, who could always be relied on to relieve
the tenseness of a difficult situation with a little light humor. "So you
are Nehemiah, Brother Johnson?" "That is so." And Brother Shearn
is Tobiah and Brother Crawford is Sanballat and you are going to hang them in
the Tabernacle?" "That is so." "Then who am I?"
"The Lord has not shown me yet, Brother Cronk, but he will."
"And Nehemiah is said to have plucked out the hair of his enemies."
"That is so." "Then pluck mine out," and so saying he bent
his head forward revealing a pate so neatly trimmed that even Nehemiah would
have found difficulty in performing his recorded action. For perhaps the first
time since his arrival the other was for a moment at a loss for words.
It is fairly
evident that Jesse Hemery was banking on Shearn and Crawford, the principal
advocates of the freedom proposal, being eliminated by Johnson so that upon the
latter’s return to the States Jesse would be left in supreme control. By late
February, however, Johnson announced that he, and not Rutherford, was the true
successor to Pastor Russell and that he himself was to fulfil the role of the
"Steward" in the Parable of the Penny. To the unbiased mind at the
time the root of the trouble was obvious. Here were three men, Rutherford,
Johnson and Hemery, each convinced that he, and he alone, was the best man to
rule and direct the brethren, ambitious enough to attempt achievement of the
coveted position, and blind to the harm they were causing. There is an old
proverb, the origin of which the writer has long since forgotten, which runs
"When Greek meets Greek, then comes the tug of war." In this case
there were three Greeks, and the tug of war was a triangular one. There could
be only one winner, and in the upshot that winner had to be the one with the
strongest pull.
In the meantime
Johnson was traveling the country visiting the larger churches assuring them
that he was the rightful head of the Society and they should do well to heed
and obey him. In most places he got short shrift; a few did take some notice
and when in later years he formed a body called the Laymen’s Home Missionary
Movement these did associate themselves as a "British branch." At the
time, however, the overwhelming majority wanted nothing more than to see the
back of him. From Liver-pool he wrote Jesse Hemery a long letter in which he
predicted the coming of a long famine, fulfilling an episode in the life of
Elisha, (although what connection there was between an eighth century BC Hebrew
prophet and a possible English famine in the twentieth century AD did no
immediately appear) and instructing that supplies of food be purchased and
stored, especially including "wheat and monkey nuts!" It was now that
the truth began to be glimpsed; the man was undergoing a severe mental
break-down.
"Am not al
all well," he said, "my brain is quite weary . . .
I am sure that
the Lord has given me Sister A" (a Bethel sister accompanying him for
secretarial purposes) "to give me much needed relief. If this relief had
not been forthcoming I am satisfied I would have had a repetition of my 1910
breakdown, but the Lord will sustain me to finish the work he has given me to
do." He had suffered a breakdown in 1910 but it had been thought then that
would be non-recurring. This, and the many eccentricities which he manifested
at them time, and which lingered a long time in the memories of brethren who
witnessed them, and his dictatorial manner and extravagant claims so
uncharacteristic of brethren in the Truth, led to the British brethren chiefly
concerned, and Rutherford in America, reaching the same conclusion
simultaneously, and in consequence Paul John-son received a summons from
Brooklyn to return at once. John-son refused to go and declared once again that
the election of Rutherford as Society President was invalid and that he himself
was Pastor Russell’s true successor. At the time he "dismissed" Jesse
Hemery as manager for the Society; Jesse took no notice of that but realizing,
rather late it must be admitted, the seriousness of the situation, called in
Shearn and Crawford, whom he had quite happily seen disfellowshipped and sent
into the wilderness only a few weeks previously, to come back and help him get
rid of Johnson-which, with perhaps a commendable disregard for old differences,
they did. Looking back from the vantage point of many years later, there could
be a rather grim humor in this rather tardy appeal of Hemery-the denunciations
of Shearn and Crawford by Johnson were as nothing to that of Hemery when many
years later, Johnson said that his "experiences with J. Hemery revealed
him as one of the most cunning hypocrites with whom he ever dealt." (In
these memoirs he always referred to himself in the third person.) "So
completely successful was he as a hypocrite that PSL did not suspect this of
him until after Rutherford thew PSL down . . ." This kind of language was,
of course, totally unacceptable to right-thinking British brethren, however
exasperating the circumstances.
Perhaps, after
all, he was the instrument of the Lord’s salvation as far as the UK brethren
were concerned, for it was chiefly in consequence of the issues he stirred up
in his short sojourn in this country that the attitude of at least half of them
hardened into a resolve that they would neither accept from America nor set up
for themselves any leader wielding dictatorial authority; from thenceforth the
British Bible Students would stand by the principles laid down by their
deceased Pastor and remain a decentralized body having no cohesive bond between
the churches save that of voluntary association together in the practice and
promulgation of a common faith and a common hope.
But despite the
tragedy of the occurrence, and the succession of incidents, saddening at one
time and humorous at another, a dis-passionate of the view of the happening
against the background of the position in England prior to and at the time of
his arrival might enable a more realistic appraisal of his actions to be made.
In the first
place, Paul Johnson could very reasonably have expected to succeed Brother
Russell as leader of the world movement. It is likely that many of the USA
brethren did so expect, and he would certainly have been a more popular choice
than the austere and dictatorial Rutherford. He came to England knowing that
Rutherford, largely be means of legal rather than.moral considerations was
going to win the race, and knowing Rutherford, as he undoubtedly did, as well
as anyone in the States, he knew what would as assuredly happen to the
move-ment to which he had given his life. And he could not bear the knowledge.
Did he think, knowing the sturdy and independent spirit of the British
brethren, that if he could get them on his side he could challenge Rutherford
from this side of the Atlantic and perhaps win? The line between waiting for
the Lord to put things right and trying to put them right for the Lord can on
occasion be a very thin one and many a sincere disciple in past history has
overstepped that line. Then upon arrival in England, instead of meeting a solid
body of brethren ready to do battle for the right under his leadership, as he
might perhaps have hoped, he found a community asserting a right to
independence which would brook no leaders of the kind he envisaged. Hence he
got rid of Shearn and Crawford, the spearheads of the independence movement,
only to find that Hemery had ambitions like to his own, so that he now had an
opponent in England as well as in America. It is a possibility that, faced with
this mounting opposition, and feeling quite sincerely that, if he failed, the
whole Bible Student movement would pass into alien hands and fall into ruin, his
mind became temporarily disordered and this could account for the strange and
unexpected things he said and did. He was normal enough after his return to the
States. He went on to break with Rutherford and eventually organize his own
movement which still survives and conducts a vigorous evangelical work not only
in English-speaking countries but in the third world. The few in Britain who
espoused his cause at the time are represented to this day as a branch of the
American movement still holding to the theological outlook of Pastor Russell
and counting themselves as lineal descendants of his work, but looking to
Johnson and his successors as their spiritual leaders and accepting their
oversight and control. A closer study of his recorded acts and dealings in this
country by anyone who was there at the time suggests a picture of a man
convinced that the fate of an entire world community rested on his shoulders,
frustrated by opposition to what he sincerely believed to be the only way in
which it could be saved, and finally broken in despair at his failure to
achieve his aim. Perhaps his real mistake was the very common one of feeling
that the well-being of the Lord’s work rested on him and him alone. When
tempted to adopt that attitude-and many form the best of motives have been thus
tempted-it is well to remember the words of good king Jehoshaphat: "Ye
shall not need to fight in this battle, for the battle is not yours, but God’s.
Stand still, and see the salvation of the Lord."
** * A
week before the end of March Paul Johnson left 34 Craven Terrace, early in the
morning, quietly, before anyone else was up. The rather undignified-and
unnecessary-mode of his departure, often recounted in other years and
invariably invoking some hilarity, need not be recounted here. He went, and
there was relief at his going. No one knew where he was until news was received
from Liverpool that he had sailed for the United States on March 31. He had
been in this country for nineteen weeks and in that short time created an unprecedented
scene of confusion and misunderstanding amongst the brethren which was by no
means allayed by his departure. A number of churches, mostly from the larger
cities, such as Glasgow and Manchester, wrote to Brooklyn requesting that he be
not allowed to come to Britain again.
6 PARTING OF
THE WAY
BY THE year
1917 the die was cast. There was no settling down after the departure of
Johnson. The primary issue which had subsisted until 1915 was still unresolved.
The country as a whole was looking to London for a lead and London was not sure
which way to go. The Jesse Hemery view of ministerial control by an appointed
minister assisted by a few leading elders on the one hand; an increasing call
for the Pastor’s principle of democratic congregational electoral government
espoused by Henry Shearn, William Crawford and others on the other; in the
middle that section of the London Church uncertain for the moment which was
right. And the rest of the country, insofar as they were cognizant of the
position, waited for the outcome.
The tragedy of
the matter is that, in a way, both sides were right.
Democratic
control by the multitude looks fine on paper and sounds logical when advocated
from the rostrum, —and it appeals to an individual pride and self-esteem.
Unfortunately men-even high-souled Christian men-are notoriously imperfect and
oft-times lacking in that balanced and dispassionate judgment which alone can
guarantee a successful democracy. In a good many spheres wise direction and
authoritarian teaching from an accepted leader is the most effective course for
an orderly community and progress in knowledge. In the Christian world many
prefer to have their thinking done for them by the leader or minister and
accept what he says without further question.
But the usual
result is that they become hide-bound in their beliefs and activities and do
not perceive the advancing light on Divine truth or the relation of those
things to the changing and developing world around them. Thus they can
unwittingly become prey of an unscrupulous and ambitious leader who aspires to
gratify his own impulses to the detriment of those he leads. So they draw back
from the high-sounding appeal of the democrat and point to the dangers inherent
in a leaderless community where, eventually at least, the high ideals are
submerged and, like Israel in the time of the judges, "every man did that
which was right in his own eyes." The very freedom of thought, of
interpretation and understanding of the Scriptures which they require as a
right can-and all too often does-lead to divergences in thought, in
interpretation, in understanding, in co-operative service, and so at the end to
fragmentation of the fellowship.
And which was
the best way to go many at this time frankly did not know.
One man who did
know was Henry Shearn. He saw, perhaps more clearly than any of the other
principal participants in the controversy, the true nature of the threat to the
future of the movement. It was not just a London matter, in concerned the
entire UK community. It was not just a question of London control of its own
affairs; it was whether the entire UK community was to continue in the freedom
it had enjoyed since its inception, or pass under the direction of an autocrat.
But because the Lon-don Church was the most influential in the country and
peculiar-ly associated with Brother Russell as Pastor, it became true that what
London thought and did today, Glasgow would do tomorrow and the rest of the
country during the following week.
Someone had to
give a lead; Henry Shearn was the only man who could do it. A lesser man would
have raised the standard of revolt and gone through the country leading an
insurrection and forming a new movement. The mood was there and it was growing.
But this man, who had given his life and his means to the forwarding of the
Bible Students and in earlier years had gone the length and breadth of the
country counseling and strengthening the local churches and taking the message
door to door to those who as yet knew it not, was not going to admit defeat
until he had exhausted all efforts to hold the country together on a mutually
acceptable basis. He, with William Craw-ford, had been dismissed, or compelled
to resign, as joint managers of the London office of the Society on account of
their joint opposition to Jesse Hemery’s endeavors to assert control, and at
this time were finding it necessary to settle into normal business life again.
In the meantime they became associated with the various re-organized Churches
in the Metropolis, and in Forest Gate, East London, which by now had severed
its connection with the Society and Rutherford its President, and publicly
announce its independence. By now also six of the London elders originally
espousing what was now being called the "freedom movement" had
resigned or failed of election, and mostly linked their destinies with the
seceding London churches; this began a process of attrition of what
increasingly became known as the "opposition" elders which reached
its climax in 1924 when the last two of such were eliminated.
At a London
Tabernacle meeting held on January 21, 1917, a motion was put to the effect
that the new President of the Society, Joseph Rutherford, be appointed Pastor
of the London Tabernacle in succession to Pastor Russell. There was not much
enthusiasm for this-he was hardly known in this country and what was known from
what knowledge had filtered through from USA concerning the events surrounding
his gaining control had not endeared him to the more thoughtful. A good many
abstained from voting; of those who did, the "ayes" considerably
outnumbered the "nays" and he was declared duly appointed. A few
weeks later, on February 18, he was similarly appointed Chair-man of the
congregation and of the Board of Elders, with Jesse Hemery as vice-chairman.
It has often
been questioned in subsequent years how it was that the London brethren
submitted so tamely to the rule of a man who was quite unknown in this country
and who many felt instinctively was by no means likely to be the spiritual
leader and "father in God" as their deceased Pastor. Those who were
there at the time know the answer to that question. It grew from the
deep-seated and sincere conviction held by all the brethren, whatever their
attitude to the question at issue, that the "work of the Harvest" to
which they were engaged was in truth and in fact a definite move of the Divine
Spirit in this present period of the Age-just as Moody and Spurgeon and others
viewed their lives’ work. The argument ran-and it was frequently expressed in
discussion at the time-"the Lord has so wonderfully blessed the work
initiated by Pastor Russell and in which we are still engaged. Is it
conceivable that he would allow any man to take control who would not maintain
the same high standards that had been raised in the past. He may not appear to
us the desirable man we would expect, but perhaps it is that the Lord know
better." In the climate of the time this was a powerful argument and had
it not been for this feeling on the part of so many the outcome may have been
different. Looking back, one reflects that it was better so, in the long run.
The movement was getting too big and it needed a winnowing.
There is little
doubt that s substantial proportion of the congregation now consisted of people
who looked upon the Tabernacle as their church and Jesse Hemery as their
minister, but were not deeply involved in the characteristic work of the
brethren., Their votes on any matter automatically went the way preferred by
Hemery , and this could have been an important factor in the out-come.
Despite this
now very evident disagreement over the question of Church control, leading to
the re-establishment in their own localities of some of the ecclesias which
originally merged to form the Tabernacle congregation, and the consequent loss
to the Tabernacle of an appreciable portion of its adherents, there was little
if any move on the part of those ecclesias to a definite separation.
The feeling was
that they had achieved their own freedom and were satisfied to remain in
general fellowship with their erstwhile associates. In the endeavor-fruitless
as it proved-to stem further breakaways of this nature and to dissuade the
faithful from supporting such ventures, a motion was put before the
congregation on February 25, 1917, and carried by a majority, on the following
terms, "Resolved, that the only preaching services in the London area
supported by this congregation be those held in the London Tabernacle, always
excepting those specially arranged for in connection with Class Extension and
similar work. Where local needs seem to require a Sunday meeting at a distance
from the Tabernacle, the meeting should take the form of a Berean Class Study,
the appointment of a chairman to be left to the discretion of the Church
Executive Committee."
Here was the
gauntlet thrown down with a vengeance. No meeting in London was to be
considered a Bible Students’ meeting unless authorized and controlled by the
"Executive Committee" of the Tabernacle. Some eyebrows at least were
raised at this.
The term
"Executive" was a new and unknown one, and certainly not authorized
by the Church. There was an "Appointments Committee" comprising five
of the senior elders, whose function was to appoint month by month changes of
chairmen for the fifty or so week-night Bible Study classes in London from the
elders and deacons. It might have been an honest mistake by the frame of the
resolution, the unspoken wish being perhaps the father to the thought; it might
on the contrary have been a "try-on," to see how the brethren would
take it. If so, they did not, even though they passed the resolution. The term
"Executive Committee" disappears from such documents as have survived
and does not re-appear until 1922-but that is another story. The significance
of this resolution, however, lay in the realization that failure to conform to
the increasingly authoritative demands of the Tabernacle was going to involve
disfellowship.
Two relatively minor
incidents of this time illustrate the reality of this tendency. In the course
of an open congregational discussion on Church matters one of the elders,
Duncan Cronk, referred to "our brethren at Forest Gate." Jesse
Hemery, from the rostrum, looked down at him and in an icy tone of voice,
queried "Our brethren at-where, Brother Cronk?" Forest Gate had been
the sister London Church for many years but had now refused to accept the new
Society President, and declared its independence.
Doggedly, and
predictably, Dan Cronk replied, " Our BRETH-REN at Forest Gate."
"I don’t know what you mean" observed Jesse coldly, and changed the
subject. The other incidence was at a memorial Service held on October 28,
1917, in memory of Pastor Russell addressed by John Gentle in the morning on
"Brother Russell’s Teachings," George Swain in the afternoon on
"Brother Russell’s Example," and Jesse Hemery in the evening on
"The Harvest Message and Work." Whereas both Gentle and Swain
presented helpful and encouraging discourses on their subjects-too long to
reproduce here-Hemery, after dealing with his subject in his usual masterly
way, closing with a picture of the present condition of the work, had to
conclude with a personal "dig" at the "reformers." "Brethren,
I say to you" he said "what I say to myself; let us review our
consecration to the Lord, our view of these things, and the Lord will give us
all we need to make our calling and election sure. There’s plenty of work for
the willing, I am glad to tell you that the classes are continuing as usual. A
few classes have broken away from us; they think they are in bondage in the
IBSA. Well, they may have their freedom if they call it thus. Some go very
readily into bondage, as when a woman marries a man. Brethren, we feel we feel
we’ve never had so much liberty before as when we were bond-servants."
The immediate
result of this at the end of 1917 was the loss of two more of the
"reforming" elders, Frank Edgell who went to Stoke Newington and
Robert Cormack, who went back to his native Glasgow where he first found the
faith round about 1885, and now joined up with the independent assembly
recently broken away from the second largest British Church. He fellow-shipped
and labored there for something like another twenty years. Independent meetings
at Kensington, Ealing, and Surbiton had come into existence, having closed down
in 1911 to join the Tabernacle. Cotton, Cruikshank, and Fraser had gone back to
the Crouch End church early in the year. All of these save Kensing-ton remained
in fellowship with the Tabernacle until the final separation of 1919-some till
1924.
The year was
marked by the defection of John Gentle from the "reformers" side to
that of the "establishment." Hubert Thack-way had done the same thing
a year earlier. Their loss was keenly felt on the "reform" side; as
senior elders of long standing their influence counted. By the early months of
1918 there were only five reformers; many of the congregation had given up and
left to join with the dissident meetings but still there was no open break. It
was a case of hoping against hope that a semblance of unity could be
maintained.
But events were
moving in other parts of the country. The new Society President had not yet
presented himself in person to the British brethren-it is tolerably certain
that he was still having difficulty in establishing his position where he
was-and there was still a hope in London that when he did get to the UK he
would be found perhaps more amenable to change than he had been presented. (That
was a forlorn hope but no one really knew that at the time.) The war (World War
I) was nearing its close; all people were heartily sick of it and things were
very quiet. But a general movement toward secession from the Society was now
taking place, following the example of brethren from the major centers, Forest
Gate, London Tabernacle, and Glasgow. Provincial cities, such as Manchester,
Birmingham, Bristol, Nottingham, Darlington, now had their independent
meetings. Altogether something like sixty such centers, large and small, town
or rural, were by now in existence and clamoring for a lead from someone they
knew to point the way to a corporate future in which their local independence
could be assured consistent with the provision by a suitable center of the
printed literature for evangelical work, of speakers for public meetings, and
"pilgrim" counselors to visit them and give pastoral aid to their
continued in the grace and spirit of the Faith-all those helps which had
heretofore been provided by the Society founded for the purpose by their
departed Pastor, and from which they now had to turn sorrowfully away.
And so the
Bible Students Committee of Great Britain came into existence.
By the
beginning of 1919 the demand for action from all parts of the country were
becoming too vociferous to be ignored any longer. There were now more than a
hundred independent "classes," Churches, in the UK. Some were in
localities where the entire existing IBSA community had seceded en bloc from
the Society; most consisted of a proportion, sometimes minority and sometimes
majority, who separated from the existing meeting and reformed themselves in a
new meeting place. Henry Shearn and William Crawford, and others with them
realized that the time had come to act if this demand and desire for a form of
union for concerted action was not to be dissipated. There were still a good
many, not only in London but in may of the provincial cities, who were still
with the original Society meetings hoping that the division could yet be
avoided but steadily losing hope; nevertheless the increasing number who saw no
prospect of this and would wait no longer prompted the step that was now taken.
Following
consultation with a number of brethren throughout the country, a conference was
held at University Hall, London, on April 5, 1919, at which it was decided to
set up a central committee to be known as the Bible Students Committee, to
initiate and conduct those activities requiring joint communal action such as
printing and publishing, providing lecture speakers and pilgrims, etc. This
Committee was to be subject to annual election by the UK brethren generally,
and there would be no titular head or leader. The organization was to be
proceeded with an once, and in four months’ time approved, modified or
terminated by a General Convention to be held in London. Thus the entire
arrangement was in the hands of the brethren generally and so fulfilled the
principles for which the dissident brethren were con-tending.
The brothers
thus elected to serve, seven in number, were William Crawford (London); Frank
Edgell (London); F. G. Guard, Sr. (Forest Gate); Alex Guy (Forest Gate);
William Seagar (Ipswich); Henry Shearn (London), and George Tharatt (Bishops
Stortford), all well known and trusted.
A circular
letter dated May 1919 from the Committee’s temporary address at 42 Selborne
Road, Ilford, London, was widely distributed among the brethren reporting these
arrangements and notifying the coming Convention in London on August 2-4, at
which the whole arrangement would be presented for universal discussion and
ratification. This Convention was duly held at East Ham Town Hall, London.
Six hundred
brethren from all parts of the country, from London-derry and Dublin to Dover
and Ipswich, from Penzance and Barnstable to Glasgow and Sunderland, were
present. Sixty-five local Churches over the entire area had sent delegates
armed with specific instructions and most of the remaining forty or so centers
advised their opinions and wishes, so that the net number having thoughts on
the matter at issue considerably exceeded the six hundred. The net result was a
unanimous decision that the inauguration of the proposed Committee should be
ratified and the system placed on a firm footing. In consequence, and by unanimous
vote, the existing Committee was continued in office for another twelve months,
at which time a national election should be conducted to decide who would serve
for a further term. Henry Shearn was appointed the Committee’s first Secretary.
(In fact he
held that office until his retirement on age grounds in 1935). F. H. Guard, Jr.
was appointed Assistant Secretary.
Having thus
made universally agreed arrangements for what it was hoped would provide for
the undisturbed conduct of the Bible Students’ traditional and normal
activities as they had been in the past, thoughts turned toward the brethren
from whom they were now avowedly separated, and a strong feeling was ex-pressed
by many in the hall that one last attempt be made to bring about a reconciliation
with the Society and effect some form of unity which would still preserve the
individual Churches’ rights of self-government without having to create this
new organization. George Tharatt, stressing that "it is proper to keep the
door for re-union always open" proposed that an approach be made to the
Society voicing the general feeling of the Convention. This developed into a
motion which was proposed and approved by the brethren in the words "if
the pro-posals for reconciliation submitted by the Society are acceptable to
the brethren corresponding with the Society in respect to same, that they
submit these to the Bible Students Committee, and if considered by them
sufficiently satisfactory, the Commit-tee be empowered to call a Convention at
the next Bank Holiday time, so that the whole matter may be considered at a
properly convened business meeting, to decide if the reconciliation proposals
are satisfactory, and whether the Bible Students Committee shall be
disbanded."
The feeling of
the Committee that this "last ditch" attempt to heal the breach
should be made was expressed by the report of the Convention, in the words
"the only object of the Committee is the comforting and supporting of the
many brethren in Great Britain now finding themselves unable to acquiesce in
much that is being said and done in the name of the Lord and the Harvest work.
Seeing that, apart from the extraordinary claims made by the Society of late,
there are no outstanding doctrinal differences, the brethren are hopeful that
the true basis of union, justice, liberty, peace, and love, may be recognized
and unity established."
In the spirit
of this feeling a special "Reconciliation Committee" of eight
trustworthy brethren was elected, entrusted with a man-date "to take all
steps possible to bring about a reconciliation with the Society, in harmony
with the expressed desire of the Convention."
The Convention
closed, the delegates returned home to report to their fellows the progress
that had been made, and all settled down to await the outcome of this last
attempt to resolve the points of issue with the Society. It failed.
Correspondence and interviews went on for many months but always the response
was the same. The wanderers from the fold would be welcomed back, but they must
accept the new concept now being insisted upon by Rutherford, to wit, that the
Watch Tower Society with its President was the only channel of Divine truth and
direction of evangelical activity. All must accept the wish and word of the Leader.
In a statement dated January 26, 1921, furnished to every member of the London
Tabernacle congregation, dealing with this attempt at reconciliation and
blaming the failure of same upon the alleged intractability of the other side,
occurs the words "Evidently, that which the Bible Students Committee
desires is not reconciliation so much as a frank disavowal by the Society of
its office as channel for the Lord." This, of course, was a perfectly true
statement. This claim lay at the root of the matter. Subsequent events over the
next ten years demonstrated the intention of Rutherford to convert the entire
movement into an instrument of his own will and any antagonistic factor must be
rigorously repressed.
By 1921
therefore the secession was an accomplished fact and the brethren taking part
in it settling down to the new order of things. The number of independent
churches associated with the movement was now up to 135, aggregating some three
thousand brethren, just about one half of those associated with the Society
when the differences arose in 1916. The annual London Convention continued
together with another in the Midlands and a start was made with the publication
of literature of the type formerly favored but now with a new publisher’s
imprint. An office and stockroom was opened at 23 Marylebone Road in Central
London; after a short period this was removed to 92 Cambridge Gardens,
Kensington, in West London, where there was a con-gregation of seceded Bible
Students, and here it remained until 1924 when it moved again to more
commodious premises at 204 Broadway Chambers, Letchworth, some distance out of
London.
This became a
well-known center and here it was located until 1935 when with the retirement
of H. J., Shearn it moved to Welling, and in 1956 to Hounslow in the case of
Basile Dumont. Then in 1922 the Judge (Rutherford) paid his long expected visit
to Britain to meet and talk with those of the British brethren who were still
loyal to him-up and down the country only about one half of those who had been
in the movement at the Pastor’s death. He had paid a brief flying visit in 1920
but only to consult with Jesse Hemery as to his plans for the future and-apart
from one London meeting-few of the faithful so much as saw him.
Now he was
coming to announce the new kind of evangelism he intended to introduce. As a
preliminary he was to be introduced to the elders of the London Tabernacle of
which only three were on the dissentiant side, the others having been
eliminated during the preceding years on one ground or another, and replaced by
"new blood" whose loyalty to the Judge was more or less guar-anteed.
And so the
elders were bidden to be present in full ceremonial dress (which consisted of
the traditional English frock coat, an essential for a London elder in those
days; but the Judge soon put a stop to that) and they stood in a wide
horse-shoe in the Bethel dining room at 34 Craven Terrace while Jesse Hemery,
visibly on edge, conducted a kind of military inspection to ensure that every
one was neat and tidy, saying then, "I am now going to fetch the Judge,
brethren" and disappeared through the door at the far end of the room.
Presently he re-appeared, and behind him a massive bulk, featuring a grim
expression of a type not usually associated with the brethren in the Lord.
"These are the elders, Brother Rutherford" announced Jesse with a
slight wave of the hand. A loud and deep grunt was the only response from he of
the grim visage; he looked at Jesse as much as to say, "And I don’t think
much of them." A though flashed straight through the mind of one elder
"this is no successor to Pastor Russell" and later discussion with
his two fellow dissentients revealed they were of the same opinion. An awkward
pause, broken by Jesse volunteering a little information about the organization
of the Church, to which the great man responded by saying that he would be
seeing the elders again, and with a curt nod turned round and walked back the
way he had come. To give him his due, he did rather better when he addressed the
congregation on the following Sunday, and Jesse did explain afterwards to the
elders that the grunt was due to an obscure throat com-plaint; having by then
heard him in full cry on the Sunday, that particular excuse did seem rather
thin.
Mercifully, the
elders were not called upon to meet him again at this visit. A tour round the
principal cities of the UK had been arranged to give him the opportunity of
acquainting the British brethren with his vision of their future work. At many
places a number did not like the vision very much and since almost immediately
the number of classes and churches declaring them-selves to be independent and
coming into association with the Bible Students Committee increased from 135 to
160 there is ground for thinking that, quite unintentionally of course, the
Judge had proved to be a quite good recruiting agent for the secession
movement. Particularly this was the case at Glasgow where he faced the second
largest Church in UK, some 800 strong at the time, augmented by visitors from
other Scottish churches so that s thousand people were gathered to hear him. It
seems that he appeared on the rostrum flanked by a kind of bodyguard of
muscular young men, procured from where nobody knew, and to serve what purpose
nobody knew either.
Someone should
have told him that if he wanted to introduce innovations of this nature
Scotland was the last place in the United Kingdom to do it. And Glasgow had a
long history of association with the Faith and with Brother Russell, and some
of what they were now seeing and hearing was not going down very well. And
someone should have also told him that the Glasgow brethren were more sturdy
and less tractable than the others he had left behind in London. The climax
came when he initiated a kind of election of elders-it transpired that he had
already been told who of the existing elders were likely to favor him and who
oppose. He began to rule down any name he thought fit, and at that really
fragrant usurpation of the Church’s own right and privilege there began to be
audible dissent. Observing this, he shouted brusquely, "Let the lame ducks
get out." He could not have anticipated the reaction. Of the thousand
people present, almost five hundred stood up and streamed out of the building.
The existing small
independent meeting in Glasgow received an accession of membership that day
which put it in the lead of the independent Churches of Britain. It was said at
the time that for the only recorded time in his career the Judge was visibly
shocked at the denouement.
It was at that
time that Duncan Cronk, one of the London elders most ardently supporting
Rutherford, abandoned that stand and joined the dissentients. Dan Cronk was a
man of tender heart, and the general run of brethren loved him for this, and of
caustic tongue and keen insight where pride, ambition, insincerity, and
double-dealing was detected-and he was good at detecting it.
Fiercely loyal
to the Pastor and the Society, he did accept it, there was no doubt about it.
He told Jesse Hemery one day that the time would come when "Ichabod"
("the glory has departed") would be written over the doors of the
London Tabernacle; Jesse was never quite the same to him after that!
No one knows
how many letters of concern and entreaty went to the Society’s offices at
London and Brooklyn-obviously these never saw the light of day after receipt.
One such letter is known, from a sister of long standing in Kent. The
sentiments therein ex-pressed may be taken as typical and expressive of the
feelings of many who, after holding on for a lesser or greater period, at the
last had to join the secession. That letter reads: "In the following
remarks I do not oppose the service work but I do stand for religious liberty
and toleration. In the June 15 Watch Tower in the article on ‘question on
witnessing’ it seems that individual opinion is not allowed. The claim that the
W. T. B. & Tract Society is THE visible organization of the Lord on earth
is to my mind not scriptural. I grant it may be AN organization of the Lord but
to me the Scriptures teach that ‘if ANY man be in Christ he is a New Creation’
and all begotten of God’s Holy Spirit are anointed and commissioned to preach
the Word, irrespective of any organization. We have our ordination of God
alone. The Church is entitled to govern itself, but if all policy whether in
relationship to service work or anything else is to come through the
organization then the Church has no opinion in the matter and therefore to some
extent is in bondage. This we must remember was Papacy’s claim, to be THE
visible representative of God on earth and we are all familiar with the bitter
fight for liberty and freedom in religious thought and action. To me God’s
organization consists of all his anointed people, whether in or out of the
I.B.S.A. An arrangement between a community of the Lord’s people for harmonious
work is a very different thing to the present claims. My allegiance is to the
Lord alone.
He is the Lord,
the Master and the Head, and his true people are one with him wherever they are
to be found. I could not believe that they are all in one earthly community and
that all outside that community are not in his organization. Neither have any
power or authority over another, but "all are brethren."
Many in those
dark days felt like that.
So the drift
away from the Society continued. By 1924 there were 181 local centers in
fellowship together and the Committee was being kept increasingly busy printing
and distributing literature, assisting the local brethren with public meetings with
advertising notices, and, where necessary, speakers for same. A regular service
of "pilgrim" visits was now in operation, in which Henry Shearn,
William Crawford, Frank Edgell, Ebenezer Housdon, and other well-known brethren
were active in touring the country and encouraging the smaller communities in
their activities. Some quite appreciable assistance in this project was
unwittingly afforded in 1923 by the institution, at Jesse Hemery’s
recommendation, of a system where by Tabernacle elders visiting provincial
meetings should render a report stating whether the community visited was
"healthy" or "unhealthy," viz; were they in general
manifesting subservience or opposition to the elders emanating from America. At
an elders’ meeting on October 12, 1923, where strong dissent was expressed to
this rather un-British form of "spying, ," Jesse, sensing the mood,
hastened the assure the elders that this was only a "request" and not
mandatory, and it did not mean that anyone was going to be disfellowshipped;
this was only intended to "alert headquarters to those meetings which
needed assistance in understanding the issues involved and encouraging them to
loyalty." All of which sounded fine and large at the time, but its effect
was rather spoiled half-an-hour later and a little farther down the agenda when
Jesse announced that the Executive (meaning himself, Gentle, Radwell, Thackway,
Seeck, Swain, and Dey) had decided to delete one of the local London meetings
(Plumsted No. 54) "on policy" which of course meant that they had
been judged "unhealthy" within the meaning of the Act. At this
usurpation of powers belonging to the elders sufficient of them sup-ported the
three remaining dissentiants to reverse the Executive’s decision, and for a
short time Plumsted No. 54 was reprieved.
But this marked
the end of delay tactics. If the will of the Executive could be thwarted the
whole system of dictatorial control being built up was threatened. Jesse knew
that-and they knew it too.
The first
essential was to get rid of Duncan Cronk. That would not be easy. He was highly
esteemed and popular among the brethren in general and he was an elder of long
standing back to about 1900 in the old Lewisham (South London) Church which had
closed in 1911 to merge with the Tabernacle. He had been a valuable ally when
he had supported Hemery but now he had changed sides the situation was
different. The annual election of elders was due in January 1924 and he had
been an elders as long as anyone could remember. While the entire Church had
the facility of voting, his re-election was virtually assured. So what?
Came the day of
election and the Church assembled for what was always regarded as a serious and
momentous occasion. The selection of the right men was considered essential to
the well-being of the Church. The procedure was always the same. Names were
nominated and seconded the previous week and everyone had their list. Jesse
Hemery presided and called each name in the words "Brother A—. Those in
favor of Brother A-please raise your hands." The tellers went rapidly
among the pews, counting, then proceeding to the front where the totals were
quickly added up. The result was passed up to Jesse who glanced at it and
announced ""Brother A-has-votes. He is elected" -or "not
elected," as the case might be."
On this
occasion the election proceeded as usual and with the customary formula through
the A-s and B-s and to the C-s. At the turn of the name Cronk, Jesse paused for
a moment, while the congregation waited. He raised his head, "I am going
to ask Brother Gentle to take my place whilst this name is voted on. I cannot
conscientiously preside over he voting for a brother who is so lacking
restraint and consideration for the principles of the Truth and I prefer to
stand aside whilst this vote is being taken."
Amidst a
stunned silence he descended the stairs from the rostrum, John Gentle replaced
him and called for the vote.
Consternation
was evident. One looked at another in bewilder-ment.
No such thing
had ever happened in the Tabernacle before.
What had
Brother Cronk done? What did Brother Hemery know that the brethren at large did
not know? An election was traditon-ally a time when there were no questions and
no discussion. No one spoke for fear that there must be some deep dark secret
which had prompted this unheard-of action. And so the tellers went about their
normal duty. A few who saw through the ploy raised their hands defiantly.
Others who esteemed their know-ledge of the brother in question superior to
anything said from the rostrum, added their votes, but when the result was
announced there was no majority vote. "Brother Cronk-is not elected."
That left two.
Brother Hemery did make a feeble attempt to unseat one of them. Instead of the
usual formula "Brother So-and- so. Those in favor of Brother So-and-so
please raise your hands," he first gave the name "Brother
So-and-so." A long pause; then "those of you think Brother So-and-so
should be an elder will of course raise your hands." The innuendo was not
lost on the congregation. But this time it did not work. Brother So-and- so got
a majority vote.
But, of course,
the bell was now tolling loudly. The two remaining dissidents knew that the
farce was not going to last much longer. It only remained to go down with the
flag flying. And Judge Rutherford was coming to the UK again this year to
complete his re-organization of things. As a foretaste of things to come, at
the second elders meeting of the year, held on February 15, 1924, Jesse Hemery
raised the issue of the tunes to which hymns were sung at Tabernacle services.
He had observed, said he, that many of the tunes were not those in the book
(Hymns of Millennial Dawn) and he wanted to know why. (The new tunes had been
going on for a long time but he hadn’t noticed it before.) It has always been
recognized-among those who had to sing the tunes-that American and British
tastes in hymn tunes differed widely, largely due to the different religious
heritages of the two peoples. In consequence to many observations to this
effect from many members of the congregation, the Praise Committed, whose
responsibility it was, had prepared a new tune book, using many better known
and appreciated tunes more customary in UK places of worship, retaining the
Millennial Dawn tunes in cases where by nature or tradition they were more
appropriate.
In this latter
case they had cut out said tunes from the book formerly used on the Tabernacle
organ, thereby leaving same sadly mutilated. John Radwell, Convener of the
Praise Committee, responded to Jesse Hemery’s question by explaining the
circumstances, observing that there was general support for the changes. This,
of course, was the wrong thing to say; it savored too much of congregational
control at the expense of dictation from the top. Something had to be said at
this point and Jesse said it. "Not only has the Praise Committee take it
upon itself to change the tunes the Society has chosen for the Society’s
official hymn book, but they have also cut up the official Tabernacle hymn book
to make their new one." He seemed more aggrieved at the damage to the
Tabernacle hymn book than that to the Society’s authority in the matter of hymn
tunes. Nevertheless he delivered himself of the following impressive dictum.
"Harmony
with the Society necessitates harmony with the tunes the Society has chosen for
its hymn book." The importance of "hymn book theology," the
effect of the doctrinal content of customary hymns on doctrinal belief, is of
course well known in Christian circles, but that doctrinal orthodoxy is also
contingent upon the tune to which the said hymns are sung was definitely a new
one to the London elders, and their reaction to this, and per-haps that of the
congregation, may have had some bearing on the fact that at the next elders’
meeting May 30, 1924, arising from the minutes of the previous meeting, it was
almost unanimously felt that the apparent preponderance of dirge-like tunes
which the Praise Committee seemed to have selected recently for the services
rather illustrated the force of the arguments previously put forward. It is
possible that Jesse felt that he had unwittingly been "taken for a
ride" over this matter, but if so he could not see what he could do about
it, and so, rather grudgingly, he assented to the insertion of a note to the minutes
giving the Praise Committee leave to vary the hymn tunes if those in the
official book were considered by them to be unsuitable.
This
commendable concession having been made, the elders were informed that they
were about to be received in audience by Brother Rutherford, who was waiting in
the wings, so to speak, to be introduced into the meeting. His intention was to
outline the future work and methods of inculcating Divine truth which he
intended the brethren to pursue. After this, said Jesse, he would invite
questions from anyone present. The Executive, however, had decided that there
was need for only two questions and Brother Seeck had been briefed to ask one
and Brother Middledith the other. The implication was that any other elder who
presumed to make use of the proffered opportunity to ask questions would find
himself in trouble. In former days there had been a feature in the "Watch
Tower" headed "Questions with inspired answers," dealings with
questions on Scripture topics answered by reference to the inspired Word of
God. Duncan Cronk the irrepressible, had he still been on the Board of Elders,
would undoubtedly have interjected a favorite remark of his-"Looks like a
case of inspired questions with answers." Unhappily he was not, and the
questions proceeded.
Theodore Seeck
put the first question. What should be the ideal topic for the Tabernacle
Sunday afternoon study? Came the oracular response, it should, of course, be
from the "Watch Tower," the "Sunday School Lesson," and, adding
for good measure, all the week-night meetings should be devoted to the study
and discussion of the leading article in the current "Watch Tower"
(said leading article, of course being written by himself, although he did not
mention that at the time.) This, of course, was not actually Bible Study, but
the question had been asked and the oracle had spoken.
Henry
Middleditch came up with the second, and here the iron hand in the velvet glove
began to show. How should the election of elders be conducted and on what
principles? Considering that this subject had been well expounded and laid down
by Pastor Russell in Volume 6 twenty years earlier, and had been followed
faithfully by practically every Bible Student Church in the world annually ever
since, one might be forgiven for wondering why such a question should be raised
by the leading Church in the land. The Judge thought a little as though this
was a serious matter-as indeed it was-and gave his verdict. A committee of
three senior elders should prepare a list of all brethren considered by them as
suitable for elders and a similar one for deacons. This should be placed before
the retiring Board of Elders and all names upon which they were unanimous
should be voted in en bloc. Any name on which they were not unanimous would be
nominated and voted on by the Church in the usual way. Any name not on the list
would not be eligible for election.
A few years
earlier a proposal such as this which took all electoral power away from the
Church would have been flatly rejected by the elders and by the Church. It is a
measure of the success achieved by the rosy picture painted by the Judge of the
marvelous work of preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom and bringing many more
into the fold and all realized by merely obeying the mandates of the Judge
without question that the brethren were so easily persuaded.
Against the
rules, and at the price of a stern look of disapproval from Jesse, one of the
dissentient elders did ask a supplementary question. How did this proposal
square with the scriptural method which had been assented to by all Bible
Students for forty years past, and as outlined in Volume 6?
The Judge also
looked daggers. He had spoken, and who should question? He explained tersely
that times changed and practices had to change accordingly. And anyway Volume 6
was written twenty years ago. He indicated that he had been in the meeting long
enough and was duly ushered out by Jesse Hemery. He had at least ensured that
after the next election there would be no dissentient elders.
There were not
many shots left in the locker. The battle was lost anyway. It had been probably
not worth fighting for two or three years past. At the next elders’ meeting
June 20, 1924, the Chair-man-Jesse Hemery-announced that the Executive had
decided that all week-night meetings in the London area were to be held on
Thursdays (traditionally each meeting chose its own convenient meeting night)
and all of them must study the same "Watch Tower" article. This was
unreasoning standardization with a vengeance, a thousand people all over London
being told that they must meet on a given night and must discuss what they are
told to discuss-not the Bible, but the word of man. Unfortunately one of the
two dissentient elders, Walter Mott, was absent from the meeting that night.
The other one spoke up in protest, asking what was happening to the Bible
Student claim that they based all their beliefs and conclusions on the basic
study of the Bible itself; what was happening to the volumes of Scripture
Studies which had been the means of leading so many to this basic study of the
Bible, the inspiration of the entire movement?
Jesse Hemery
replied in a more conciliatory tone that he had employed to the questioner for
a long time past. Perhaps, at this late hour, he had recalled his own early
days in the Truth, way back in 1890, when he was about the same age as his
present questioner. Full of enthusiasm for this new understanding of the
Scriptures he had then received, visiting any who expressed an interest,
expounding to them the message, he did all that was within his power to make it
known, in an atmosphere of perfect freedom and good Christian fellowship. If
so, the vision must have faded and there he was, a mature and perhaps
disillusioned man of sixty, head of a large and well-known church but bound to
obey the dictates of a man more powerful than he. It might have been with a
sense of weariness that he gave his answer, the answer that he knew he had to
give. We must be up-to-date, he said. The brethren can study the volumes at
home if they so desire. And that was all.
But not quite.
The subject of "unhealthy" week-night class meet-ngs came up again
for discussion. An "unhealthy" class was one the members of which
were not proving amenable to the voice which spoke from America. The remedy, if
they could not be persuaded to amend their ways, was to strike them off the
list.
"Unprofitable"
was the technical term coined to express the position.
Several present
spoke rather despairingly of the bad influence Walter Mott was having on the
meeting held in his home in South Norwood. Strangely enough, the same meeting
and the same Walter Mott had been highly esteemed for many years as a good
community of Bible Students but since he had made his objections to current
events known not so much was said about that. Walter Mott was a moderately
wealthy business man and upon coming into the Faith many years previously had
donated large sums to the Society towards its work and given generous gifts to
the Tabernacle itself. He was a cheerful, enthusiastic and utterly sincere man
and a popular elder. But he dissented, and he had to go. And the best way to
accomplish this was to disfellowship his local meeting. Their feelings were not
consulted.
The formal
proposal was made. Walter Mott was not present at this particular meeting. No
one seemed to think that mattered.
Before the vote
was taken, Albert Hudson, the only other remaining dissentient, pointed out the
unfairness of condemning a man in his absence and unheard. His only crime-if
crime it was-that he contended for the congregation’s control of its own
affairs as against dictatorship from above, and up to recently that had been
the position at London Tabernacle. He himself hap-... ened to have been the appointed
chairman of that particular study class for the month just past and he found
them to be an earnest and instructed group of people well worthy of the name of
Bible Students. He opposed the motion.
He sat down,
thinking to himself, "If Mottie is for the chop, I go to the block with
him, and that is the end."
It was. Arthur
Lodge, in measured tones and impeccable English, put the opposite case, and
thus ensured the verdict. South Nor-wood was struck off. The last two
dissentients gave up. The 1925 Board of Elders had no disseantients and no
opposition.
But the
secession movement flourished and increased.
7 Morning
Appeareth
THE INSTITUTION
of the Bible Students Committee in 1919 was followed by a ten-year period of activity
and growth on the part of the secession movement. Progress was necessarily
gradual. It was an old tenet of the Bible Students that no roll of membership
be maintained and only the Society’s London office knew just what local
assemblies existed and where they were.
An appreciable
number of these had seceded, or been organized, at various times without
knowing of the formation of the Committee, and only became associated when the
news filtered through to them at some later date. Conscious of this fact, and
desiring to reach any who were dissatisfied with current events, a postcard was
prepared and circulated by every practicable means to reach such, apprising
them of the position and inviting their response. Headed "In the Master’s
Name" it ran: "It is not surprising that in some quarters there is
surprise and disillusionment. The early joy of the Truth has become dimmed in a
maze of activity and service which in many cases hinders the work of the Holy
Spirit in one’s own heart. Therefore some are perplexed and distressed, and
some are losing faith.
"Others
have passed through this experience before, but the Good Shepherd, true to His
word, has led them beside green pastures and still waters. To-day they rejoice
in fellowship which although small in numbers, and oft-times coming short of
its profession, endeavors to manifest the spirit of Christ. There is no central
organization to whose behests all must conform—the various classes determine
for themselves what they shall study and how their meetings shall be conducted.
There is free literature and ample opportunities for public witness work of all
kinds. Several periodicals minister to the spiritual needs of the brethren, and
pilgrim visits, conventions and other mediums of growth in grace are at the
service of the friends, "without money and without price". As in the
days of old, the Master’s work is carried on in faith that He will supply the
means.
"If you
are disturbed in mind, realizing that your Christian life might be richer and
fuller than it is; if you feel that you cannot exercise to the full that
liberty wherewith Christ makes free; rest assured there are some who are
waiting to extend to you the right hand of fellowship."
The reverse
side of this card bore the address of the Committee for return, with space for
the recipient’s name and address, enabling them to be sent further information
and details of the nearest regular meeting of the brethren. These cards were in
regular use for more than fifteen years thereafter but they had their greatest
impact during the years 1920-1928. Many of the brethren took quantities and
sent them to others of their acquaintance and so an appreciable number were
brought into contact with what was going on.
A number of
assemblies there were which did not fall in with the arrangements thus made,
preferring to maintain a somewhat aloof attitude, at least in the earlier
years. Their members had been so deeply wounded by recent experiences that they
tended to distrust all forms of organization and elected to conduct their
fellowship in measurable isolation. The feeling was understandable, and in most
cases made little difference to their association with the brethren generally,
and their participation in convention gatherings and the like.
Demands began
to come in from all over the country for pastoral visits to the classes by
members of the Committee or other able brethren, to inform, advise and
encourage the local meetings, and for printed matter in the form of leaflets
and books suitable for evangelical work. All the emphasis was on continuing
church life and activity as it had existed before the secession. Funds were
coming in rapidly and it was evident that the growing work was not going to be
hampered by lack of money. Rightly judging that the first essential was to
gauge at first hand the outlook and wishes of brethren everywhere the first
overt action of the Committee was to organize the "Pilgrim Service",
whereby various brothers undertook planned tours covering the meetings and
brethren in a given area to minister pastoral counsel and encouragement on the
one hand, and on the other to acquire knowledge of what it was desired should
be done and what in practice could be done. During the first two or three years
this duty was discharged mainly by H. J. Shearn, W. Crawford, F. B. Edgell and
E. Housden, the latter for a number of years thereafter giving his full time to
this service. In later years the Pilgrim Service expanded considerably.
The brethren
were of course already accustomed to meeting together in General Conventions,
usually at public holiday times and lasting several days. The initial 1919
Convention at East Ham Town Hall set the pattern and it was plain that a
similar annual event was generally demanded. Agreeably to this, a national
Convention over the three days of August Bank Holiday week-end in London was
instituted-this was still going on more than half a century later-and for the
first five years from 1920 was held at the South Place Institute, London
attended by conventioneers from all over the country. These gatherings brought
brethren together who otherwise would not have known each other, so cementing
what traditionally had been known as "the tie that binds". Other
Conventions held by the three principal assemblies in Britain, Forest Gate,
Glasgow and Manchester, usually at Easter or Whitsun, made their contribution
to the general weal.
All this
activity was very fine and satisfying, but the brethren were not out to set up
a kind of religious club and mutual admiration society in which all the
preaching was to be to the converted. The Bible Student faith was essentially a
missionary faith, and they wanted evangelistic literature, plenty of it, freely
available as it had been in former days.
And so, in
1920, six months after the formation of the Committee, the printers were
brought into the picture.
The call was
for tracts, four page folders, the size of a modern newspaper, containing a
mass of Scriptural information, of the kind they had used in former years.
Henry Shearn was not so sure. He knew that most of these enthusiasts had been
carrying bundles of such tracts from street to street for many years and did
not realize that as time went on that habit would not come so easily. After
all, those old-time tracts did weigh thirty-three pounds per thousand and a
good "volunteer", as they were then termed, would reckon to put out
five hundred an hour in average territory. Tracts now would have to be of more
modest proportions both from the point of view of cost and the tract distributors’
abilities. And he also had another idea.
That idea was
the "Kingdom Card".
The Kingdom
Card was a small green card a little smaller than an ordinary postcard. On one
side it bore a message calling attention to the significance of current events in
relation to Biblical foreviews of the future plans of God. The other side had
the address of the Committee and a space for the enquirer to write his name and
address. The sender of the card received a selection of literature and details
of local meetings. From the production point of view the cards were cheap and
for door-to-door distribution easy to carry in quantity.
The scheme was
an immediate success. The first cards came off the press early in 1920 and the
first printing of 20,000 was immediately exhausted. In later years the annual
circulation reached nearly a quarter of a million per annum and there were
three depots in suitable centers of the UK for their dispatch to users. The
response from the "public" considerably exceeded that customary from
the old-time tracts and the idea "caught on" everywhere. In later
years extra help had to be brought in to the London office to cope with the
flood of enquires.
Of course
suitable "back-up" literature had to be provided to supplement the
Kingdom Card, which after all was only a means to elicit an interested inquiry.
Therefore from 1921 onward there was an annual production and consumption of
four-page leaflets dealing with subjects such as "Why God permits
Evil", "A Dark Cloud and its Silver Lining", "Which is the
True Gospel", "Thy Kingdom Come", "A Better Day
Coming", and so on. By the end of the decade a quarter million such tracts
had been distributed.
All this
brought to the front the question of publishing larger books devoted to
expositions of Faith. Particularly was it desired to have access to an edition
of the traditional textbook, the "Divine Plan of the Ages" without
the old Society imprint. The upshot was the production in 1922 of what is
probably the most handsome edition of the "Divine Plan" ever
published. Full library size, bound in dark blue cloth with gold blocked title,
with frontispiece photograph of the author, this became the standard edition
among the brethren for twenty years. The published imprint was threefold-Bible
Students Committee of London, Pastoral Bible Institute of Brooklyn, and Berean
Bible Institute of Melbourne. With these latter organizations, break-away
movements originating at the same time as the Bible Students Committee-and
still existing-the British brethren enjoyed friendly relations from the start.
The project was carried through by the Committee and the book was printed in
England, the other two organizations taking their share of the edition for
their own use and sharing the cost accordingly. The printing plates were held
by the Committee until the Second World War and only disposed of when it was
realized that modern printing methods rendered the heavy copper plates
obsolete.
The astute mind
of H. J. Shearn soon perceived that the vigor with which this edition of the
"Divine Plan" was being circulated would very soon give rise to a
demand for something less costly than the full-blown library edition and the
result was his masterly abbreviation of the full 350-page book into the compass
of 100 pages, still preserving its essential message. This was issued towards
the end of 1922 under the title "The Plan of God in Brief", with an
attractive gold and green stiff paper cover. In the first six months over five
thousand copies were taken up and distributed. The demand continued through the
years; in 1932 a second edition had to be printed and a third in 1938 which
lasted until 1948.
Two years later
saw the production of two more modest clothbound books directed, not toward
evangelical work as was the "Divine Plan", but to the interests of
the brethren themselves.
There was
foreseen, by the more thoughtful, a coming need for a succinct and clear-cut
definition of the essential doctrines of Christian theology in the light of the
typical Bible Student position. Traditionally, all this was covered by the
expositions contained in Volumes 5 and 6 of "Studies in the
Scriptures" but these, although still available, bore the imprint of the
system which had been repudiated and which in any case was now moving into a
condition of belief, activity and outlook from which the brethren had turned
away and could not endorse.
Already
inquiries as to what could be done to remedy this situation were coming in to
the Committee, and the result was a general discussion at the 1924 annual
convention and a reference back to all the associated brethren in the UK for
opinions; the majority verdict was that the use of the "Studies in the
Scriptures: bearing the offending imprint was considered unwise as tending to
perpetuate in the public mind a connection with the old Society which was no
longer the case, but not much could be done about it unless the Committee could
see its way to republish over its own imprint. In consequence of the heavy
publishing expenses already incurred, this was not practicable.
What was done,
however, was to publish in this same year two modest clothbound books, "A
Review of the Doctrines" and Doctrines and Disciplines" which set out
comparatively briefly the doctrinal outlook of the brethren; these publications
went into use for the enlightenment of new adherents to the fellowship. (Twenty
years later a more recent breakaway movement in the USA, the "Dawn Bible
Students Association", did publish the complete set of "Studies in
the Scriptures" over their own imprint and this solved the problem for the
British brethren.) In 1930 the Committee published a book by Benjamin Barton
entitled "God’s Covenants" dealing with the Scriptural doctrines of
the Covenants, the Ransom, the Sin-Offering, and Justification; this enjoyed a
moderate circulation and was available up to the time of the Second Word War.
Within the
space of five years, therefore, a mass of useful literature came into being and
one of the essential purposes of the central publishing Committee was being well
fulfilled-a plentiful supply of useful agents in the general evangelical work
which was being carried on.
But the
principal event for which 1924 stands out was the birth of the "Bible
Student Monthly".
It was realized
from the start that a suitable periodical journal was a "must" for
the new fellowship. The journal of the Pastoral Bible Institute in Brooklyn,
the "Herald of Christ’s Kingdom", had begun to fill the gap for
many-the Committee acted as its British agent for this journal and its
circulation in the UK increased steadily for some ten years. but in this as in
other spheres there was a strong feeling of independence, that the British
fellowship needed to be as truly national as possible.
Hence in
mid-1924 the first number of the new journal appeared, under the editorship of
Ebenezer Housden. It was very modest compared with the same journal as it
exists to-day, but it was a start. Confining itself at that time in the main to
articles of Christian uplift and instruction, one of its uses was the
dissemination of notices of conventions, pilgrim trips, and the like,
activities of local assemblies, and news of general interest.
its original
title was "B.S.C. Monthly", but in 1927 a suggestion was made that
this be changed to "Bible Students Monthly" and at Whitsun General
Convention held in Huddersfield that year this was agreed with acclamation. (A
further change to "Bible Study Monthly" was made in 1952 on account
of some confusion in the public mind with the old Society, and this is the
title under which it is published to-day.) There were other efforts. In 1925
the Glasgow Church commenced the publication of the "Associated Bible
Students Magazine" on a more ambitious scale than the "Monthly";
this was probably its undoing, for although well written and well produced it
failed to "make the grade" and disappeared after a few years. Frank
Edgell left the Committee in 1923 to devote himself to the production of a
little journal called "Fellowship", which still continues under another
editorship-Frank Edgell died in 1965. The "Dawn" brethren in USA, who
appeared in 1930, began to publish the "Dawn", which has a limited
circulation in the UK. The Bible Study Monthly remains the principal journal
and in fact has increased its circulation to most parts of the world, and
inside the UK finds readers, both laymen and ministers, in about all Christian
denominations to an extent where the "denominational" readers
considerably outnumber the brethren for whose use it was originally instituted.
It may be that this
is the point to interject a short sketch of one small community of UK Bible
Students which has kept itself somewhat aloof from the main body. Back in 1916
when Paul Johnson of USA figured prominently in events in this country there
were a few who endorsed his actions and formed a nucleus of supporters
remaining in touch with him. When, later on, and back in America, he organized
the Laymen’s Home Missionary Movement these elected to count themselves members
in this country. Under the impression fostered by Johnson that they alone
represent the true remnant of the original Bible Student movement they have
pursued a separate course through the years, holding very tenaciously to the
outlook and work characteristic of Brother Russell but in addition looking upon
Paul Johnson as his Divinely ordained successor whose direction in matters of
faith and conduct must be obeyed implicitly. Since that was the issue upon
which the British brethren as a whole seceded in the first place it is not
surprising the idea found little support elsewhere. There was not much point in
rejecting Rutherford if Johnson and his successors-he died in 1952-were to be
accepted in lieu, and in point of fact virtually everyone in the UK wanted no
more to do with him after the events of 1916.
The LHMM
however is to be commended for its missionary enterprise and, too, the deep
sense of utter consecration to the Lord’s service manifested by its members. In
more recent years they are chiefly represented in the Midlands, and their zeal
for the promulgation of the Faith is worthy of all emulation. Their insistence
that each assembly and individual must accept the direction and interpretation
of Scripture of the movement’s leader, as one appointed by the Lord to that
office, tends to preclude any organic connection or mutual co-operative
service, and this is felt by many to be a matter of regret. Nevertheless they
must be regarded as part of the fellowship notwithstanding their reluctance to
join in with the main body.
So 1925, six
years after the formal secession, saw the process virtually completed and the
new fellowship in full operation, with conventions and pilgrim service
operating as it had done formerly, local meetings prospering as they always had
done, and plentiful supply of literature wherewith the message of the Kingdom
could be proclaimed. By this time the number of associated assemblies had
increased to just under 200-the true number was almost certainly appreciably
more for these are the ones that are known and can be deduced from records and
it is a fact that many independent meetings sprang up and never appeared in any
records. Close contact was maintained with organized brethren in USA,
Australia, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland. The country-and the
world-was slowly recovering from the effects of the First World War and the
future, from the Truth activity point of view, looked rosy.
During 1924
William Crawford, a brother of long standing and held in high esteem, first a t
Glasgow and later in London, began to express his feeling that there was need
to lay increased stress, by means of printed page, on the necessity of
"sound doctrine".
This, as far as
it went, was good; most of the brethren accepted that principle and there were
no doctrinal divergencies in the fellowship at that time-some did emerge
later-and the necessity for this apparently undue emphasis did not appeal to
the majority. Crawford laid a proposal that the Committee endorse and publish
his views of the doctrinal basis of the Faith.
The Committee
were not convinced that said views, or at any rate his method of expressing
them, did justify their undertaking so to do. Voting on the motion resulted in
two members being in favor and five against. Conscious however of the
fundamental principle of the fellowship, that direction does not come from the
organizing center but from the fellowship, the proposal was put to the country
at large. This was the third time a national referendum had been called for in
the five years of the Committee’s existence. On this occasion it took five
months to notify what was now a considerably augmented fellowship and to get
all the votes in. The result was an overwhelming rejection of the proposal.
William
Crawford accepted this decision in good heart and decided that he himself would
publish the matters he had in mind, and find his own means of publicity, in all
of which the Committee wished him God-speed. In consequence, the first issue of
"Old Paths Publications" appeared in 1925 and found a ready
circulation among some of the brethren. There was no editorial name attached
but of course everybody knew that Crawford was behind the effort. Realizing
that he could hardly remain on the Committee without to some extent involving
it with the publication, he resigned in 1924 to devote himself to his chosen
work. Crawford, a dour Scot, tended to be rather dogmatic on doctrinal matters
and sometimes condemnatory of what he regarded as laxity in doctrinal belief
and so did not always appeal to the majority-although it might well be suggested
that at least one doctrinal watchdog in the fellowship could be useful-but
there were many who did appreciate his characteristic ministry and he continued
to be a popular speaker at conventions, although liable to exceed the normal
time of sixty minutes. He is known to have continued in full spate for two
hours at a stretch oblivious to a certain amount of surreptitious consulting of
watches and dwindling of his audience as first one and then another quietly
slipped out to catch their train home. Which brings to mind one semi-humorous
incident at a Conway Hall convention in 1931 where William was the Sunday
morning speaker. Now the catering arrangements at Conway Hall were really
inadequate for the numbers attending the Annual Convention and speakers were
warned to adhere to the program timing to avoid dislocating the later sessions.
Of course no one really expected William Crawford to be conscious of the lapse
of time when on the rostrum. True to form, half-past twelve came when the
session should end and he was just getting into his subject. Fifteen more
minutes passed, and he had not yet arrived at the "Finally,
brethren," which usually betokened at least another twenty minutes.
Brother H__, Chairman of the Convention for that day, was, and is, never one to
suffer long speakers gladly, and here he envisaged a frantic rush for meals and
inevitable late running for the rest of the day. He made his way to the rear of
the platform, came up quietly behind the speaker, who was still in full cry,
laid a paper on the rostrum before him inscribed "TIME TO STOP", and
retired as quietly, thinking the speaker would take the point and bring his
exhortation to a gently but expeditious close. Not so the redoubtable William;
he took up the paper, looked at it, and announced to his audience "Brother
H__ thinks its time I stopped" and promptly did so. There must have been
quite a few in that company at that moment who felt the same as Brother H__.
The "Old
Paths Publications" continued for thirty years until William Crawford’s
death in 1957. He had a long and honorable career amongst the brethren, one of
the first to accept the faith way back about 1885 in Glasgow, a period as elder
in the Glasgow Church until coming to London in 1911 and then a leading part in
the formation of the independent fellowship in 1919.
By 1925
therefore the teething troubles were over and the fellowship sailed into calmer
waters. By now the rearguard which had remained at the London Tabernacle and at
one or two other of the larger centers in a hopeless resistance to the changing
order of things there had either given up the fight or been eliminated and all
were together in one camp, working together for the future. From this date,
additions to the number from that source began to decline sharply; most of
those who were going to "come out" had done so and the total number
of independent brethren in the country was approaching four thousand. Naturally
enough, the widening range of choice of able brethren was reflected in the
composition of the Committee-successive annual elections showed a swing away
from the initial preponderance of London brethren to bring in more from the
provinces. The period 1925-30 was one in which Tom Holmes of Nottingham, Rob
Court of Birmingham, William Drinkwater of Nottingham, William Humphrey of
Huddersfield, Tomas Smedley of East Kirkby, William Wileman of Doncaster,
Walter Morrall of Morecambe, all served for greater or lesser terms in the
central administration. It cannot be said that here was a ruling clique which
maintained its own permanence and kept all power in its own hands. The votes of
the brethren nationwide ensured a periodic infusion of "new blood",
to the advantage of the fellowship. Only Henry Shearn remained, from inception
until his retirement. The universal respect and affection in which he was held
ensured that.
Two traditional
activities which it was attempted to revive in this decade proved
disappointing. The colporteur work of the pre-1916 period had been so effective
that quite naturally the brethren assumed it could be restored as of yore. From
1925 and for about ten years thereafter sporadic attempts were made by a few to
get back "on the road" using the new edition of the Divine Plan as
the principal medium. But the public taste was changing.
People were not
so interested in religion at the doors. The post-war generation was not so
receptive as had been the pre-war.
Although at any
one time over this period up to about ten brethren in various parts of the
country were thus engaged it proved to be an unprofitable exercise and as such
it gradually died out and was no more.
The other
activity was in the field of public lectures. The natural assumption was that
the large audiences normal in the pre-war years would come again-but they did
not. There were several reasons for this. It was not lack of zeal or effort on
the part of the brethren. The 1920 decade was one in which a great many were
disillusioned with religion-the recent world war had done that.
Times were
hard, re-adjustment to normal life was slow and painful. The radio had just
been invented and it was a novelty to sit at home and listen to a speaker from
the British Broadcasting Company’s radio station, and perhaps a little more
comfortable than going out to hear a speaker in the local hall. (In 1928 the
BBC did invite Henry Shearn to give a fifteen minutes presentation of the Bible
Students faith "on the air". He declined, saying he could not say
what he wanted to say in fifteen minutes-perhaps this was a mistake; the
invitation was never repeated.) Rather better fortune was experienced in the
1930s but for the present there was little appeal. A typical example was a
lecture held in Woolwich Town Hall, South-East London, where in 1910 Pastor
Russell had addressed a thousand local people. In 1927 a hundred and twenty
were present. Other efforts during the decade showed the same falling off in
interest so that review of the position by leading brethren in 1928 expressed
the opinion that in this form of witness "results are not good".
Slowly the lesson was being learned that as one generation succeeds another
outlooks and standards change and with them must change methods of preaching
the Gospel which in itself never changes.
Public lectures
went on for many years after this decade but no longer with the expectation of
thousands of attendants. Yet the Lord did say once "Who hath despised the
day of small things?"
In a different
direction there was real effect. A suggestion was made in 1922 that an
effective avenue of service might be to the blind. At that time there was
little organized provision for reading aids for such. Discussions by those
interested led to an approach to the Committee for investigation into
possibilities.
The outcome was
the introduction of a Braille lending library of Truth literature. The initial
cost was heavy but adequate funds were forthcoming. By 1924 the "Divine
Plan of the Ages" had been rendered into Braille together with a number of
short dissertations on subjects of interest. The "Divine Plan"
comprised six Braille volumes each fourteen by ten inches, three inches thick,
and installments were sent by post to interested readers. At the start
fifty-five such volumes, including five complete sets of the "Divine Plan",
were produced and put into stock. Brethren everywhere were encouraged to seek
out the blind in their own districts and send in names of those desiring to
receive this service. Thirty-six such names were enrolled almost immediately
and the system went into operation.
Following a
further suggestion, a hundred single sheets containing favorite hymns were
added to the compendium in the feeling that some might appreciate being able to
read words probably already familiar.
1925 saw the
addition of Volume 5. "The Atonement", and the book "Tabernacle
Shadows" in Braille. The number of readers had increased and were located
all over the country from Brighton on the South Coast to Thurso in the north of
Scotland.
Three years
later a number of treatises dealing with various aspects of Scripture
especially relating to events betokening the end of the Age and the coming
Millennial reign of Christ were added to the growing library and the little
party of brethren who were handling this aspect of the work found themselves
fully occupied in packing, dispatching, recording and receiving the constant
interchange of books. In 1930 it was reported that the books in stock were
fully in use and this continued until 1934 when Volume 2, "The Time is a
Hand", was added together with another three dozen "Millennial"
treatises and part of the Scenario of the "Photo-Drama of Creation".
1937 saw the last conversion to Braille in the form of Volume 6. "The New
Creation", this work appearing in the form of seven bulky Braille volumes
which were sent to readers one at a time.
By 1940 the
original books, read and re-read scores of times, had become so worn with use
that they were practically unreadable.
Only the
latest, Volume 6, was in suitable condition for continuing use. Simultaneously
the national public libraries had awakened to this problem and were supplying
increasing examples of Braille literature of all descriptions for the blind. It
became obvious that no useful purpose was going to be served by renewing the
worn-out copies, and so in 1943 the Braille library was closed down and the
useless copies destroyed. For twenty years it had served a useful purpose and
many had appreciated the message who otherwise might never have heard it.
Another avenue
of service which found a ready field of action was the institution of the
Benevolent Fund. Right at the inauguration of the new fellowship in 1919 it was
felt, and expressed during Convention proceedings, that some thought should be
given to the plight of brethren adversely affected by the aftermath of
war-which had ended only nine months previously. The consequence was the
institution of a fund from which the needs of such could be met (there was no
such thing as Social Security in those days-the final end of the very poor was
the workhouse). With the burning words of the Apostle James in mind, the
administration of the fund was vested in the central Committee with exhortation
to see that, again in the words of James, the needy were "warmed and
filled". Financially, the Fund was well supported from the start by
well-wishers. The need, and its satisfaction, increased as the country-and the
world-moved towards the great financial and economic recession of 1930 and by
that time not only money but also clothing, used and new, and necessary home
soft furnishments such as linen were being freely donated. A measure of the
scale of this work is afforded by the fact that in 1933 there were no less than
sixteen distributing centers in England and Scotland staffed by volunteer
brethren who received and stored the articles, and dispatched them in
accordance with intimations sent from central office. Brethren all over the
country were desired to notify any case of apparent need coming under their
notice and suitable action was then taken. The need was particularly great in
South Wales where a considerable number of brethren in the mining valleys were
for a long time without work, without money, without food, and had it not been
for their fervent faith, without hope. So late as the middle of the 1930s, when
the burden was beginning to lift, the Christian fortitude of those South Wales
brethren became almost proverbial, and in the wondrous economy of God, they
became an inspiration to others.
The
introduction of the Government Social Security system in 1948 eased the burden
on this Benevolent Fund but there has always been a need in some quarters to be
met and it continued and is still functioning. After the Second World War aid
to brethren in Germany became a feature; also the administration of the Fund
passed into the hands of a separate committee set up for the purpose.
The second half
of the decade witnessed a sharp acceleration of Pilgrim activity. The
considerable increase in the number of local assemblies was the principal
reason for this combined with the growing realization that the all-British
independent Bible Student movement was a reality and had come to stay. For some
years Ebenezer Housden had traveled England and Scotland with an occasional
trip to Ireland; in 1928 he was joined by Thomas Smedley and between them they
made over three hundred visits to local centers. In 1929 they were joined for a
short time by Henry Shearn for a similar program. In 1930 Housden had to give
up but Tom Holmes came in to fill the gap with a somewhat lower total of
visits, and later George Ford of Luton rendered similar service, and until the
end of the 1930s a full program of such visits was maintained.
In addition to
this ministry by British brethren there were also visits by brethren from
overseas. In 1924 Brother Blackburn from USA visited this country at the
invitation of the BSC and ministered to thirty local meetings. In 1926 Isaac
Hoskins came at the invitation of the forest Gate Church and served similarly,
spending six months in this country. Then in 1929 R. B.
Nicholson of
the Berean Bible Institute of Australia followed at BSC invitation for the same
purpose. It was agreed on all sides that the brethren were being well served by
a succession of visiting brethren as they had never been in th pre-secession
years. Throughout the 1930s almost every year saw one or more from USA or the
Continent on tour in this country.
1926-30
witnessed a decline in the number of General Conventions. The economic
condition of the country was worsening, unemployment was rising, the economic
collapse of 1930 was not far off, and the cost of travel and accommodation for
the three or four days’ convention centered in one of the big cities was
becoming a serious consideration. a general referendum in 1925 indicated a
strong preference for the organization of a greater number of local
"Home-gatherings" where the attendance could be expected to be in the
100/150 range in lieu of the big city General Conventions with attendances of
600. Birmingham and Huddersfield did hold 4-day and 3-day Conventions but in
the main the alternative proposal held the field.
The
"Home-gathering" derived its name from the fact that it was a one-day
gathering of brethren within a defined area, perhaps six or seven adjacent local
meetings, rather than one drawing its attendants from the entire country. It
had the merit of low travelling cost and elimination of overnight accommodation
expenses and could be held on any convenient week-end instead of the statutory
Bank Holiday week-end. During times of economic depression when money was
scarce it had its merits and attractions. Such gatherings had been a feature of
the communal fellowship since the rise of the new order of things, in 1919, but
concurrent with the beginning of the economic crisis in 1927 the number took a
sharp upward rise. Thus 1927 saw at least fifteen such gatherings, in places as
far apart as Worthing, Dartford, Cardiff, Bath, Bristol, in the South, to
Wombwell and Mansfield in the North. 1928 had twenty with others unrecorded,
and 1929 nearer thirty. The peak was reached in 1936 with more than forty such
events, the attendances ranging between 70 and 250. There was never a year in
later times without its tally of Home-gatherings each of which was, to the local
assembly which organized it and were hosts to the visitors, the high-light of
the year.
A typical
report appearing in the "Monthly" for January 1936 illustrates the
spirit of such gatherings. The report was submitted by an "old-time"
believer, Brother Carter of Tunbridge Wells, a little man with a big heart and
boundless enthusiasm. "We of the little class at Tunbridge Wells had a
most happy gathering on October 17. having dear brothers and sisters from many
districts, and their bright and loving faces were a real inspiration. They know
best who were present, but we had in mind dear brethren from all over the
country, and such helpful messages from the brethren at Warrington and
Birmingham and many from the classes round about London. Dear Br. Ward gave a very
helpful address in the afternoon and dear Bro. Nicholson in the evening, with
about 90 friends listening to the message."
He did not
include the humorous "gaffe" he perpetrated in his address of welcome
to the visitors. The hymn "Like a river glorious, Is God’s perfect
peace". (No. 212 in the "Bible Students Hymnal") had been sung,
in which the first part of vs 3 runs "Every joy or trial, Falleth from
above, Traced upon our DIAL, by the sun of love". The reference, of course,
is to the sun-dial, upon which the sun makes its mark. Brother Carter, however,
in his innocent simplicity, knew only of the English slang term
"dial" for "face", and so he came out with "When I
look at all your happy faces, I think I have never seen such a collection of
shining dials in all my life". The ripple of amusement which went round
the hall only served to accentuate the spirit of good fellowship of the
occasion.
At this time
there were something like 240 regular assemblies in the country, ranging from
the big city churches like Glasgow and Forest Gate with about 400 members each,
through places like Manchester, Birmingham, Bristol, Nottingham, where
member-ship was in the order of 100 to 150, down to the country town or village
groups of ten or twenty. These were, of course, the active members; most groups
of any size had a more or less regular fringe of interested people who normally
attended the Sunday services without taking any appreciable part in the
evangelical activities, and these, especially in the cities, would increase the
attendance appreciably. A conservative estimate of the really active membership
based on such records as remain would put it at about four thousand in 1930.
Hereto the
annual London Convention had been arranged by the Committee, this tradition
stemming from the 1919 East Ham Town Hall Convention which started the whole
thing. Now there were plenty of brethren in the London area capable of handling
such a Convention by themselves. And so the 1931 Convention was mooted.
Conway Hall, a
brand new building in the center of London, was ideal for the purpose. It had
been built for the London Ethical Society to preplace their former less
commodious home, the South Place Institute in Finsbury Circus, which had been
the venue for the Bible Students Conventions in earlier years. Just completed
and about to be formally opened for use, this Convention was the first function
to be held within its walls. In after years it became a household word among
the UK brethren-annual conventions were held here practically annually, except
for the wartime years, with an occasional change to another venue before the
war, until 1970. The season was Easter, and the Convention started on Good
Friday and continued without intermission until Easter Monday. Its seating capacity
of 600 was completely filled during most of the time and since a proportion
were able to attend only for two days or perhaps three, it is probable that
nearly a thousand brethren were there at one time or another. Isaac Hoskins of
the Pastoral Bible Institute, Brooklyn, had been invited by the Forest Gate
Church to visit this country and he became the guest speaker, supported by a
panel of British speakers from all parts of the UK from Glasgow in the north to
London in the south.
The
Convention ended, and the conventioneers returned to their homes radiant in the
spiritual uplift they had received and buoyed up by blissful expectations for
the future. Not many knew that these days of progress and building and
increasing numbers were destined to give place to a time of pausing in
building, and the consolidation of that which had been achieved, ....... The
years were piling up; some of these brethren who had known the activities of
the Harvest and gone through the difficult times of the secession were now beginning
to feel the weight of years and realize that for them the tempo of life must
henceforth be in lower key. A younger generation was coming to the front, a
generation that had never known the days of the Harvest preaching or the dark
times of the secession, and because they had never known these things, and
because they were the younger generation, must inevitably view the Faith-and
the future-from their own angle. That was going to make a difference. That was
a hard thing for many of the older ones to accept; it always is, in any
generation. Something of the old zest was going to be lost, and something of
the old outlook. But the work of the Truth went on.
8 MERIDIAN
DAY
THE DECADE
commencing with 1930 was uneventful compared with that preceding. The trauma of
the separation was in the past; the flurry of activity involved in building up
the organization and getting used to the new order of things was over;
conventions and pilgrim service, and, to a lesser extent, "public
witness", were proceeding normally, as they had done in the past, and the
prospect seemed "set fair" for the future.
Nevertheless
there was a difference. It was not because the public meetings were less in
number than of yore, that when they were held the attendances were numbered in
hundreds rather than thousands, or in tens rather than in hundreds. The ardor
for proclaiming what was usually called the "gospel of the kingdom"
was as strong as ever and not dampened by the lesser response. It was not that
there was anything wrong with the fellowship or the meetings. There were now
more than 240 separate assemblies in the United Kingdom, associated together,
aggregating between them about four thousand brethren and a considerable number
of sympathizers attending Sunday meetings. There were plenty of holiday and
week-end conventions at which the brethren could get together; the pilgrim
service effected a much greater number of class visits than had ever been known
in the pre-1916 days. There seemed everything to encourage and little if any
cause for despondency.
The difference
resided not in these things but in a growing realization that the traditional
expectation of a speedy ending of the Age and inauguration of the Millennial
Kingdom had been too optimistic. The outbreak of World War 1 in 1914,
justifying the forty years’ prior expectation of the event, had persuaded
virtually all the faithful that the remainder of the predicted events would
follow without delay. Then all would be over and the new Age established. No
one dreamed at that time how long the old world would take to die. To-day, more
than seventy years later, it can be seen more clearly how the issues involved
required a much longer time than was then visualized. Yet that seventy years
has seen most of the expected events transpire and pass into history, and the
"world that now is" into its death-throes.
There was
nothing wrong with the expectation except the timing, but those earnest souls
of 1930 could not be expected to know that, and there was manifest an element
of uncertainty as to what the future might hold which rather tended to blunt
the edge of the witness and limit the force of the proclamation.
So the
nineteen-thirties were quieter. It was generally conceded that the time, money
and effort absorbed by the promotion of public meetings was not being justified
by results and this aspect of activity was gradually lessened. Glasgow arranged
a series of five successive meetings in 1933 and got an average attendance of
70. Warrington in the same year could get only 35. Abertillery in South Wales,
in a series of seven, had 100 in one meeting but 60 or less at the others.
Gateshead in 1939 distributed five thousand leaflets from door to door,
advertised in the local Press and had slides shown in all the local cinemas.
Fifty turned up.
The one bright
star-not very bright at that-in this decade was when Norman Woodworth of the
USA "Dawn" came to England in 1938 and addressed a chain of public
meetings in nine British cities from London to Glasgow, followed up with eleven
more addressed by various British brethren; the highest attendance was 360 and
the lowest 80. A far cry indeed from those days when the Royal Albert Hall in
London, and the St. Andrews Hall in Glasgow, and the Manchester Hippodrome in
Manchester, used to be crowded with five or six thousand people. The message
that had found so ready a lodgment in the hearts of the 1910 generation did not
have the same appeal in 1930 and so the brethren turned their attention to
other methods of evangelism.
The obvious
alternative was to intensify the general distribution of leaflets, door to door
or by other means. This always had an attraction for there were so many ways of
doing this, some bordering on the bizarre. Horace Norris of Abertillery, for
example-if there had been an award for the champion tract distributor of the
United Kingdom Horace would almost certainly have won it-developed the practice
of enclosing tracts in glass bottles and throwing them into the River Usk, from
whence they passed into the Bristol Channel and so into the open sea. Inquiries
from people who had found and opened the bottles frequently came in from the
North Wales coast to the Thames Estuary. "Tracting parties" of the
younger people from large assemblies set out on their bicycles at week-ends to
deluge country towns with the message of the Kingdom. Even if the results were
meager, the benefits to the distributors were considerable, in renewed
enthusiasm and determination to continue in the way. The scale of the work was
nothing like former times when the number of tracts distributed annually ran
into millions. Something like several hundred thousand per.annum was now the
norm; it was becoming evident that advancing age was limiting the efforts of
the "old stalwarts" and their younger successors were noticeably
fewer in number. But it was still true-as it probably was and is of every
Christian community-that quite a few heard for the first time of the Divine
Plan in this way and, accepting it, came into full fellowship with the
brethren.
Notwithstanding
these factors, most years saw the issue of several new titles, supplied free of
charge to the users. Conscious of the need for judicious use on this account-as
were most of the assemblies and brethren using them-the friends at Barrow-in- Furness
advised the "Monthly" of their methods; their words are repeated here
as they appeared in the June 1937 issue in connection with two new leaflets
"Peace on Earth-When?" and "World Order-or Chaos?", both of
which seemed to have elicited more than usual interest among the public. Said
the Barrow-in-Furness assembly "With regard to the "Peace on
Earth" our members are witnessing by this means in the North-West and have
adopted-not a promiscuous, wasteful method-but a select and methodical
arrangement, as follows: (a) all clergymen, lay ministers, local preachers,
some by post if necessary in remote areas (b) all men and women whom we know
are religiously inclined, and attend a place of worship (c) intelligent people
who we know are interested in the subject of peace from a political viewpoint
(d) canvassing from door to door with a personal inquiry as to whether the
householder is interested in the subject, and will the leaflet be read? We have
felt that this is likely to get them into right channels with a higher possible
percentage of potential readers, and the few words of conversation arising have
in some cases been encouraging".
It was the
system of "Kingdom Cards", introduced in 1922, which was the
highlight of this decade. Year by year the number distributed increased and the
resultant inquiries followed suit.
The three stock
depots at strategic points in the country were kept busy meeting the demand and
brethren everywhere were disposing of them in every manner their ingenuity
could suggest, and dealing with the resultant inquiries emanating from their
locality. From the early 1920s, when the annual circulation ranged around
thirty to fifty thousand, the mid-1930s clocked up annual figures approaching a
quarter of a million. A significant feature of the outbreak of war in 1939 is
the fact that, as recorded in the minutes of a Bible Students Committee meeting
held on October 22, 1939, the three weeks following the outbreak of war in
September of that year saw the normal rate of inquiries exactly doubled. As
with the earlier occasion in 1914, the coming of war caused a good many people
to remember that the Bible Students had been saying something about this for a
long time.
As an example
of the general feeling there is quoted here a report from the Guildford group
published in the June 1937 "Monthly".
"We have
been delighted in the way the Father has blessed our efforts in this corner of
the vineyard, through disseminating Kingdom Cards, which portray the unrest
taking place, and evidences of God’s Kingdom shortly to be established amongst
men; inviting those hungering for a clearer knowledge of the tidings of great
joy. The response has been very encouraging.
How
enthusiastic we ought to be for the development of his plans and purposes. We
have experienced real joy visiting those who were so interested in the
"Kingdom" as to send for further information." A year later
Guildford was still as enthusiastic, as witness the (abbreviated) extract from
their exhortation to the brethren at large in the July 1938 issue: "Our
Lord commenced his ministry by Lk 4:18, proclaiming the good tidings of the
Kingdom.....The nearness of the Kingdom calls for great activity in the service
of the Master. What an opportunity.’..... Are we going to ignore the message?
..... Kingdom cards are free to all classes and to individuals willing to use
them judiciously ..... Let us be filled with the spirit of the Master .....
Have you all made use of the Kingdom cards and covered the whole territory?: If
not, send to the London office for a supply, and you will receive a blessing
that will fill your hearts with joy and gladness. Let us demonstrate to our
Father that the desire for service is in our hearts."
Sadly, the war
killed the Kingdom Card scheme. War exigencies and shortage of paper produced
the Paper Control Order, and Government permits had to be secured for paper and
card needed for printing purposes. The "powers that be" decreed that
the Kingdom Card was "non-essential" and no paper could be granted.
The printing of tracts was rendered difficult for the same reason and little
was done in this direction while the war lasted. And when it was over changed
conditions militated against the resurrection of the Kingdom Card; it remained
in the minds of many a cherished memory.
The period
1930-40 saw some revival of interest in the colporteur work. Little had been
done in this direction during the preceding decade but with supplies of various
"Truth" publications available under the imprint of the Committee
there was no year over this period without at least half-a-dozen colporteurs
calling on householders with the "Divine Plan" and some auxiliary
publications. Difficulties there were; it was inevitable that the callers
should be identified with members of another by now well-known organization
with a much more aggressive message. It became increasingly evident that this
method of making known the message of the Kingdom was not going to be very
profitable; the war years rendered it rather impracticable and the last
colporteur known to the records gave up in 1941.
So the tendency
during this phase of the fellowship tended rather to greater emphasis upon its
internal life, the Conventions, the Pilgrim Service and class meetings.
Conventions continued unabated; the August national London Convention was the
high-light of the year, run a close second by Nottingham at Whitsun up to 1936,
followed by the next two years at Dewsbury, then finally Leicester. Easter each
year was the traditional time for Warrington, and the annual Glasgow Convention
completed the series. Towards the end of the period the attendances began to
fall off a little, a reflection of advancing age of many of the
participants-after all, some of them had been in the way for thirty or more
years and that fact was beginning to show-but the fervor of the fellowship
remained and the spirit was the same. So it was with the lesser events, the
more local week-end "Home-gatherings", which by 1936 were running at
an all-time "high", no less than forty being recorded for that year,
ranging all over the country from Glasgow and Sunderland in the north to Yeovil
and Ipswich in the south, with attendances of between 70 and 250 at each.
A well-known
figure in the fellowship from the beginning, and coming into prominence during
the 1930s, was Dr. Adam Rutherford. Coming from a family associated with the
Truth almost from its beginning in the UK, and himself a member of the Royal
Geographical Society, various other learned bodies, and one of the country’s
leading mathematicians, Adam combined with his passionate allegiance to the
faith a deep interest in the acknowledged scientific and claimed religious
features associated with the Great Pyramid in Egypt. He was, of course, only
one of many eminent men in the last two centuries-and of past ages into
antiquity-who have professed this interest, but his writings on the subject,
eventually condensed into his four-volume work "Pyramidology"
probably exceeded those of any of his predecessors. Working closely in
conjunction with the Egyptian authorities, to whom he was well known, he
carried out a great amount of research at the Pyramid itself over many years.
As the founder
and first President of the Institute of Pyramidology, he edited the journal he
founded, "Pyramidology", until his death in 1950, ending a career
spent in travelling the world lecturing on his chosen subject and disposing of
many copies of the "Divine Plan of the Ages" in the process. What
ever the merits or demerits of his special subject, the fact remains that from
the point of view of most interest to the brethren, he probably circulated more
copies of that book during his thirty years or so of active life than anyone
else, and on that account alone deserves remembrance. A cheerful and
irrepressible man of unbounded enthusiasm, he was loyal to the faith he
espoused to the end.
Twenty years
earlier John and Morton Edgar of Glasgow had evinced considerable interest in
the same subject; for many years thereafter Morton at least spent a great deal
of time in Egypt on the same kind of research. The result of their endeavors
was the appearance of a two-volume work, "Great Pyramid Passages",
which enjoyed a wide circulation not only among the brethren but in the wider
world-as indeed did the later work of Adam Rutherford.
1936 also saw
the birth of another Journal, started and published by the Forest Gate Church,
named accordingly the "Forest Gate Bible Monthly" it nevertheless
attained a wide circulation among the UK brethren and quite a number also went
abroad. Declining numbers within that Church led to its publication being
terminated in 1985 with expressions of regret.
A constant
service of "Pilgrim" visits went on through the first half of the decade,
serving, in the main, the smaller communities and scattered knots of a few
people in a given district-the larger centers being well served by their own
elders and did not feel the need of this service now that the fellowship was
well established and each center pursuing its own course in its own fashion.
Between three
and four hundred visits each year were made by Henry Shearn, Ebenezer Housden,
Tom Holmes, Thomas Smedley, and George Ford, travelling between them an
aggregate of nine to fifteen thousand miles in each year. Most years several of
these were able to give full time to this service.
In addition to
the efforts of these brethren there were extended tours throughout the country
undertaken by visiting brethren from abroad, invited for the purpose by the
Committee, and sometimes by one or other of the larger Churches, the itinerary
being arranged to fit the requests from local centers for a visit.
Thus Isaac
Hoskins of USA came-his fourth visit to this country-in 1931. Carl Luttichau of
Denmark, an old friend of the British brethren, in 1933, 1934 and 1937. Paul
Thomson of USA-grandson of the celebrated 19th Century Palestine missionary,
author of "The Land and the Book" -an old-time visitor to the UK, in
1938, and Norman Woodworth of the Dawn Bible Students Association of USA, whose
acquaintance the British brethren made on his first visit in 1937 and renewed
on his second in 1938. And still another old friend, George Van Halewjn of
Holland spent some time in this country in 1933.
These brethren
addressed the national Conventions and visited as many local centers as had
requested a visit and as time permitted.
Some of them
spent as much as six months on tour, at a different group meeting each day or
so, and some less, according to the time at their disposal.
A fairly
drastic change in Committee personnel took place in 1935. Four of the longest
serving members, Henry Shearn, Benjamin Thatcher, William Drinkwater and Thomas
Smedley, felt that it was time to retire and make way for younger men.
They had borne
the "heat and burden of the day" through the building of the
fellowship and its guidance into smoother waters; age was taking its toll and
in consequence they did not allow their names to go forward for election. The
result was virtually a new Committee-only Tom Holmes remained from the old one.
When the
Scrutineers announced the results, it was found that the brethren elected for
the ensuing year were, as hoped by the retiring ones, in the main of younger
years and perhaps giving promise of good service in the years to come-George
Absalom of Beeston, Stephen Couling of Rugby, Andrew Cruikshank of Croxley
Green, Tom Holmes of Nottingham, who retained his former office of Chairman,
Albert Hudson of Welling, who became Secretary in succession of Henry Shearn,
William Morrall of Morecambe, and Cedric Smith of London. So the new Committee
took up its task of serving the British brethren with all the enthusiasm of the
completely inexperienced.
Of course there
were critics who thought that these young hotheads would ruin everything, just
as there were others who thought there was perhaps a case for some younger
blood on the Committee. But the brethren as a whole had spoken by the vote,
choosing these seven out of fifteen names, and no one could argue about that.
And the fellowship survived. The principal regret, up and down the country, was
the departure of Henry Shearn, who had been the guiding star for nineteen
years. More than any man he was responsible for the nation-wide fellowship as
it now existed. The more thoughtful realized that he had been an indefatigable
worker since 1903 and deserved a rest. And the work went on.
The first
problem the new Committee had to deal with was an increasingly insistent demand
for a suitable hymnbook. The traditional hymnbook of the Bible Students was, of
course, "Hymns of Millennial Dawn" published by the old Society. At a
very early stage there emerged a feeling that the continued use of this book
was no longer appropriate, moreover there was the question of obtaining
continuing supplies as time went on. The first overt move was made by the
Forest Gate Church in London, which in 1925 published a new hymnal entitled
"Christian Hymns", containing a large number of the Millennial Dawn
hymns and a few selected additions, 330 hymns in all. The edition was not a
large one and the circulation did not extend very far outside the Forest Gate
Church itself, but it was at least a move in the right direction. Not much else
was done until the 1930s, by which time it was commonly recognized that the
only agent having the financial resources for such a project on a national
scale was the central Committee. Calls from assemblies up and down the country
began to come in and in 1937 the Committee decided to take action. In
accordance with custom the matter was referred to the country at large and
suggestions for the contents of the proposed hymnal invited. The result was a
flood of preferred hymns from all over the country and a considerable time was
required to analyze these and formulate a hymnary which would meet the desires
of all concerned and still be financially practicable. The outcome was a
collection of 462.hymns of which 370 came from the original "Millennial
Dawn" book and "Christian Hymns", and the remaining 92 a choice
selection of other well-known hymns. At the relevant Committee meeting when
alternative titles for the new book were suggested and discussed, universal
acclamation was given to one member’s observation "there is only one
possible title we can give it: ‘Bible Students Hymnal’" The Bible Students
Hymnal, words only edition, well bound in blue cloth boards and gold lettering,
finally saw the light in 1939 and was immediately greeted as fulfilling a
long-felt want.
Virtually every
assembly in the country adopted it and the edition began rapidly to be
depleted. A few copies went abroad but it was not adopted by, nor was it really
intended for, brethren of other lands. It was primarily a British production
for British brethren.
Almost
immediately calls came in for an edition with suitable tunes. The Committee had
foreseen this possibility and ideas were already in shape for a suitable
production. Following precedent, the July 1939 issue of the Monthly announced
that plans were being made, quoting probable cost, and asking for advance
intimation of copies likely to be required. A list was rapidly built up and in
their optimism an appreciable number sent money for their copies. As with other
printed requirements, the war commencing almost immediately thereafter
prohibited the use of necessary paper and the tune book project had to be
abandoned for the duration.
After the war
the project again saw the light. The initiative was taken by what had by then
become known as the "Midland Group", a federation of half-a-dozen
assemblies in the south Midlands centered at Rugby. With the aid of a generous
donation obtained from an interested brother in the United States the book was
prepared and published in 1955. Due to the size and format chosen for the book
it was found when type-setting that there were a number of unavoidable gaps in
the pages; to remedy this defect at the last minute another twenty-seven hymns
were selected and added to the book, thus making the total 489.
This of course created
an anomaly when both books were in use at the same meeting. The original words
only book had run out of print and the need for a reprint existed. The outcome
was the creation of the Bible students Hymnal Trust, comprising a
representative each of the publishers of the original book with elders
representing London, Midlands and North. The result of their labors was the
appearance in 1958 of the second edition of the words only book, similar in
size and style to the first but containing the additional hymns. From that time
onward the UK brethren have enjoyed the use of a very comprehensive selection
of hymns expressing both the essentials of their faith and many other gems of
Christian Hymnology.
This decade
also saw the emergence of a hitherto relatively unknown phenomenon, differences
in doctrinal belief. The certitude of the traditional faith, that the Divine
Plan purposes the eventual elimination of every aspect of evil and its
derivatives, and that the era in which this desirable condition of things is to
be brought about is at the doors, tended to overshadow the detailed discussion
of variant theology. The almost universal devotion to evangelical outreach,
preaching the "Gospel of the Kingdom" to the unconverted, had
occupied the minds of the brethren to the exclusion of other themes. In
consequence the outline of the philosophy of the Atonement, which now became
the point at issue, given in the "Studies in the Scriptures",
supported as it was by Scripture, was accepted and held by virtually everyone
in the fellowship. But with the slowing down of "public witness", of
the outward activities of the faith, there was more time for introspective
discussion of Scripture doctrine and this came to a head in one of the largest
City Churches, that at Forest Gate, with the feeling on the part of some that
the traditional Bible Student views on the Scripture doctrines of the Covenants
and the Sin-Offering were too radical a departure from orthodox Christian
theology and should be questioned. To some in the general national fellowship,
looking on, the difference seemed as largely academic, a matter of words and
terms and angles of view, but others in the church concerned saw in this the
beginning of a partial return to orthodox theology which, having remained unchanged
since the Middle Ages, was considered sadly deficient. And there was always the
fear, so often justified in practice, that the acceptance of one
misapprehension of the Divine Plan would lead to another, and so
"confusion become worse confounded".
The matter was
resolved by a course of action recommended by the Pastor many years previously
for such situations; that the church should form separate communities where
each would follow their own convictions and continue their work with those of
like mind. A "New Covenant" meeting came into existence at Romford
and another to serve the interests of those wishing to adhere to the existing
form of faith in its entirety at Wanstead, known generally as the Aldersbrook
Church, and the remainder continued at Forest Gate.
It was, of
course, for the best. Each Church continued its characteristic work and
flourished reasonably well, all remaining within the general fellowship. The
variant views, at that time anyway, made little impact upon others, except at
Glasgow, where much the same influences became evident with much the same
sequel. The resultant two Glasgow Churches did preserve their essential unity
by joining together in a monthly meeting and on such occasions as a visiting
brother from overseas was present in the city and in this respect did set a
laudable example......And so the decade came to an end with the fellowship
continuing, quieter than it had been in the rather traumatic days of the 1920s,
but convinced still in the integrity of its traditional understanding that it
was living in the closing days of the Age and the days of the unseen Presence
of the Lord at the initial stage of his Second Advent-although this latter was
beginning to be questioned by a few here and there. Some meetings of long standing
were beginning to close down through diminishing numbers but every now and then
a new one would appear and the life of the fellowship seemed destined to
continue without serious interruption.
And then
came the Second World War.
9 CHANGING
VALUES
THE WORLD of
1945 was not the world of 1939. The end of hostilities left changes which could
never be reversed. The experiences of those six years affected everyone, and
only when all was over and some semblance of normal daily life restored was it
possible to pause and take stock of the position. People had been uprooted and
were now remote from their pre-war localities; meetings had been suspended and
in some cases were never resumed. The characteristic work of the movement had
been impeded by restrictions on publishing, on public meetings, on movement, in
common with other Christian groups; the prevailing mood was in the form of one
overriding question: What now?
Nevertheless,
and despite these hindrances, although there was recession in some fields, a
great deal was accomplished in others. The Conventions suffered most; it was
obvious during the war years that large gatherings in city halls under the
threat of air raids were out of the question. The national August London
Convention at Conway Hall was suspended for the duration and so were many of
the usual provincial Conventions. A notable exception was Warrington, where the
Easter Convention was maintained throughout; this served the needs of brethren
in the Midlands and North-West. Dewsbury managed one in 1941, Manchester in
1942 and Birmingham in 1944 and there were a few minor ones at other times. The
smaller local Home-Gatherings, not demanding the use of large halls or the
congregation of relatively large numbers, were able to continue as occasion
offered, although not so many as previously.
Something like
eight or ten in each of the war years are recorded, with attendances of ninety
to a hundred and fifty. With wartime difficulties of travel these were about
the only means of contact between brethren normally residing in country
districts or small towns. The faithful came together on these occasions and
hoped for better times.
The Pilgrim
visits to local centers and isolated individuals had virtually to stop. Wartime
was not time for itinerant ministers of religion to be travelling the country;
there was too much to do at home. It goes without saying that there were no
visits from American friends. 1938 had seen extended tours in this country by
Paul Thomson and Norman Woodworth, something like six months each; there was no
more until 1947 when John T. Read spent six months in the UK.
These
activities were the chief casualties of the war. In the field of
publishing-perhaps the most important aspect-there was, despite the operation
of the Paper Control Order, which severely restricted the amount of paper
allowed for any given publication, a continuous although considerably reduced
output of literature quickly snapped up by brethren anxious to "work while
it is called day". Tract distribution went down to ten per cent of what it
had been in immediately preceding years. As though to make up for this,
however, there was quite an appreciable production of booklets. An outline of
the Divine Plan entitled "The Golden Future", first published in
1939, saw its first edition of 25,000 exhausted in two years and a second of
10,000 during the rest of the war, with a third edition later. Another well
taken up booklet dealing with the subject of the Second Advent, "The
Promise of his Presence" had its first edition in 1939 and its second in
1943.
Other booklets
which saw the light during the war years were "The Beauty of
Holiness", "Parables of the Kingdom", "Jacob’s
Trouble" (dealing with the final experiences of Israel in the Holy Land at
the end of the Age as outlined in the visions of Ezekiel, always in popular
demand and still available in later editions) and a few minor ones. But the
total quantity of such publications issued during the war was pitiably small.
The
impracticability of the customary public lectures during wartime was much upon
the mind of one well-known and popular brother who had been associated with the
public showings of the "Photo-Drama of Creation" in 1914. Bob Darby
conceived the idea that its success during the first war might possibly be
repeated in the second, and he approached the committee with the suggestion.
There was considerable skepticism; it was not known if the films still existed
and could be located, and even if they were and could be obtained whether
public exhibition under wartime conditions would be feasible.
Bob Darby’s
customary enthusiasm, however, was irresistible and it was agreed that the BSC
would attempt to acquire the films via its American contacts provided that Bob
and the few associated with him would undertake responsibility for their use
and exhibition in the United Kingdom.
Initial
progress seemed promising. The films were located and copies of several typical
ones made and sent to the BSC for a start. Bob Darby and his men went into action.
The idea was to limit exhibition of the films, together with an accompanying
short discourse on the Divine Plan in relation thereto, to small public
meetings to which the interested were invited, in small halls where the current
objection to large gatherings of people was not so relevant. The October 1940
issue of the "Monthly" carried a displayed notice of the proposal in
tones calling to remembrance the days of the Photo-Drama thirty years earlier
and this immediately awakened the interest of those who had participated in the
activities of those days. The general title chosen for the effort was "The
Divine Drama of the Ages"; this in itself was sufficient to rouse the
interest of the brethren. Said the announcement, in part: "The Photo-Drama
of Creation is remembered by many as a wonderful stimulus to faith and
activity. brethren who saw these pictures often wish they might see them again;
others, who never saw them, at times express regret that the Photo-Drama is a
thing of the past. As a means of witnessing to others with our message the
Photo-Drama was unrivalled.....now in the fullness of time the Drama films will
(D.V.) again be seen in England. Prayer has been ascending and there has been a
waiting for our Master’s leading. As a first step toward a new "film
witness" the friends will be able to see, on the screen, some of the
pictures which thrilled them in years now past.....It is planned to make the
first films available to any class or group of friends so desiring. If you can
provide a small hall or large meeting-room in your area, write to the office
with your request, and arrangements will be made. There will be no charge, and
the brethren who have this work at heart will provide all apparatus and
operators."
All went well
at the start. The January 1941 "Monthly" gave details of the
arrangements. "The object of this effort" it said "is to
encourage brethren to arrange Biblical film meetings to which personal friends,
neighbors, and others may be invited and see for themselves something of the
Bible message as we understand it.....It is desirable, though not essential,
that a brother be appointed to give a short talk after the film explaining some
of the matters dealt with, although some may prefer to afford the audience an
opportunity for questions instead....."
The first two
films thus made available were two well-remembered ones, "The Raising of
the Shunamite’s Son" and "A royal Prince", this latter
comprising the story; of the early life of Jesus from birth to manhood. The
project seemed to promise success. The decision to confine the exhibitions to
small rooms and limited numbers proved the right one. Gone were the days when
these same films had been shown to thousands in places like the London Opera
House and many came to the Faith in consequence. Said the "Monthly"
for September 1941 "Friends in many parts of the country have now had the
opportunity of seeing the first two films in this series. Large groups and
small, in halls and homes, have been taken back in memory some twenty -five years
or more when first they saw God’s great Plan of the Ages declared in picture
form.....Scotland and Kent, towns in the Midlands and Wales-in short, in every
part of the land, has been visited in turn, but yet there is opportunity for
those who have not had a visit to make request....."
It would seem
that much of the old-time fervor was aroused by these exhibitions. The Easter
1941 Convention at Dewsbury allotted space on its program to the first two
films. Manchester, traditionally always quick to exploit the possibilities of
new ideas, make a special and sustained effort and towards the end of the year
reported to the country at large via the pages of the "Monthly".
"The friends at Manchester have been impressed by the fact that films in
color have their appeal to the public and have proven a successful medium in
presenting Bible themes to interested children and adults.....By leaflet and by
newspaper space, attention had been drawn to the message, and the complete
effort had shown signal signs of response hardly anticipated. With some
diffidence some of the friends had hoped that this modern application of
popular appeal might be found to draw the public, and now faith had eventuated
into practical reality.....The Shunamites’s little son had been instrumental in
bringing together those whose hearts joyously sought in the past to serve the
Lord, and once again refreshed, brethren united in praise to the Lord in happy
service."
At a similar
effort organized by the brethren at Darlington, where the visual display was
accompanied by a short explanatory discourse, one declared that she had learned
more about the Bible that afternoon than in all her life before, and another
that he had learned more than in forty years’ of church going. Incidents like
these only served to increase the confidence of the brethren that a new and
fruitful avenue of witness was opening up perhaps to supplant the now obviously
outdated "public lecture".
Sadly, this was
not to be. The increasing intensity of the war began to render even the limited
scale of the exhibitions increasingly difficult and finally impracticable. The
films themselves, copied from ancient and more or less worn out originals, were
by no means up to modern standards, and when they had been shown once in any one
locality there was no real merit in showing them again. By the middle of 1942
their usefulness was coming to an end and any idea of continuing the effort
lapsed. It had proved an inspiration to the brethren while it lasted and a
number of people were brought into contact with a faith and hope they had not
previously known existed, and that was all.
After the war
everybody went back to the traditional public lecture. Public halls were
becoming available for hire, there were plenty of speakers and plenty of
supporting literature. For the next ten years or so there was a veritable
plethora of such functions all over the country, organized in the main by
individual groups in their own localities or by fusion of such working
together. The most noticeable of these latter was the "North-West Council
of Activity" , of which Fred Musk was the guiding spirit, comprising a
system of joint action by the brethren in Chesire and Lancashire, centered at
Manchester, whereby public meetings were almost constantly in progress in one
town or another. Organized in 1946, this "Council of Activity" was in
operation for some twelve or fourteen years thereafter until the enthusiasts
behind the project had to admit that results were not worth the effort. There
was no fighting against the competition of radio and one hundred and one other
attractions which simply did not exist in the earlier days when one had only to
put up a notice "Bible lecture in this hall" to have a crowded
audience waiting to listen.
The Midlands
brethren, banded together under the title, "the Midland Group"
carried on a similar work on a lesser scale; in the Newcastle to York area the
"North-East Council of Activity" set out in similar fashion but
retired much earlier. South Wales did somewhat better, proportionately, but
again it did not last.
London went in
for fewer but larger meetings but apart from a spectacular one at Conway Hall
in 1947 when one in four of a crowded audience were so interested in what Fred
H. Guard had to say that they left cards asking for further information, not
much happened that endured. It was slowly borne in that the day of public
meetings in Britain was past, and after 1956 they wre generally few and far
between.
1941 witnessed
a rather unique occurrence in the history of the fellowship. A number of
"old-time" brethren who had remained with the original Society when
in 1919 the secession movement was organized now seceded in a body, for reasons
satisfactory to themselves, and became integrated. They were welcomed as
brethren having the same faith and hope, a welcome which to some was somewhat
dimmed by the discovery that during the twenty years’ separation they had
abandoned the characteristic Bible Student view of the Advent, that it
commences with the entry of our Lord into the time and space framework of our
world, imperceptible to human senses but sensed by his own "watching
ones" in consequence of their right understanding of the "signs of
the times", followed by the change of the Church to heavenly conditions,
the breakdown of this present world order, and finally his manifestation to all
the world with his Church and assumption of control and inauguration of the
Millennial Kingdom. This was the vision which had inspired the early Bible
Students and made possible the achievements of what was always called the
"Harvest of the Age". The newcomers had adopted the normal concept of
church theology, that the Advent is to be an instantaneous occurrence,
manifested at once to all men, the "Church" being "caught
up" into the air to meet him, all this being in the future although
imminent.
This view was
by no means new. The Advent has been viewed in these terms since the days of
the Reformation. Based upon a frankly literal reading of the Scriptures, it
suited the mentality of the Fifteenth century and still suits many Christians
to-day, but at this time not many of the brethren expected it to be seriously
argued as an advance upon what had been held since the inception of the
movement as a clearer and more up-to-date understanding of the Divine Plan. But
it was not altogether unknown amongst the brethren at this time. For some years
past, individuals aggregating a small minority had been thinking and talking
along such lines, chiefly within the confines of the Church at Forest Gate,
where it eventually became the majority view, so that in 1939 that Church
announced it as their generally accepted position. One of the two main Glasgow
Churches, know as the "All-sufficient Word Fellowship", followed
suit; apart from this there was little support for the thesis. The irruption of
this new sizeable contingent, holding the same view, tended to make it more
widely known over the country and it began to gain adherents.
Whilst the
comparatively small number involved in this secession, emanating chiefly from
the Manchester and London areas, cannot be compared with the original
separation of 1919- 24, when more than three thousand parted company with their
former associates to form the present fellowship, there was certainly some
repetition of the spirit animating the earlier ones, manifested in a sense of
freedom from domination and a revival of enthusiasm for the work of the Truth.
(Some of the "old stalwarts" were known to remark that they might
have done it twenty years earlier when the original separation was in progress
instead of lending their support to a system which now they were driven to
repudiate, but this was really more in the nature of friendly banter than of
adverse criticism. Twenty years or no twenty years, ties of friendship and
fellowship which had been broken were now restored.) That sense of freedom and
renewed fervor found its outlet in a fairly small gathering held at Queens
Square, London, November 22-23, 1941, to which the brethren generally were
invited, and the outcome of this was a kind of manifesto addressed to the
brethren generally which was published in full in the "Bible Study
Monthly" for January 1942. Its terms were reminiscent of the very similar
statement issued in 1919 when the entire country was involved in a similar but
much more extensive re-alignment of loyalties. "It was evident" said
the report prepared by the organizers "that those gathered at this
convention realized the time was ripe when all the Lord’s consecrated, having
the same hopes and faith, should seek to gather together more and work together
in whatever the Lord may have for his people to do.....A statement was prepared
addressed to brethren generally and this ran in part "The brethren
gathered at this convention in London on Saturday and Sunday, November 22/23,
1941, being of those who find themselves separated from their first
association.....
send love and
greetings to all their brethren in Christ.
This assembly
believes that the Body of Christ cannot be divided.....We, therefore, your brethren
in London on this occasion, deploring all schism and loss of fellowship in
spirit and in work, invite your prayerful attention to this matter.....and we,
therefore, invite suggestions from all those of like precious faith who desire
to know and do his Will". This, of course, addressed to those who for
twenty years past had been doing just that, could be construed as preaching to
the converted; but the exhortation was received in the spirit in which it was
presented and the newcomers must have felt that they were completely
integrated.
A periodic
journal, "Maranatha" ("The Lord Cometh"), was commenced in
1952, devoted exclusively to matters connected with this understanding of the Advent,
and continued for thirty-six years, during this time acquiring an increasing
circle of interested readers and forming a link between brethren who looked
upon the Advent as a future event and so were avowedly "looking for his
appearing". As an extension of the particular thesis there was commenced
in 1950 an annual one-week "Maranatha" conference at which the
speakers were expected to specialize on the same general theme. Held during the
first few years at the Rosehill Conference Center at Reading, it transferred
later to the more commodious High Leigh Conference Center at Hoddesdon, Herts,
being discontinued in 1980 due to diminishing attendance. The fact that this
annual conference represented a view variant to what had always been regarded
as one of the fundamental features of the faith did not prevent brethren of
both schools of thought from attending the conference and in fact it turned out
to be about the most popular and pleasant "get together" of the later
years.
During the
latter stages of the war a situation was developing which resulted in a
fundamental change in the central organization. The elective basis of the
central committee meant that its seven members were drawn from every part of
the country and the frequent committee meetings-usually monthly-required that
they had to travel long distances every four or five weeks at week-ends. Since
they, as a rule, were engaged in employment or business, the only practicable
day for such meetings was Sunday. Prior to the war this presented no travel
difficulties. The rail ways offered an excellent service of Sunday excursions
between towns at reasonable rates and it was possible for committee members to
leave their homes at five or six o’clock in the morning and be at the
rendezvous by eleven.
Return trains
were available at about six and those with the longest journeys would be home
by midnight. (Car travel, was, of course, rather unusual in those days and the
usual method of travel was by train.) It meant personal sacrifice and devotion
to the Cause to mortgage one Sunday in four to this proceeding but all who
accepted nomination for election were happy thus to assume the obligation. Up
to the time of the Second World War the system worked perfectly well. But the
war changed it. Cheap travel facilities were withdrawn, train services reduced
with consequent overcrowding, sundry obligations at home or in the home
district rendered the monthly trek increasingly difficult, and the work of the
committee began to devolve more and more upon the shoulders of such members as
lived in the London area and could get together more easily. It began to be
obvious that some kind of a change would have to be made.
Matters came to
a head at the July election in 1940. Of the seventeen names nominated by
assemblies all over the country only seven felt able to stand for election.
Faced with this position, which had never happened before, the Election
Scrutineers declared these seven elected, but gave the voting brethren an
opportunity to dissent or offer alternative suggestions. None did so, and the
seven took office.
A special
leaflet had been printed and sent to the secretaries of all meetings and to all
known brethren in the country in the following terms: "A situation without
precedent has arisen in connection with this year’s election. For the first
time since the Committee’s inception in 1919, seven brethren only, of the
seventeen names nominated by the classes, are prepared to stand for election.
Under these
circumstances there is no choice to put to the friends for voting, and
according to the Constitution of the Committee, these seven brethren properly
take up the duties involved.
"It is
felt , however, that the peculiar circumstances of the case render it
appropriate that the friends generally be given an opportunity of expressing
their approval of the situation or expressing their alternative preference.
Since the entire control of the Committee and its activities is vested in the
brethren of this country, we feel that the present situation may be a means of
their realizing afresh the responsibilities involved, and that the friends will
willingly take their part in the direction of those activities amongst us which
are of joint concern.
"In the
case of those nominated to stand for election, it is realized that the
complexities of the present political situation, longer hours of work, and so
on, make it more than ever difficult to give time to the duties which devolve
upon Committee members.....In these circumstances, therefore, we do ask all
brethren everywhere to either indicated their agreement that: (a) The seven
brethren at present in office should continue so until the next election in
July 1941, or alternatively.(b) Offer a suggestion as to what other course
should be adopted.
"It is the
duty of the Election Scrutineers to see that the wishes of the brethren are
carried out, and should there be a definite desire for some change in the
present arrangements, occasion will be taken to obtain the voice of the
brethren throughout the country.....Please send your reply by September 30,
1940, to the Election Scrutineer, Bro. G. Absalom....."
Came election
time in 1941 with the war continuing and this time only seven names were
nominated and five of these already serving. When in 1942 the same thing happened
it began to look as though the brethren generally felt that the needs in
wartime were best served by a permanent committee, and this, on a dispassionate
view of the situation made good sense. With Government controls and all kinds
of restrictions affecting the work of the brethren, a considerable amount of
contact with various official bodies had become obligatory and this in turn
required experience and a measure of continuity which could not be attained
with an annually changing personnel. The position was accepted and the, by now,
more or less permanent committee soldiered on.
But not without
thought and discussion. Did this recurring frustration of the normal elective
process indicate a leading to some modification of the traditional
organization? No one knew how much longer the war was going to last nor yet
what kind of social order would follow its termination. The outcome of this
thought and discussion, after taking into consideration such suggestions as did
come in from interested brethren, was the institution of a national referendum
asking for guidance and decision on these alternatives. The ballot paper, dated
1st August, 1942, after referring to the matters at issue, said, in part:
".....The Committee has had the subject under discussion during the year
just past, feeling that the position is not altogether satisfactory, and would
now like to proffer a further opportunity for interested friends to exercise a
vote.....There are two immediate practical alternatives; one, that the existing
Committee remains in office for another twelve months, to be subject to
re-election at the expiry of that time, and the other, that a new election be
held at once.
"There is
a third alternative which may appeal to some, that the Committee shall be
re-organized upon a basis especially devised to meet the needs of to-day. Those
who feel that an entirely new charter ought to be drawn up to replace the 1919
Constitution may vote for the third alternative, with the understanding that in
this case the existing committee remains in office while the new charter is
prepared and voted upon. In the event of the third alternative heading the
poll, the friends will be called upon to submit their proposals for the new
charter." The result of this ballot, announced in the November 1942
"Monthly", ran: "Result of the postal ballot.
The Election
Scrutineer, Bro. G. Absalom, has made his report, which shows a heavy majority
in favor of Alternative 1, viz., that the present committee remain in office
until July 1943. This alternative was carried by a majority of 77.6% "The
second alternative, that a committee election be held immediately, polled only
3.4% of votes, and the third alternative, that a new charter defining the
committee’s activities be prepared and voted upon, commanded 19.9% votes
"The number of brethren who voted is greater than has been the case at any
time since 1937."
With this 80%
mandate to preserve the status quo there was no option to do other than carry
on, and this was the accepted position until the end of the war. Only in 1945,
when the end was in sight, did the matter surface again. There had been
considerable discussion and the bandying to and fro of the apparently most
fitting arrangement for the necessary services during those past two years and
now that the time had come to make a decision it was evident that general
thought was in the direction of a permanent center for the production and
distribution of literature and the publication of the monthly magazine, leaving
the individual churches to go their own way with their own resources. Some of
the old activities needing the aid of a central body, such as public witness
efforts, conventions and the like, were well within the abilities of the local
city and other churches, and a certain spirit of independence was rife in the
community which tended to foster local rather than community effort. It was
also recognized, and expressed, that much of the work for which the committee
had been organized at the first now needed knowledge and experience of Government
regulations which had not been the case previously, and would be operating for
a good many years yet, and in the publishing field a knowledge yielded by
experience of printing and publishing matters. It was evident that sentiments
were tending toward the third alternative of the last poll taken in 1942 and
that any new charter would be in the direction of a permanent body responsible
for these matters.
Following
consultation with various interested brethren, a proposition on these lines was
put before the brethren toward the end of 1945 the effect of which was to
separate the administration of the Benevolent Fund from the main work of the
committee, George Ford to undertake this work. The remainder of the committee’s
functions, which now only need cover the printing and publishing field, to be
concentrated on a permanent basis in South-East London where a community
existed able to keep the work going. Several members of the committee who had
held on during the war years were desirous of retiring once satisfactory
arrangements could be made.
Put to the
national poll, the issue was not in doubt. The two Scrutineers, G. Absalom and
A. G. Reid, of the Nottingham church, reported 90% in favor and 10% against.
The revision of arrangements evidently had general approval and in fact the
life of the movement continued without perceptible change.
So the brethren
set out in 1946 in reasonable good heart. The organization for the production
of literature and for keeping everyone in touch with everyone else was still
there and functioning, and the country as a whole continued to use it.
There was still
the call for printed matter, leaflets and booklets wherewith the message of the
Kingdom might immediately be proclaimed as in the days of yore. During the next
eight years nearly a million four or six-page leaflets were printed, mainly by
the center and in part by various city groups such as Forest Gate, Glasgow,
Aldersbrook, Manchester, the Midlands, Darlington, and so on. In 1948 the
London center commenced the issue of a large four-page illustrated
newspaper-size publication entitled "Millennial Message" containing
various aspects of the general theme presented as "news items" and
this was promptly taken up in many quarters and distributed all over the country.
In the four years it continued-cost dictated its eventual demise-a quarter of a
million copies were put out. Over the ten years 1946-1956 ten new booklets were
published dealing with various aspects of the Divine Plan, of which the most
popular were "God’s Fulfilling Purpose" and "A Glimpse of God’s
Plans" these, together with the old standard favorites "The Plan of
God in Brief" and "The Golden Future" were going out at the rate
of seven to ten thousand a year during this period. In addition a new edition
of the old booklet "The Promise of His Presence" was produced to
reaffirm the basis of the traditional Advent belief.
The "Plan
of God in Brief" was translated into Swedish by the brethren there in
1948, and into Hebrew in 1953 by some friendly American brethren, and widely
used in their relevant spheres. (A copy of the Hebrew version was sent to every
Rabbi in the UK for their interest, without pressing or expecting conversions.)
In addition to all this activity the work of the USA Dawn Bible Students
Association began to make its impact in UK. The Dawn, a later secession, was
born in 1930 and its introduction to the UK was brought about by the committee
invitation in 1937 for Norman Woodworth, its then head, to visit this country
for an extended tour and to get acquainted. From that time on close relations
were maintained. In 1946 the Dawn thought it proper to establish a definite
branch depot in this country to store and distribute their characteristic
literature among the brethren and this, from that time onward, has been
available to the British brethren to the extent they desire.
Keen as the
brethren were to get back to the work of evangelism, there was another matter
of some importance—the restoration of contact with brethren on the European
continent from whom the UK brethren had been separated by war. Virtually no
news of their welfare had been received since the war commenced and there was
concern as to their position. Just one letter got through to America in 1942
from an old friend, Carl Luttichau of Denmark, in which he assured all of his
welfare, "considering".
"I myself,
and the friends I have the privilege to serve, are faring very well" he
said. "We have freedom to gather round the Bible and even to meet at
little Sunday conventions.....We have full freedom to send out our little paper
in this country. At Christmas time I had the privilege of visiting friends in
Stockholm, Sweden.....I am still able to travel round the country and meet with
little groups."
Contact was
speedily made with Denmark and the Scandinavian countries, with Holland,
Belgium and Germany. Some had survived, some had not. A well-known visitor to
this country, George Van Halewjn of Rotterdam, was among the survivors and
together with Carl Luttichau was later to make further visits to the UK. What
was now of more importance, however, was the plight of the German brethren.
Together with all their compatriots they were suffering, acutely, the
aftermath. With a view to seeing what could be done, Harry Nadal of the Aldersbrook
church, London, undertook two visits to Germany in 1948. He had already been
active for a considerable time organizing the sending of food and clothing and
now he was to see for himself how matters stood. Crossing first to Holland he
made immediate contact with Jacques Alblas and George Van Halewjn, well known
from previous years, and then to Stuttgart, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover and
other places, renewing acquaintance with the brethren at each place, and
ascertaining needs still unfulfilled. A heartening aspect was the ready
co-operation of the British Military Control in Germany; the outcome of the
trip was very fruitful and enabled the more effective organization of relief.
By 1951 George
Jennings and Will Fox undertook a further trip to observe progress and current
needs, meeting with warm hospitality wherever they went. In this same year the
work still being handled by Harry Nadal was extended to South America, where
much distress existed among the brethren there.
By 1957 the
need was disappearing; Germany was getting on her feet again. In that year
Harry Nadal and Tom Allen made another visit which this time was more in the
nature of a ‘pilgrim trip’, visiting many of the groups which had been
organized at Kirchlengern. Some twenty-four groups in towns all over Germany
were visited; thus contact with the German brethren continued into succeeding
years.
Visits of USA
brethren continued. 1947 saw John T. Read tour the country, making 99 visits to
local meetings and 1948 saw him here again, this time only 47 but also a visit
to Denmark to serve the brethren there. Our old friend Carl Luttichau came from
that country and restored contact broken by the war-sadly, this was his last
visit; he passed away in 1955. 1950 was marked by a short trip by Brother
Trippler of Germany and a longer one by Russell Pollock of USA, representing
the Dawn. Each year to 1960 after that had its visitor, traversing the country
and ministering at the meetings, Norman Woodworth in 1951, George Van Halewjn
of Holland in 1952, Percy Read, John T.
Read, Paul
Thomson, Will Siekman, and others. The trips tended to get shorter as the
number of meetings available to receive them diminished; the spirit remained
the same.
So it was with
the conventions. Attendances were decreasing, not because of failing interest
but because of the "passing on" of the "old stalwarts".
Each year saw the three traditional main gatherings, Easter at Warrington,
Midlands at Whitsun, August at Conway Hall, London. In the North, Glasgow,
usually at Easter. Lesser ones were held at other weekends at centers such as
Manchester and Cardiff. A new venue for an annual Whitsun gathering opened up
in 1950 at Portrush, Northern Ireland, where unique facilities existed, and
this continued until 1980, when those facilities ceased to exist.
By now there
was a teenage postwar generation beginning to assert itself. Knowing little of
the movement’s pre- 1st war history it was only to be expected that they would
wish to strike out on their own. A "Young Bible Students Circle" came
into operation in 1948 with the ostensible object of making progress in the
knowledge of the faith and work of the community. There was great enthusiasm
for a while, the organizing of "Young Bible Students" conventions and
other joint activities, some attempts at open-air preaching and other methods
aimed at proclaiming the good news, long since found relatively ineffective by
the older ones-but each generation has to find these things out for itself.
After about fifteen years the erstwhile Young Bible Students were that much
older and had settled into the ordinary framework of the community and their
successors did not seem to have the same degree of zest for this kind of effort
so that not so much was heard of it later on. It served to direct and shape the
Christian lives of those who initiated it and that perhaps was the reason for
its emergence.
1951 saw a
change in the name of the journal, which through all the ups and downs of Bible
Student history had consistently maintained publication. From "Bible
Students Monthly" it became "Bible Study Monthly" and the
reason, as given in an explanatory notice, was that the old Society had begun
to resume use of the term "Bible Students" in its own work and this
was leading to confusion in the minds of readers and others. For much the same
reason, and following this lead, many of the groups began terming themselves
"Bible Fellowship" preceded by the name of their town. Leicester in
1946 was the first to adopt the term and they were followed from time to time
by others so that in the provinces the name has become more or less universal.
By now many of
the original workers to whom so much was owed, stemming from the 1910 to 1920
period, were being called to higher service. Henry Shearn, architect of the
secession, in 1946; "Father" Guard, of Forest Gate, 1947; Don McLeod
of Swansea, 1948; Ben Thatcher of Leicester and Sidney Smith of Manchester,
1949; Morton Edgar of Glasgow, 1950; William McNerlen of Sheffield, 1953; W.
Reid Sharp of Newcastle, 1956; John Melville of Barrow and William Crawford,
1957.
These all
"finished their course with joy" and their loss made a difference.
And now,
towards the end of this period, a certain amount of heart-searching was going
on among the more serious minded of the older brethren. There was no doubt that
progress in the movement was slowing down. The younger generation, in the main,
was not following altogether in the way of their fathers, and in some quarters
this was causing concern. The fact that the same phenomenon has been true of
every generation since the dawn of history was not fully appreciated by many,
and those who did appreciate it were not sure what they could do about it.
What was it in
the fellowship, its activity, its theology, its demands, which was failing to
induce the young to take part in the life of the community as whole-heartedly
as had their forebears? How was it that the message of the present Lord and the
coming Age of blessing failed to evoke that same rapturous acceptance that it
had done in the earlier years of the century? A few years later the answers
became apparent; at present they were but questions. And in the meantime the
older ones were passing off the scene, increasingly quickly.
This concern
resulted in a series of several meetings in London of leading brethren to
consider the position. Here, perhaps for the first time, it was felt, and
expressed, by some that the development was inevitable. Every generation has to
find its own way for itself and if it has the good sense to profit by the works
of its predecessors, well and good; "other men labored, and ye are entered
into their labors". But if not, it finds the way by experience and no one
generation can be expected to follow precisely the previous one. The Bible
Student faith itself was the result of a younger generation on sixty years ago
building upon the earlier foundation of 19th century Advent expectation and
transforming it into something new. Who knows what might yet be expected of the
present one?.The outcome of all this was the institution of a monthly meeting
at Caxton Hall, London, where young and old could come together for mutual
consideration of matters of faith and belief; this became a gathering where attendants
from the various London groups and the surrounding areas could come together
for what amounted to a series of mini-conventions. A good many found common
ground in these meetings, which commenced in 1950 and were not discontinued
until 1956. Diminishing attendances dictated the discontinuance and these were
consequent upon a factor which was becoming increasingly noticeable, the onset
of old age. It was beginning to be realized that the pronounced increase in
membership of the brethren in the halcyon days of 1910-20, in the days of the
"Harvest", was now, forty years later, going to be reflected in the
consequent departure from this earthly scene of so many of those who had
embraced the faith in their thirties and forties, and now were in their
seventies and eighties.
And in 1956
there had to be serious consideration of prospects for the future and
particularly in what way the message of the Truth could most effectively be
proclaimed to the contemporary generation.
Members of Bible
Students Committee 1919-1945
Secretary
1919
Shearn Crawford Edgell Tharatt Seager Guard, Sr. Guy
1920
" " " " " " "
1921
" " " Housdon " " " 1922 " " "
" " " " 1923 " " " " McNerlen Brett
Palmer 1924 " " Thatcher " " " " 1925 "
Jacobs " " " " " 1926 " Hillary " "
" Wileman Morrall 1927 " Holmes " " " Humphrey "
1928 ": " " " " " " 1929 " "
" " Morrall Court Smedley 1930 " Morrall " Drinkwater
McNerlen " " 1931 " Holmes " " " " "
1932 " " " " " " " 1933 " " "
" " " " 1034 " " " " Ford " "
1935 " " " " " " " 1936 Hudson " Absalom
Smith Cruikshank Couling Morrall 1937 " " " " Wenborn
" Guy 1938 " " " " " " " 1939 "
" Ward " Batcheller Osborne Boyce 1940 " " " Hall Ford
" Sears 1941 " " " " " Rew Allbon 1942 "
" " " " " " 1943 " " " "
" " " 1944 " " " " " " " 1945
" " " " " " ".....
10 VISTA OF
JORDAN
INDICATIONS OF
change began in 1960. so far as the brethren in general were concerned, the
situation was unaltered. Local fellowships carried on their church life,
services of worship, conventions and the like. Literature was in plentiful
supply from the London center, and a certain amount of desultory tract
distribution went on. but something of the old fire was lacking.
The zeal which
had fuelled the public meetings and the witnessing work of past years was
evaporating; the "old stalwarts" who had borne the heat and burden of
the day were still as stalwart but considerably older, and natural powers were
fading. The later members and the younger generation, which had never known the
fervor of the old sense of mission to proclaim the imminence of the end of the
Age and the coming of the Millennial world, growing up in a materialistic Age
in which these things were as idle fancies, were more concerned with the
practice of the faith in their own fellowships. There was evident in many of
the meetings a partial return to the old Christian tradition stressing the
holiness of Jesus and emphasis on his death at the expense of the magnitude of
his coming work for man in the power of his resurrection. The degree to which
this became true varied as between one fellowship and another; there were
those, mainly where the elderly were predominant, where something much more
like the old standards prevailed. The zeal was there, and the certainty, but
the onset of old age had sapped the essential vigor to act, and changing social
conditions closed the doors which once had always stood open. The fires burned
low, not because of loss of faith and belief, but of physical strength and
outward opportunity.
So the older
ones began to pass off the scene, familiar faces were disappearing, and there
were not so many younger ones ready to take their place. This position became
more noticeable after 1960. It was more fully realized by then that the
tremendous increase in membership over the period 1910-20, consequent upon the
results of the Albert Hall and other national campaigns of 1910, and the
Photo-Drama exhibitions of 1914, was now to have its repercussions. A great
many who then were young in years-and the movement at that time was essentially
one of young people, largely in their twenties and thirties-meant that an
equivalent number was now at the end of the way, In the ordinary; way one would
expect such losses to be made up by new and younger adherents, but this has not
been the lot of any Christian denomination for many years and the Bible
Students have been no exception. By 1970 some 80% of the brethren who took part
in the 1919 secession had passed on and by 1980 most of the rest had followed.
By this latter year the fellowship consisted for the most part-by far the most
part-of newly-joined members and the children-and grandchildren-of the original
founders. But the newcomers did not make up the number of their predecessors
and the scale of things lessened.
Among some of
those most deeply concerned light began to dawn. Certain words of the writer of
the book of Ecclesiastes came to mind; "say not thou, what is the reason
that the former days were better than these, for thou dost not enquire wisely
concerning this". The former world, the world of well-attended public
meetings, of wholesale tract distribution, of mass evangelism, with hundreds
and even thousands coming together to hear the message of "Present
Truth", had passed away, and it was not going to return. The day of
organized Bible Student churches in the cities, where the worshippers were
numbered in the hundreds, and numerous lesser fellowships in the towns and
villages, was ended. Those that remained were as convinced and confident as
ever, but they were lesser in number, and smaller in size, and quieter in
outward activity. The number of the faithful in 1970 was 60% of what it had
been in 1930, and the number of regular meetings 50%. One might be forgiven for
wondering if in fact the Harvest was ended, the message given, the work done, and
the entire fabric of service and worship that had been built up over seventy
years now doomed to enter that category outlined by the writer to the Hebrews
in the words "that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish
away".
It was not so to
be. This train of thought led inevitably to the reflection that right at the
beginning, when Charles Russell commenced his monumental work, he had no idea
of creating a new denomination or fellowship, but rather of circulating his
message among Christians of all existing denominations, or of none. It was the
wide-spread impact of his preaching and writing which led later to the
emergence of the distinctive fellowship which became known as the Bible
Students . And now the question came to the top: Are we intended to go back to
the beginning and turn our efforts to the systematic introduction of the
message to individuals without thought of bringing them into another fold? Is
it to be an example of the parable spoken by Jesus and recorded in the Gospel
or Mark, "so is the kingdom of God, as if a man should cast seed into the
ground, .....and the seed should spring and grow up, he knoweth not how"?
Could there be a method of making known the message among those most likely to
receive it more fitted to the present-day world than the old now largely
ineffective ones?
Thought
naturally turned to the one element in the British brethren’s
"stock-in-trade" which had survived the vicissitudes of the two
post-war eras, the "Bible Study Monthly". During the whole period,
from its foundation in 1924, while other aids to service and worship, and the
number of the brethren, had first increased and then commenced to decline, the
circulation and influence of the "Monthly" had been steadily rising.
From its modest beginning in 1924, when it was founded to serve the interests
of the British brethren who had seceded from the old Society, it had expanded
its scope to cover all the English-speaking countries and to some extent areas
such as the European continent, South America and the Far East. But always it
had gone to the brethren; there was no thought of extending its circulation
outside the fellowship. Now came the question: could this medium be used to
reach inquiring Christians and non-Christians alike, outside that circle? At
the very least, notices in periodical journals, particularly those read by
Christian people, might conceivably yield results.
The scheme
commenced in 1956. Announcements in selected British journals appeared and were
quickly followed by requests from enquirers. The results rather surpassed
expectations. Within four years the circulation had doubled and before long it
was four-fold. some who became readers then are readers still and manifest real
appreciation. A goodly number-about one in seven in the UK-are ordained
ministers of almost every denomination, including some Anglican canons, one or
two Bishops, the Moderator of a Nonconformist communion, the Heads of several
theological colleges, quite a host of men who by means of correspondence
indicate their interest in, and oft-times concurrence with, the outlook on the
Divine Plan presented.
Several
evangelical churches display copies each month on their bookstalls for the use
of their members. Many public libraries place the "Monthly" on their
readers’ table. In quite a number of ways the "Monthly" now goes
where the tracts and the public speakers went in times gone by. In later years
both the "Dawn" and "Maranatha" magazines, encouraged
doubtless by this example, followed suit and also had encouraging results.
Of the many
appreciations which constantly come in from ministers of religion the
following, severely abbreviated, will yield some idea of the type of response:
"A wonderful collection. Has helped me much in my ministry both in my
parish work and my evangelical work" -"Most helpful as a lay preacher
in the Salvation Army" -"A good help when preparing my sermons"
-"Helpful material which I am able to use in my ministry"
-"Fine, fundamental subjects which are true to the Word of God"
-"Many of the points you mention are to be found later in my sermons"
-"So Scriptural, so devotional, and very helpful indeed; they are of great
value" -"In these days of modernism and complacency extremely
refreshing to find articles of such value and conviction"_ "Very
stimulating, building me up in the faith" -"Of immense spiritual
value and profit" -"A lamp to illuminate many of the dark passages of
the Word of God" -"Extremely interested in "The Coming of the
King"; profoundly needed in this generation of the End Time; very sorry it
is preached about so little in most churches: -"The ‘Coming of the King’
has helped me to understand the Second Advent better".
These have come
from ministers. There are, of course, similar observations from laymen readers
who range or have ranged from a member of the House of Lords to some
unfortunates serving prison sentences.
The logical
inference to be drawn from all this is that a field of service is opening up in
these more recent times which does not involve making converts to the
Fellowship and enlisting them as fellow-workers, but rather to act as did
Brothers Sunderlin and Bender a century ago, scatter the seed and leave it to
germinate in its own way. Whether it will, as it did then, eventually fructify
into a coming together on the part of some to study these things for themselves
and proclaim it in turn no man can say; this has in fact happened in a number
of cases where group meetings have been started under the aegis of the members’
own denominational church to discuss these themes between themselves. But it
has to be remembered that the Christian witness given with failing powers as
the Age nears its end is to be overtaken by the emergence of the Divine Kingdom
of Christ in which the Gospel will be proclaimed in power infinitely superior
to the best that can be done in this present, and perhaps that is to be the
real outcome of the present situation.
A certain
amount of publishing continued. Between 1955 and 1965 sixteen new booklets were
published and another twenty during the following decade. The quantities
printed were considerably smaller than had been the case in former years but
then there were not so many brethren to make use of them.
Altogether the
publishing center had issued fifty-eight different booklets since 1939. Then in
1975 came a more ambitious effort in this field.
It had long
been felt in some British circles that there was one notable omission in the
published works of Charles Russell.
Although the
doctrine of Future Probation was inherent in his understanding of the Divine
Plan, and often referred to in his writings, there was no formal and detailed
treatise on the subject as had been with such matters as the Second Advent, the
doctrine of Hell, and so on. It was resolved to remedy this deficiency and to
make this the basis of another evangelical effort. The result was the
publication in 1975 of "Future Probation in Christian Belief", a
100-page book setting out the Biblical basis for the thesis with not only the
work of Pastor Russell but also the supporting views of eminent 19th and 20th
century churchmen and others on the subject, forming an up-to-date analysis of
present-day thought on the subject. Theologians like Dr R. H.
Charles
(Anglican) and Dr W. B. Pope (Methodist), eminent ministers of the caliber of
F.W. Farrar, F.B. Meyer, Dr J.
Paterson Smyth,
Dr. Vranken Holmes of USA, gave their testimony. Very little affirmative
treatment of the subject had appeared since the days of Archdeacon Farrar of
Westminster.Abbey in the late 19th century and it was felt that a powerful
witness to the Truth could be given by this book.
A first edition
of twenty thousand copies was printed. As a first step copies were sent to a
large number of ministers of all denominations in UK with an explanatory leaflet.
At the same time the British public library system was approached and as many
libraries as would accept copies were supplied with same for their shelves. In
later years an appreciable number of enquiries were received from readers who
had picked up the book from their local library; this source of interest still
continues.
A great many
ministers were favorable impressed. One surprise was the discovery that quite a
few of them already had Pastor Russell’s "Studies in the Scriptures" on
their bookshelves and intimated how highly they thought of them. The
"spade work" of past generations of brethren in the
"Harvest" must have had greater impact than they knew. One C of E
Canon was so impressed by the implications of the book that he called a
conference of all the ministers in his area to discuss the subject after
obtaining sufficient copies to present them with one each. A Methodist minister
in a seaside town called a meeting of all the ministers in his town with a
similar purpose. The circulation of the book has continued through the years
and its wider use is only limited by lack of man-power.
A final flicker
in the realm of public meetings came in 1986 when a few brethren in the
North-East endeavored to revive the old interest in film presentations. A
modern cinerama of still pictures with sound accompaniment entitled "For
This Cause" had been produced by the "Dawn" brethren in USA and
had evoked considerable interest over there. Would it be equally effective in the
UK, was the question. Putting it to the test, a hall was taken in York and the
function well advertised. A fair number of people attended and what seemed to
be a reasonable harvest of inquiries resulted. In the long-term outcome there
were a few permanent readers of the "Monthly" and that was about all.
Further showings at Oxford and Yeovil elicited a flicker of interest but after
that there was nothing.
The number of
conventions, and their attendances, began perceptibly to diminish. The old
regulars, Warrington and Glasgow at Easter, Leicester at Whitsun, London at
August, remained, albeit on a smaller scale than of yore. Speakers began to
comment on the increasing number of gray heads in their audiences. The last
Conway Hall convention was held in 1969; after that, decreasing attendance and
growing lack of brethren able to undertake the ancillary duties and services
contingent on an organized convention dictated a change to smaller venues and
so succeeding gatherings for London were held, first at Langley for a few years
and then at the present venue at Chesham. By 1971 Blaby in Leicestershire had
become the permanent home.for the traditional Midlands Whitsun gathering, again
with reduced numbers. The annual "Maranatha" week-long conference,
which had commenced in 1950, closed its doors in 1980, for the usual reason,
although on the other side of the coin a series of five-day gatherings in
Yeovil, the "Patmos" convention, endured from 1978 to 1987. Dublin
held just one fairly modest convention in 1976 but this was not repeated, and
Lancashire friends organized a five-day function at Southport in 1986. It was
evident, though, that the days of sixty years past when six or eight hundred
brethren came together for a three or four-day session of exhortation,
exposition, and fellowship, were no more.
Against this
perhaps rather somber background there must be set the emergence of one or two
periodic functions associated with the younger fraternity. These are set in the
Midlands where there is a greater aggregation of such. From the later 1960s and
into the present there has been a regular week-long Easter get-together,
intended mainly for the young, but open to all, at Purley Chase Conference
Center, near Nuneaton. The nature of the sessions and the subjects dealt with
are those more likely to interest the younger element in the fellowship as are
the recreational side-lines so often associated with this kind of function in
most Christian groups. Whilst not suiting the tastes of some of the older
brethren it must have its place in the Master’s scheme of things.
The organized
Pilgrim service continued to find its place, perhaps a little quieter than in
the past. A number of old friends came from USA by invitation and fulfilled
itineraries, planned usually by the London center, visiting local meetings all
over the country. Thus Paul Thomson came in 1958, renewing old acquaintances in
forty-two towns. The same year came Will Siekman for a shorter period. 1960 saw
Fred Essler on his first visit to this country where he traveled the whole
territory from Cardiff to Ipswich and Portsmouth to Dewsbury. He was followed
by Percy Read, the new secretary of the USA. Pastoral Bible Institute, who in
1962 covered the area from Glasgow to Bexhill and Cardiff to Ipswich with some
visits to Ireland including Dublin, Belfast and Londonderry . Alex Muir set
foot in this country on his first pilgrim visit in 1962, where after a mix-up
at London airport on his arrival where, after advice of his arrival on,
successively, two separate planes arriving within a few hours of each other,
two unsuccessful trips from the London suburbs to meet him, several
Transatlantic telephone calls on the part of the airport authorities to find
out where he really was, he was eventually discovered waiting patiently in an
arrival lounge, having been there all the time. Despite this apparently
inauspicious start, he covered the entire country from the South Coast at
Paignton, Bournemouth and Eastbourne through Lon-don and the Midlands to
Glasgow and home. This era of organized USA visits was closed by Fred Essler
and Alex Muir in 1967 and 1968 respectively with similar travels through the
entire country.
From this time
onward the tendency was for local groups to make their own arrangements for
this kind of service, usually on a small scale involving a relatively small
number of visits in a particular area, sometimes inviting a USA or Canadian
brother but more often utilizing the services of a British brother. The
services of the London center ceased to be necessary or desired in this field
of service; in any case it largely died out in later years.
The
ever-extending arms of the Welfare State, it had long been thought, would
eventually render the Benevolent Fund Service unnecessary and redundant. This,
however, did not prove to be the case. Founded in 1919 twenty-five years before
the Welfare State was thought of, 1967 found it still actively operating with
contributed funds and meeting a need. It had been under the personal
supervision of George Ford, who had looked after its fortunes since 1946, ; but
by 1968 George was feeling the weight of years and decided it was time for a
change. Consultation with the former administrators resulted in an invitation
to three younger brethren who readily accepted the duties involved. This committee,
with occasional changes., has continued to the present. Despite the existence
and amenities of the Welfare State, this committee has found that the Lord’s
words on one occasion "the poor ye always have with you" are still,
sadly, only too true, and the twin facts that the need still exists and the
funds still continue to come in hearten them to continue in the work as of
yore. Whilst it had been true that most of the larger city churches, when they
were large, had maintained benevolent funds of their own for their own members
there was always a wide spectrum, of need among isolated brethren and small
communities in various parts of the country and while the contributions to the
fund continued, and continue, to come in, that need was and is being met.
Concern for
those in need was also manifested in the province of impecunious old age. In
earlier days, before the advent of the Welfare State, in 1946, there was, in
the case of extreme and impotent old age without means or relatives, no
alternative to the old-time Victorian workhouse, where the hapless inmates
could do little but sit and wait to die. Within the circle of the independent
fellowship the solution was often found by brethren of younger years and
possessed of the necessary facilities taking such older ones into their own
homes and caring for them in their last years. By the 1930s the average age of
the brethren was rising into the later years and this practice was becoming
less feasible. Some desultory discussion on what could be done was beginning to
be instituted but the pace of this was too slow for one energetic sister who
eventually sailed into action on her own account.
Rose Bush was
an ex-matron of a large London hospital, now in the early thirties retired from
the cares of that position. Rose Bush was a rather formidable and decisive
character with some sense of humor and a heart of gold. The thought of brothers
and sisters in the faith who had labored for the Cause in their own younger
years condemned to rot in the workhouse at the last was repugnant to her, and,
in her book, a challenge for someone to do something about it. Nothing less
could be squared with her conception of the fraternity of the fellowship. So
she did something about it.
Came a day when
a stately lady (described) rather irreverently on one occasion when coming up
the central aisle of a convention hall as resembling a 19th century full-rigged
sailing ship advancing under full sail) stood in the street of a South London
suburb surveying a rather ancient three-story Victorian house having many
rooms. Rose Bush went ahead and bought it. One of her erstwhile hospital
colleagues, Ruth Pressley, a sister in the faith, joined her. The brethren
generally were apprised of the fact that Rose Bush was in the market for gifts of
unwanted furniture and linen. Before long the house was fully furnished. Soon
after that it seemed to be full of residents, elderly people in various stages
of physical decline. This part of the proceedings seems to be somewhat wrapped
in mystery. It used to be said, apocryphically, that the authorities at various
workhouses, going about their legitimate business, suddenly found themselves
confronted by a large and somewhat awe-inspiring apparition and before they
quite knew what was happening found that one of their charges was in a rapidly
receding taxi half-a-mile down the street. This may have been an exaggeration,
but anyone who had known Rose Bush would have no difficulty in giving the story
credence.
The Home for
elderly brethren endured for some twenty years until 1955 when the redoubtable
Rose and her equally redoubtable Ruth had to give up on account of age and
health.
Rose died in
1957 but her memory remains as one who had no patience with protracted
discussions and went out to do things herself.
How the venture
was financed was always a mystery. The "old age pension" of the times
was ludicrously small. Rose Bush used to say that if the Lord wanted the
enterprise to continue He would send the money; her faith was vindicated and He
did.
Various
brethren contributed. It is not likely that she was ever over-burdened with
funds with something like twenty to thirty people to care for. She did the
shopping herself, and the general public got used to the sight of a very large
lady riding a very small bicycle from Croydon market laden front, rear and both
sides with large bags of commodities, at imminent risk of contact with passing
vehicles and meeting disaster on the tramlines. It is certain that a small
detachment of unseen guardian angels must have been deployed on such occasions
keeping the entire complex upright and steering a tolerably straight course.
In Rose Bush’s
book, or course, the fact that they were brethren meant that they must have a meeting.
It was obviously impossible to get them to existing regular meetings or to
conventions, so there had to be a regular meeting in the house. It was equally
impossible to sit bedridden residents in chairs so part of the large room used
for meetings had to be furnished with beds. The one thing no one could ever
find out was how Rose and Ruth got the bedridden ones down the staircase, which
was of the old-fashioned spiral type, from the upper floors. By the time the
invited speaker from some other center had arrived to conduct the meeting, they
were all tucked up and waiting.
Anerley, South
London, was probably the only Bible Student meeting ever where the speaker
faced an audience of listeners in several rows of beds jammed up tightly one
against another. No one ever thought of fire risk and how they could be got out
at short notice, which was just as well for it would not have been possible
anyway. It is certain though that the same detachment of guardian angels which
supervised the shopping expeditions was on duty at meeting times as well.
By 1950,
realizing that Rose Bush would not be here for ever, the Welling group mooted
the idea of a concerted effort to establish a suitable Home for elderly
brethren in line with Government regulations which had recently come into force
for the conduct of such establishments-the old house at Anerley could not by
any means be made to conform to such, although it did in fact subsist for
another five years. A notice of inquiry appeared in the "Monthly" for
November and December 1950 but the proposal, sadly, came to nothing. The
complex regulations now existing for new enterprises of this nature appeared
too formidable-and perhaps there was not enough faith! But in 1975 it was
mooted again, by the original proposers, and this time there was a marked
reversal of sentiment. The usual adverse criticisms were made, but this time
the "ayes" considerably outnumbered the "nays". A
heartening aggregation of moneys was pledged by an appreciable number should
the scheme go ahead; rather embarrassing was the fact that some, in their
enthusiasm for the enterprise, sent monetary gifts before any decision had been
taken, and these had to be banked and recorded in case it later became
necessary to return them. The number who signified their wish to become
residents at such a center seemed to afford promise that the scheme would be
viable, and so early in 1976 the decision was taken to establish such a Home.
The die cast,
the search for a suitable property began. The favored area was to be Dorset and
South Somerset, in the South of England, where the climate was genial, the
winters mild, and, importantly, where property prices were among the lowest in
the country. A team of explorers, five from London and four local who knew the
area, set out, in blissful innocence, at least as far as the Londoners were
concerned, to find a large country house set in several acres of land in the
midst of rolling countryside with a picturesque village not far away, in which
idyllic setting the fortunate brethren could spend their declining years. It is
possible that a mental picture of the future Millennial earth had somehow got a
little mixed up with the ideals which had inspired the pioneers.
Somehow it did
not turn out quite like that. The search endured for two years during which
some forty varied but very fine country houses were inspected by one or other
of the three teams into which the searchers were divided. Starting in the
summer the glories of the countryside where the sun was always shining were
ardently pointed out by the enthusiastic house agents anxious to find a buyer
for any one of the available properties which at that time and in that area
were something of a drug on the market. It was not long before an apparently
suitable property was found, set in three acres of magnificent gardens in a
tiny village nine miles from the nearest town-and, wonder of wonders, it had
been on the market for nine months and no one had yet been to see it. Surely it
had been saved for the searchers!
The Trustees of
the newly formed Bible Fellowship Eventide Trust hastened to offer a price
which exhausted their available funds at the moment and consequently was a
little under the asking price, on the agent’s assurance that the bid would be
accepted-and so it would have been had not some stranger walked in at the last
minute and offered the full price, and the dream faded.
Another house
was found and this was better than the former.
Four acres
instead of three, a greater number of rooms and they were larger. The nearest
town was only two miles away and there was a bus service. A bargain was struck
and the legal formalities put in hand. They would have been completed quite
happily had not the owner of the adjacent property, a retired military man,
conceived a violent antipathy to having what he described as "a lot of
senile old people" living next door. The Trustees felt that life in that
locality might not be too pleasant and it might be prudent to cut losses,
withdraw and look somewhere else.
That somewhere
else proved to be a house in every respect better than either of the other two
and a second set of legal formalities was put in hand. The local landscape was
flat and there was a river not far away but nobody took any notice of that
until a chance word with the local Planning Officer revealed that the river
periodically overflowed its banks and flooded the land for miles around.
Somehow the idea of elderly brethren wading knee-deep in water to reach the
dining room did not seem too appealing, and enthusiasm vanished.