Criticisms OF PASTOR RUSSELL AND THE International
Bible Students Association
EXAMINED FROM A SCRIPTURAL STANDPOINT
Compiled by M. C. Bradley, Chicago August, 1914
PRICE 10 CENTS for special rates in
quantities, see page 82.
Our critics have much to say about what we believe and what we teach. As the "Scripture Studies" have now reached the 8,000,000 mark, and we distribute free, in Chicago alone, more than a Half Million religious newspapers every year, we would concede these to be very proper subjects to consider. Their writings, however, show they do not understand either, for their misstatements are many, some simply ludicrous and others serious, for they misrepresent God’s Word as well as our teachings. We will not charge them with purposely misrepresenting to injure. We remember that Paul for years persecuted the early Christians; and he said he did it through ignorance. Peter declared that the Jews would not have crucified Jesus had they understood the prophecies. And to come nearer our own day, Luther, Wesley, Huss and others have been persecuted because the truths they preached were not understood. Today renowned preachers and theologians would not be persecuting Pastor Russell if they knew he was preaching the Truth. True, they might know it if they would, but as Paul said in 2Co 4:4, "The god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them." And it would seem that many today are so blinded they fail to distinguish truth from error.
No doubt they
think they are doing God service.
No doubt
they fail to realize that their creeds which they blindly believe in and try to
defend without ever having turned the Bible searchlight on them, in some ways
dishonor God and drive from the churches many honest souls who are hungering
for the Bread of Life.
A FAMINE IN
THE LAND.
"I will
send a famine in the land; not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but
of hearing the words of the Lord."-Am 8:11.
And in many
churches today, God’s message of salvation through belief in His dear Son Jesus
who died for our sins, is not so often proclaimed from the pulpit as is
"higher criticism," or a "review" of some "best
seller" in the world of novels.
If the
Ministry have consecrated their all to God, and they have no business to preach
His Word without, then their hearts should be so full of love that they would
never think of condemning or speaking evil of any man, on hearsay evidence.
Their statements prove one of three things: Either they are making their
charges on hearsay evidence, they are purposely misrepresenting, or they do not
understand the Word of God. Those are the only reasons they can give for their
slanders. To claim that everything of their creeds squares with the Bible is to
claim what any reasoning person can easily see is not a fact. And to condemn
Pastor Russell’s teachings as heresy without giving them prayerful, careful
study with the Bible for an interpreter and guide, is contrary to the teachings
of the Bible. So in love we will assume that they have not investigated and are
really ignorant of the International Bible Students Association.
INVESTIGATION
INVITED.
But we court
Investigation for our Society. It will certainly
lead you to
study the Bible as you never did before, and you will find it a priceless mine
of comfort and life to all who come to it in faith and with honest hearts
desiring to know God’s truth. Such will grow in faith and love for God, for
Jesus our Savior, for the brethren, and for the world of mankind. And that, the
Bible teaches us, is the attitude of the Christian.
There are many
honest souls in the world in all denominations, and some outside of
denominations, who are seeking for the Truth and will be satisfied with nothing
less. We think it the proper time to show the difference between what we
believe and teach and what our enemies say we believe. We do not intend to take
up each one of the many ridiculous charges made against us, which we think are
completely answered by our ten articles of belief, but will note some of the
glaring inconsistencies of different writers, state our own position as plainly
as possible, with Bible references, and leave the reader to make his own
decision. If one point of each writer is shown to be incorrect, it naturally
weakens faith in the balance. One reason there are so many today who are
drifting away from the churches is because they have heard ministers question
or speak slightingly of some parts of the Bible, and they reason: "If there
is a doubt about some of the Bible, how do we know any of it is
trustworthy?"
Before taking
up any of the charges made against us for examination, we wish to call your
attention to the fundamental belief of the International Bible Students
Association and our beloved president and teacher, Pastor Charles T. Russell.
We will
therefore review briefly and plainly all the vital points of Bible truth we
hold and teach. Many of them are entirely different from the preaching you have
been used to, but we shall give you the Scripture for every point, that you may
decide as to the reasonableness of our position.
The six volumes
of Scripture Study give more than 5,900 references from the Bible to prove
every point. We do not wish to convince you by our word, but as Peter said:
"We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye
take heed."-2Pe 1:19. Search the Scriptures, for they testify of me, said
Jesus. Again he said in Mt 7:15-18: "Beware of false prophets which come
to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall
know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth
forth evil fruit."
The
International Bible Students Association is willing to be judged by its fruits.
WHICH IS THE TRUE
GOSPEL?
There are today
several hundreds of different religions in the world. Each claims to be right,
yet most of them are willing to admit that people may be Christians-may be
saved-even if they do not belong to their particular
denomination.
Yet we of the International Bible Students Association are denied even this
consideration. It must be evident that someone is making a great mistake. Why
are the noted D. Ds. spending so much time trying to
discredit us
and our work? We would recommend to them the words of a celebrated Doctor,
Gamaliel, who advised more than eighteen hundred years ago, in Ac 5:38, 39,
"I say unto you, refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this
counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought: but if it be of God, ye
cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found to fight even against God."
Let it be thoroughly understood that the writer, the International Bible
Students Association and Pastor Russell are in perfect agreement on all points.
We have no
new doctrine; we believe in the faith once delivered to the Saints, taught by
Jesus and the Apostles.
WHAT THE I. B. S.
A. BELIEVE.
To us the
Scriptures clearly teach:
(1) That the Church
is "the Temple of the Living God" -peculiarly "His
workmanship"; its construction has been in progress throughout the Gospel
Age-ever since Christ became the world’s Redeemer and Chief Corner Stone of His
Temple, through which, when finished, God’s blessing shall come to "all
people," and they find access to Him. -1Co 3:16, 17-"Know ye not that
ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any
man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is
holy, which temple ye are."
Eph
2:20-22-"And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets,
Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; In whom all the building
fitly framed together groweth unto a holy temple in the Lord; in whom ye also
are builded together for a habitation of God through the Spirit."
Ge 28:14-
"And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth; and thou shalt spread
abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in
thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed."
Ga
3:29-"And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs
according to the promise."
(2) That
meantime the chiseling, shaping and polishing of consecrated believers in Christ’s
atonement for sin progresses; and when the last of these "living
stones," "elect and precious," shall have been made ready, the
great Master workman will bring all together in the First Resurrection; and the
Temple shall be filled with His glory, and be the meeting place between God and
men throughout the millennium. -
Re
15:5-8-"And after that I looked, and, behold, the temple of the tabernacle
of the testimony in heaven was opened: And the seven angels came out of the
temple, having the seven plagues, clothed in pure and white linen, and having
their breasts girded with golden girdles. And one of the four beasts gave unto
the seven angels seven golden vials full of the wrath of God, who liveth for
ever and ever. And the temple was filled with smoke from the glory of God, and
from His power: and no man was able to enter into the temple, till the seven
plagues of the seven angels were fulfilled."
(3) That the
Basis of Hope, for the Church and the World, lies in the fact that "Jesus
Christ, by the grace of God, tasted death for every man," " a Ransom
for all," and will be "the true Light which lighteth every man that
cometh into the world," "in due time." -
Heb
2:9-"But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the
suffering of death, crowned with glory and honor; that he by the grace of God
should taste death for every man."
Joh
1:9-"That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh Into
the world."
1Ti 2:5,
6-"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man
Christ Jesus; who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due
time."
(4) That the
Hope of the Church is that she may be like her Lord, "see Him as He
is," be "partaker of the Divine nature," and share His glory as
His joint heir. -
1 Jno.
3:2-"Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what
we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for
we shall see him as he is,"
Joh
17:24-"Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me
where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me; for thou
lovedst me before the foundation of the world."
Ro
8:17-"And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint heirs with
Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified
together."
2Pe
1:4-"Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises; that
by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the
corruption that is in the world through lust."
(5) That the
present mission of the Church is the perfecting of the saints for the future
work of service; to develop in herself every grace; to be God’s witness to the
world; and to prepare to be kings and priests in the next Age. -
Eph
4:12-"For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for
the edifying of the body of Christ."
Mt
24:14-"And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world
for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come."
Re 1:6-"And
hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and
dominion for ever and ever. Amen."
Re
20:6-"Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on
such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God, and of
Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years."
(6) That the
hope for the world lies in the blessings of knowledge and opportunity to be
brought to all by Christ’s Millennial Kingdom-the Restitution of all that was
lost in Adam, to all the willing and obedient, at the hands of their Redeemer
and His glorified Church-when all the willfully wicked will be destroyed. -
Ac
3:19-23-"Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be
blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the
Lord; And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you; Whom
the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God
hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. For
Moses truly said unto the fathers, A Prophet shall the Lord your God raise up
unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things
whatsoever he shall say unto you. And it shall come to pass, that every soul,
which will not hear that Prophet, shall be destroyed from among the
people".
Isa
35-"The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them; and the
desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose. It shall blossom abundantly, and
rejoice even with joy and singing: the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it,
the excellency of Carmel and Sharon; they shall see the glory of the Lord, and
the excellency of our God."
"Strengthen
ye the weak hands, and confirm the feeble knees. Say to them that are of a
fearful heart, Be strong, fear not: behold your God will come with vengeance,
even God with a recompense; he will come and save you. Then the eyes of the
blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped. Then shall
the lame man leap as a hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing: for in the
wilderness shall waters break out, and streams in the desert. And the parched
ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water; in the
habitation of dragons, where each lay, shall be grass with reeds and rushes.
And a highway shall be there, and a way, and it shall be called The way of
holiness; the unclean shall not pass over it; but it shall be for those: the
wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err therein. No lion shall be there, nor
any ravenous beast shall go up thereon, it shall not be found there; but the
redeemed shall walk there: And the ransomed of the Lord shall return, and come
to Zion with songs and everlasting joy upon their heads: they shall obtain joy
and gladness, and sorrow and sighing shall flee away."
(7) We affirm
the pre-existence of Jesus as the mighty, Word (Logos-spokesman) "the
beginning of the creation of God," "the first born of every
creature," the active agent of the Heavenly Father, Jehovah, in all the
work of creation. "Without Him was not anything made that was made."-
Re
3:14-"And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write: These
things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the
creation of God."
Col
1:15-"Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every
creature."
Joh
1:3-"All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made
that was made."
(8) We affirm
that the Word (Logos) was made flesh -became the babe of Bethlehem-thus
becoming the Man Jesus, "holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from
sinners." As we affirm the humanity of Jesus, we equally affirm the
Divinity of Christ-"God also hath highly exalted Him and given Him a name
that is above every name."-
Heb
7:26-"For such a high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled,
separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens."
Php
2:9-"Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name
which is above every name."
(9) We acknowledge
that the personality of the Holy Spirit is the Father and Son, that the Holy
Spirit proceeds from both, and is manifested in all who receive the begetting
of the Holy Spirit and thereby become sons of God. -
Joh
1:13-"Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of
the will of man, but of God."
1Pe
1:3-"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which
according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again into a lively hope by
the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead."
(10) We affirm
the resurrection of Christ-that He was put to death in flesh, but quickened in
Spirit. We deny that He was raised in the flesh, and challenge any statement to
that effect as being unscriptural. -
1Pe
3:18-"For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the
unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but
quickened by the Spirit."
2Co
3:17-"Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is,
there is liberty."
1Co 15:8-"And
last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time."
Ac
26:13-15- "At midday, 0 king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above
the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with
me. And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me,
and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is
hard for thee to kick against the pricks. And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And
he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest."
DOCTRINAL
CRITICISMS.
When a man
begins to get mad, call names and be abusive, instead of giving a sane reason
for his position, it looks as though these were his only weapons, and poor ones
they are.
The
Christian ministry of today seems to be hiding the key of Divine knowledge from
the people, or else they know they have lost it and don’t want to admit it.
PROF. MOOREHEAD.
Prof. W. G.
Moorehead is the author of a little folder entitled "Brief Review of
Millennial Dawn." He says the series of Bible helps are
"anti-Scriptural and a wretched perversion of the Gospel of Christ."
He says: "The books expressly teach that our Lord, prior to His earthly
life, was only a creature, higher indeed in the rank of being than the Angels,
yet like them a created being. * * * Over against this fatal error we set the
majestic words of the inspired John, 1:1: "In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God and the Word was God."
Like all
Trinitarians, Rev. Mr. Moorehead refers to Joh 1:1 to prove his position. As
the exact, literal meaning of the first verse is very different from what he
gives, which is the rendering of our Common Version Bible, we will give the
accurate- word for word translation of the original, which Prof. Moorehead
knows to be correct. Why does he try to hide it? Joh 1:1-"In a beginning
was the Word and the Word was with the God, and a God was the Word." Jesus
was a God, but not the God, Jehovah. Presumably he can’t bear the thought of
admitting himself wrong and Pastor Russell right.
As long as he
believes that the Father and Son are one God, he of course must assume as he
does that Jesus had no creation. What
does the Bible say? In Re 3:14 Jesus
calls himself "the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the
creation of God." Col 1:15
—speaking of Jesus—says: "Who is the image of the Invisible God, the
firstborn of every creature." Joh
1:3 "All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made
that was made."
Eph 3:9-2
-"God, who created all things by Jesus Christ."
This is a fair
sample of the way he "disposes" of Pastor Russell’s teachings. He
does not seem to have read them, or to have any comprehension of Gods plan as
so thoroughly outlined in the Bible.
"Search
the Scriptures for they testify of me," were the words of Jesus in Joh
5:39. What is Scripture given for? "That the man of God may be Perfect,
thoroughly furnished unto all good works."- 2Ti 3:17,
He says:
"The prophets uniformly testify that the Messiah who was to come should be
Jehovah, the great God, Himself, and no other."- Isa 9:6, 40:3-, Jer 23:6;
Mal 3:1.
Isa 9:6 makes
no mention whatever of Jehovah. 40:3 does speak or Jehovah, but not of
Jesus. Surely a man who has been at the
head of a theological college must know that in the Old Testament, LORD, in
small capitals, as in Isa 40:3, always refers, not to Jesus, but to Jehovah,
and should be so translated. In Mal 3:1
the first Lord in the verse refers to Jesus, the last LORD to Jehovah. Regarding
Jer 23:6 we quote page 42, vol. 5, Scripture Studies:
"The text
chiefly relied on to prove that Jehovah may properly be considered the name of
Christ Jesus reads, ‘I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King
shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. *
11 * And this is the name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR
RIGHTEOUSNESS.’ -Jer 23:5, 6.
"Evidently
our Lord Jesus and his Millennial reign are referred to, and the name in the
Hebrew is Jehovah Tsidkenu. What is the explanation? Merely this: the
translators, in their zeal to find a place where the name Jehovah was
associated with Jesus as a name, have given us a poor translation. No
difficulty would appear if it had been translated-’This is the name with which
he shall be called, Our Righteousness of Jehovah.’ And how appropriate is this name to the work and office of our
Lord Jesus. Did he not stand as the
representative of God’s righteousness and suffer the penalty of Justice as
man’s ransom-that God might be just and yet be the justifier of him that
believeth in Jesus? Surely no name
could be more appropriate.
"It should
not be overlooked that this same name precisely, Jehovah Tsidkenu, occurs again
in the writings of the same Prophet. But our friends never call attention to
it, and the translators, although rendering it by the same English words, do
not put those words in large capital letters as in the other case. Why?
Because the connections show that Jehovah Tsidkenu will be the name of
the entire Church, the new Jerusalem; —’And this is the name wherewith she
shall be called [Jehovah Tsidkenu], our Righteousness of Jehovah.’ -Jer 33:16.
"And that
this name will be appropriate to the glorified Church all can readily see: she
not only shares her Lord’s sufferings for righteousness, ‘filling up that which
is behind of the afflictions of Christ’ (Col 1:24; 1Pe 5:9), but is also
promised a share in all the glories of her Lord, as a wife shares her husband’s
honors and name."
We wonder what
theological students study; it does not
seem to be
the Bible. Now, with the multitudinous
helps for Bible study, we common people may, if we will, compare the doctrines
of the dark ages with the truths of the Bible, which many theologians do not
understand or else purposely misrepresent, and neither horn of the dilemma is
creditable to them. The time is past when a theological course is necessary to
an understanding of the Bible, though it might almost seem to be necessary to a
misunderstanding. What is necessary is the Holy Spirit and "He shall guide
you into all truth."-Joh l6:13.
P. BECKMAN.
P. Beckman
has printed a book in Swedish on what he calls "Russell’s God-sent
Delusions." He wants his readers to be well armed lest they believe a
lie. He says: "Faith in Russell
robs a man of any possibility of true conversion." This book is error from
beginning to end, and the different points he seeks to make we have covered
elsewhere.
C. C. COOK.
C. C. Cook, On
Page 47 of his book, says: ‘The Bible tells no more at first, second or any other
chance beyond the grave than it tells of a Romish purgatory-that is, not a
word."
Let us see: 1Ti
2:5, 6 says: "The man Christ Jesus; who gave himself a ransom for all, to
be testified in due time."
"That was
the true light that lighteth every man that cometh into the world." -Joh
1:9.
"He is the
propitiation for our sins (the Church’s) *** and for the sins of the whole
world." -1Jo 2:2.
"The Lord
is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is long
suffering to us-ward, not willing ‘that any should perish, but that all should
come to repentance." -2Pe 3:9.
"No man
can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise
him up at the last day. It is written in the Prophets, And they shall be all
taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the
Father, cometh unto me." -Joh 6:44, 45.
"I would
not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be
wise in your own conceits, that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until
the fullness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be
saved." -Ro 11:25, 26.
"After
this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is
fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon
whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things. Known unto
God are all his works from the beginning of the world." -Ac 15:16-18.
"When thy
sisters, Sodom and her daughters, shall return to their former estate, and
Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former estate, then thou and
thy daughters shall return to your former estate." -Eze 16:55.
"If we sin
willfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there
rernaineth no more sacrifice for sins, but a fearful looking for of judgment
and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries." -Heb 10:26,
27.
The several
pointed facts to be learned from these quotations are:
1. The Ransom
Sacrifice of Jesus was given for all men.
2. As Jesus
died for all, all must receive an opportunity for eternal life and blessing,
3. It is the
Father’s wish that all should accept, but He will not use compulsion; we may
accept or not, as we choose.
4. We must have
a knowledge of Jesus before we can come to him and accept the promised
salvation.
5. As God has a
time for everything, so in "due time" all must have that knowledge and
decide for themselves the question of life or death.
6. The
wickedness of Sodom will not prevent them from returning in due time.
7. But while
guaranteed one chance, we are equally assured none will have two chances.
Now, Mr.
Cook, granting for the sake of the argument that the preaching of the nominal
churches of today is sufficient for salvation, knowing as you do that millions
have died with absolutely no knowledge of God or of Jesus their Savior, after
reading those statements from God’s Word, are you prepared to repeat your
declaration? If they had no chance
while alive, and they are guaranteed one chance through the merit of Jesus’
death, then when will they get it if not after their resurrection?
REV. W. LEON
TUCKER
calls it:
"Russellism, the Satanic success of the last two decades."
Again he says,
on page 19: "We are told In Vol. 1, page 150: ‘The ransom for all, given
by the man Jesus Christ, does not give or guarantee everlasting life or
blessing to any man.’ Does this sound like Joh 5:24? Russellism cares no more
for the cross than does the devil!"
We will now
quote Vol. 1, page 150:
"He ‘gave
himself a ransom [a corresponding price] for all,’ in order that he might bless
all, and give to every man an individual trial for life. To claim that he gave ‘ransom for all,’ and
yet to claim that only a mere handful of the ransomed ones will ever receive
any benefit from it, is absurd; for it would imply either that God accepted the
ransom-price and then unjustly refused to grant the release of the redeemed, or
else that the Lord, after redeeming all, was either unable or unwilling to
carry out the original benevolent design. The unchangeableness of the divine
plans, no less than the perfection of the divine justice and love, repels and contradicts
such a thought, and gives us assurance that the original and benevolent plan,
of which the ‘ransom for all’ was the basis, will be fully carried out in God’s
‘due time,’ and will bring to faithful believers the blessing of release from
the Adamic condemnation and an opportunity to return to the rights and
liberties of sons of God, as enjoyed before sin and the curse.
"Let the
actual benefits and results of the ransom be clearly seen, and all objections
to it being of universal application must vanish. The ‘ransom for all’ given by
‘the man Christ Jesus’ does not give or guarantee everlasting life or blessing
to any man; but it does guarantee to every man another opportunity or trial for
life everlasting. The first trial of man, which resulted in the loss of the
blessings at first conferred, is really turned into a blessing of experience to
the loyal-hearted, by reason of the ransom which God has provided. But the fact
that men are ransomed from the first penalty does not guarantee that they may not,
when individually tried for everlasting life, fail to render the obedience
without which none will be permitted to live everlastingly."
Also one
paragraph from page 152:
"The
ransom given does not excuse sin in any; it does not propose to count sinners
as saints, and usher them thus into everlasting bliss. It merely releases the
accepting sinner from the first condemnation and its results, both direct and
indirect, and places him again on trial for life, in which trial his own
willful obedience or willful disobedience will decide whether he may or may not
have life everlasting."
Jesus said In
Mt 12:35-37:
"A
good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an
evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. But I say unto
you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof
in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy
words thou shalt be condemned."
REV. I. M.
HALDEMAN, D. D.
Rev. 1. M.
Haldeman, a noted preacher of the Baptist denomination, in a bitter attack on
Pastor Russell, claims to make 24 points on what he is pleased to call
"The wicked and blasphemous system which teaches the annihilation of our
Lord Jesus Christ," as follows:
1. It denies
the doctrine of the Trinity.
2. It denies
that Jesus Christ was God before his incarnation.
3. It teaches
that Christ was only a created spirit.
4. In
incarnation he ceased to be a spirit and became the second Adam.
5. As the
second Adam he had only one nature.
6. His nature
of humanity was annihilated on the cross.
7. He did not
rise in the body in which he died.
8. The body in
which he died may have been dissolved into gas.
9. The body in
which he appeared after death was nothing more than a momentarily materialized
appearance which was finally dissolved.
10. Jesus
Christ is not now a man.
11. The
"Man Christ Jesus" no longer exists.
12. Jesus Christ
is now an invisible spirit being.
13. He came to
the world in 1874 as an invisible spirit being.
14. The
Millennium will begin in 1914.
15. All the
dead out of Christ will be raised at that time.
16. All the
unrighteous and wicked dead will be raised and made perfect and innocent like
Adam before the fall.
17. All the
unrighteous and wicked dead will be given a second chance.
18. The more
wicked they have been in this life, the more likely they will be, through the
"experience" of sin, to accept the Gospel of the second chance.
19. Those who
accept the second chance will have everlasting life.
20. Those who
get everlasting life will sustain it by eating food.
21. Those who
do not want to live forever will have the privilege of being asphyxiated in the
lake of fire.
22. The
assurance given to the wicked and sinful is, that there is no suffering for
sin.
23. Those who
do not care for heaven, need not be afraid of hell.
24. The finally
impenitent are extinguished here, and annihilated hereafter."
He says:
1. "It
denies the doctrine of the Trinity."
Yes, most
assuredly, and so does Paul deny the Trinity. In 1Co 8:6 he says: "To us
there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one
Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him."
2. "It
denies that Jesus Christ was God before his incarnation."
We affirm
that Jesus was a God, but not the God Jehovah. We quote from Scripture Studies,
Vol. 5, pages 54-62.
"A TRADITION
OF THE FATHERS SUPPORTED BY A FORGERY- AN INTERPOLATION."
"We are
leaving to following chapters for consideration the greatness and worthiness of
our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom the entire work of Atonement has been and
will be accomplished; -and the great honor bestowed upon him, not only since he
redeemed the world, but also the great honor and dignity which were his before
he became the world’s Redeemer. We are now seeking to distinguish clearly
something respecting the great Author of the plan: but inasmuch as the general
thought of Christendom is greatly perplexed by what is known as ‘The doctrine
of the Trinity,’ a doctrine which its most pronounced advocates admit they do
not understand and cannot comprehend or explain, therefore it is appropriate
that we here examine those texts of the Scripture which are supposed to give
some color or support to this confusing doctrine of men, for which no authority
can be found in the Word of God. We have already called attention to various
Scriptures which emphatically state that there is but one Almighty God-not two,
nor three, nor more. We now call attention to the fact that the word ‘Trinity’
does not occur in the Scriptures; nor does any word occur there of equivalent
meaning; nor is any statement made which even unreasonably could be interpreted
to signify any such thing. Indeed, those who hold to the doctrine of the
Trinity, in attempting to explain their own thought, hopelessly entangle
themselves, as well as their hearers. They declare in one breath that there is
only one God (because the Scriptures so positively emphasize this point that it
cannot be ignored), yet in the same breath they declare that there are three
Gods (because to this theory they are committed by ‘traditions of the fathers’
handed down from earliest Papacy).
"But how
could there be three Gods and yet only one God? If there are three Gods, ‘equal
in power and in glory,’ as the catechisms declare, then it is untrue to say
there is only one God. If there is only ‘One God, the
Father, of whom
are all things,’ as St. Paul asserts; and if, as Jesus declared, the Father is
greater than his honored Son; and if the Father raised his Beloved Son from the
dead, and exalted him on high, honored him, and has appointed for him a
Kingdom; and if ultimately the Son will deliver up the Kingdom again to the
Father, that the Father may be all in all; then it cannot be true that there
are several Gods of equal power. Nevertheless, we shall show conclusively in
the succeeding chapter that our Lord Jesus Christ is a God, but that, while he
is to be honored even as the Father is honored, and that in honoring him we
honor the Father who exalted him, still the united voice of the Scriptures most
emphatically assert that there is but one Almighty God, the Father of all. As
the Apostle declares, ‘The head of the woman is the man, the head of man is
Christ, and the head of Christ is God. -1Co 11:3.
"There is
one statement found in the Scriptures, and only one, which seems in the
slightest degree to even imply the doctrine of a Trinity of Gods; and that
passage is now admitted by all scholars to be spurious, —an interpolation.
It is therefore
omitted from the Revised Version of the New Testament, although the translators
of that Revised Version, so far as we are aware, were every on of them
Trinitarians. While they would have liked to retain this passage, as the only
Scripture support (and then very imperfect in statement), they could not retain
it conscientiously.
"Nor were
the translators of our Common Version of the Bible blameworthy for inserting
this interpolation, because at the time of that translation it was impossible
to know of its spurious character. Since its translation hundreds of old Greek manuscripts have been
found, but none of these of earlier date than the seventh century contains this
clause, which favors the Trinity. It is therefore not denied by scholars,
without respect to denominational proclivities, that the spurious words were
inserted to give support to the doctrine of the Trinity, at a time when the
discussion of that doctrine was rife in the Church, and when the advocates of
the doctrine of the Trinity were perplexed before their opponents, because they
had no Scriptural evidence to bring in substantiation of their theory. The spurious
words were no doubt interpolated by some over-zealous monk, who felt sure of
the doctrine himself, and thought that the Holy Scriptures blundered not
stating the matter in the Scriptures: his intention, no doubt, was to help God
and the truth out of a difficulty by perpetrating a fraud. But all such
suggestions, to the effect that God has not given us a complete revelation,
‘sufficient that the man of God may be thoroughly furnished,’ and that it needs
adding to, are of the Adversary, as was this suggestion that it would be proper
to commit a wrong, a forgery, for the sake of doing good, and rectifying the
mistake of the Almighty. The monk scribe or Priest who committed this forgery,
apparently about the beginning of the seventh century, has much to answer for,
in his addition to the Word of God, and the evil influence which it has exerted
over God’s people, who, seeking for the truth on this subject, were misled by
his forgery.
"The
spurious interpolation is found in 1Jo 5:7, and consists of the words ‘in
heaven the Father, the Word and the holy Spirit, and these three are one. And
there are three that bear witness in earth." These words omitted from the
text, leave it simple and easy to be understood, and fully in accord with all
the remainder of the Scriptures; but with these words in the text, as they have
stood for centuries, confusion is produced; for nonsense is asserted. For
instance, with these words remaining in the text, the sense would be that the
Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit agreed in bearing one testimony in
heaven, namely, that Jesus is the Christ. How absurd! Who is there in heaven
ignorant of the fact that Jesus is the Christ? To whom, therefore, would it be
necessary for the Father, the Son and the holy Spirit to bear this record or
testimony? None. But it was a convenient place for the Adversary to get in his
work of corruption of the truth, and he found a servant willing to serve him.
"Not only
does the Revised Version omit this verse, but so also do all modern
translations-the Emphatic Diaglott, Young’s Bible, translation, the American
Bible Union translation, the Improved Version. The latter says:
"This text
concerning the Heavenly Witnesses is not contained in any Greek MS. which was
written earlier than the fifth century. It is not cited by any of the Greek
ecclesiastical writers; nor by any of the early Latin fathers, even when the
subjects upon which they treated would naturally have led them to appeal to its
authority: it is, therefore, evidently spurious."
Lang’s Critical
Commentary, referring to this spurious passage, says:
"Said
words are wanting in all the Greek codices; also in the Codex Sinaiticus [the
oldest known Greek MS.], and in all the ancient versions, including the Latin,
as late as the eighth century; and [in MSS. written] since that time they are
found in three variations. Notwithstanding the Trinitarian controversies, they
are not referred to by a single Greek Father, or by any of the old Latin Church
Fathers."
Hudson’s Greek
and English Concordance says:
"The words
are found in no Greek MS. before the 15tb or 16th century, and in no early
version."
The passage is
pronounced an interpolation by the following Bible scholars of recognized
ability: Sir Isaac Newton, Benson, Clark, Horne, Griesbach, Tischendorf,
Tregelles, Lachman and Alford. The latter says:
"Unless
pure caprice is to be followed in the criticism of the sacred text, there is no
shadow of reason for supposing them genuine."
Dr. Constantine
Tischendorf says:
"That this
spurious addition should continue to be published as a part of the Epistle I
regard as an impiety."
Prof. T. B.
Wolsey inquires:
"Do not
truth and honesty require that such a passage should be struck out of our
English Bibles-a passage which Luther would not express in his translation, and
which did not creep into the German Bible until nearly fifty years after his
death?"
Dr. Adam
Clarke, commenting on this passage, says:
"It is
likely this verse is not genuine. It is wanting in every MS. of this epistle
written before the invention of printing, one excepted-the Codex Montfortii, in
Trinity College, Dublin. The others which omit this verse amount to one hundred
and twelve. It is wanting in both the Syriac, all the Arabic, Ethiopic, Coptic,
Sahadic, Arminian, Slavonic, etc.; in a word, in all the ancient versions but
the Vulgate; and even of this version, many of the most ancient and correct
copies have it not. It is wanting also in all the ancient Greek Fathers, and in
most even of the Latin."
John
Wesley, the founder of Methodism, endeavored to support the doctrine of the
Trinity, yet in one of his sermons from this text he quoted the words of
Servetus: "I scruple using the words ‘trinity’ and ‘persons’ because I do
not find those terms in the Bible" -and to this quotation Wesley added,
"I would insist only on the direct words, unexplained, as they lie in the
text." He labored to prove the doctrine of the Trinity, because he
believed this spurious passage was genuine, positive information from the ancient
MSS. of the Bible being of recent acquisition. For instance, at the time of the
preparation of our King James or Common Version Bible (A. D. 1611), the
translators had the advantage of but eight Greek MSS., and none of those of
earlier date than the tenth century. Now, however, there are about seven
hundred MSS., some of which, especially the Sinaitic MS. and the Vatican MS.
No. 1209, are very old, reaching back to about A. D. 350.
"THE
SCRIPTURE TEACHING RESPECTING THE FATHER AND THE SON AND THEIR UNITY."
"A sharp
distinction should be drawn between a confession of faith in a Trinity and a
confession of faith in the Unity of the heavenly Father, Jehovah, and the
heavenly Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, and the holy Spirit. The doctrine of the Trinity
holds that the Father, the Son and the holy Spirit ‘are one in person, equal in
glory and in power,’ as stated in the Church creeds. The Bible, while showing
the absolute Unity between the Father and Son and holy Spirit in the various
steps of the great plan of salvation, most positively contradicts the thought
that the Father and Son are one in person, denies that they are equal in
majesty and in power, except as before shown, that the Father has glorified the
Son, has highly exalted him and given him a name above all others except his
own, making him his agent and representative in the exercise of ‘all power in
heaven and in earth.’ All the various Scriptures agree in their statements to
the effect that the Father sent the Son into the world; and that the Son, for
the joy set before him by the Father, endured the cross, and despised the
shame: and that he was the heavenly Father’s first and only begotten Son; and
that after he shall have accomplished the work which the Father has given him
to do, he shall deliver up the Kingdom of earth, at the close of the Millennial
Age, to the Father: and the additional statements already called to attention,
in which the Son cheerfully and fully acknowledges that he ‘came forth from the
Father,’ that he ‘came not to do his own will’ but the Father’s will; and that
the power he used was not his own power, but the Father’s power; also his
statement, ‘The Father is greater than I,’ and the declaration of the prophecy,
that he is the Messenger or servant of the Covenant, and not the Maker of the
Covenant; together with the repeated declarations of the New Testament
Scriptures, that he is the Mediator of the New Covenant, -the one Mediator
between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself a ransom for all."
These various Scriptures all consistently and harmoniously teach a distinction
of person and glory and power as between the heavenly Father and the heavenly
Son; but a most absolute and profound unity of plan, will, purpose; for the Son
was worthy to be the executor of the great plan of Jehovah, because he had no
will of his own, but renounced his own will that he might be filled with the
Father’s spirit and do his will in every particular. -Joh 6:38, 39.
"Moreover,
the very words ‘Father’ and ‘Son’ imply a difference, and contradict the
thoughts of the Trinity and oneness of person, because the word ‘father’
signifies life-giver, while the word ‘son’ signifies the one who has received
life from another. The heavenly Father received life from no one; he is the
fountain, the source of life, not only to our Lord Jesus, his only begotten
Son, but through him the source of life to all others of his creatures, And all
this is fully in accord with the Scripture which stands at the head of this
chapter, in which the Apostle, plainly denies that the Father and the Son are
one in person or in power, saying, ‘To us there is one God, the Father, of whom
are all things * * * and one Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things.’
"The
thoughtful reader will at once recognize the Scriptural harmony and simplicity
of the view herein presented, while all will admit that the doctrine of the
Trinity is impossible, of reasonable understanding or explanation. its most
earnest advocates admit this, and instead of endeavoring to do the impossible
thing of explaining it, they avoid discussion, claiming that it’s ‘a great
mystery,’ unexplainable. But, strange to say, this doctrine, of three Gods in
one God, which not only has no Scriptural support, but is opposed by the
Scriptures from Genesis to Revelation, both directly and indirectly, and which
is so opposed to reason as to be unreasonable, is nevertheless a strongly
entrenched doctrine amongst Christians, even amongst Protestants-those who
profess faith in the Bible and to protest against any teachings not found
therein. Why is this? We answer, that it is one of the dark mysteries by which
Satan, through the Papacy, has beclouded the Word and character and plan of
God.
"As it is
written, ‘The god of this world hath blinded the minds of them that believe
not, lest light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God,
should shine unto them.’ -2Co 4:4. He has put upon the poor world utter
blindness and doctrinal vails, darkening counsel and falsifying mysteries, to
hinder those who have found the Lord from coming to a clear knowledge of thc
truth.
"But how
would Satan be interested in adding to the luster of the glory of our Lord
Jesus Christ? Would it not rather be his work to detract from the glory of
Christ? We answer, that it has always been Satan’s policy to misrepresent the
truth, to misrepresent the Bible, and to make its teachings appear unreasonable
and self-contradictory, in order to hinder mankind from seeing the great beauty
and reasonableness and harmony which inhere in the divine plan and the Word.
The more absurdities Satan can get interwoven into man’s views respecting the
Creator, the better he will succeed in separating from the service of God those
who are of reasonable and logical mind; and proportionately the more
unreasonable he succeeds in making the creeds of men, the more does he destroy
real faith amongst those who advocate those creeds, and the more he does to
favor mere credulity, instead of genuine faith.
"Thus for
centuries the great Adversary has been working most successfully to rid the
Church of all the most reasonably disposed, and to gather into it the more
credulous and superstitious and unreasoning class. He has covered and hidden
some of the most precious truths under the most specious and repulsive errors,
and the progress of the Lord’s people has been correspondingly slow. But, thank
God, we are now living in the time when the vail of ignorance is being
dissolved, and when the Lord’s people are learning to look away from the creeds
formed for their enslavement during the dark ages, and to look directly to the
Word of God itself. But, alas, this comes too late for many, especially the
worldly wise: they have already so associated the creeds with the Bible that,
in rejecting the former they are rejecting the latter also; and instead of
seeking true light from the Word of God, they are more inclined to ignore or
reject it and to lean to their own understandings, —to human philosophies.
"Hence it
is that Higher Criticism, Evolution, Christian Science, Theosophy and other
Bible-denying theories are today making rapid progress; while the old creeds
are falling to pieces or being abandoned. Only the comparatively few have
learned that the mistake is not in the Bible, but in the creeds, and are seeking
the ‘old paths,’ and ‘the faith once delivered unto the saints.’ -Jer 6:16;
Jude 3."
3. "It
teaches that Christ was only a created spirit."
In Re 3:14
Jesus said of himself that he "was the beginning of the creation of
God." We would rather take the word of our Savior for it than Dr.
Haldeman’s against it.
He says we
claim that "Jesus did not rise in the body
in which lie
died." "That the ‘Man Christ
Jesus’ no longer exists."
Why should Dr.
Haldeman or anyone else be so anxious to take these poor old bodies to heaven,
when we have the assurance of the Bible that no man ever went there, that flesh
and blood cannot go there, and that God in the resurrection will give us
glorious spirit bodies as pleaseth Him, and then we too shall be like our Lord.
"No man
hath ascended up to heaven." -Joh 3:13.
"Flesh and
blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God."-1Co 15:50; Php 3:20, 21.
"We look for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ: who shall change our vile
body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body."
Dr. Haldeman
says on pages 5 and 6 of his book that what we teach is "The poison of
subtly distilled blasphemy.
It blasphemes
the person of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The supreme theme
of the Bible is not the Jew, the Gentile, nor the Church of God; it is neither
salvation nor damnation: its one theme is-The Person of Christ. * * * He was
God. * * * From unbegun eternity he was the Son of God, and, therefore, God the
Son. At a given moment he bent down and took of the substance of the Virgin
Mary, the seed of the woman, and created for himself a new and distinct human
nature, consisting of a real body and a rational soul, and, uniting it to his
eternal and uncaused personality, walked through this earth, ‘without
controversy the mystery of Godliness,’ God manifest in the flesh-true God and
real man-being one person with two natures; so that the blood be shed was the
blood of God."
What logic! If
we should insist that because for 56 years we had been the son of our father,
that, therefore, we were now our own father, it would be the same kind of
"proof" he gives. There can be nothing found in the religion of the
most depraved heathen any more absurd, any more at variance with the real
teachings of the Bible, than the doctrine of the Trinity. It has no Biblical
foundation whatever, it is wholly man-made.
The Bible does
not teach that it was the blood of God that ransomed us, but in many places it
teaches, as in 1Jo 1:7, Revised Version: "The blood of Jesus his Son
cleanseth us from all sin." The Doctor has gotten all tangled up in his
own theology, so that he makes a ridiculous mess of it. He insists that Jesus
was a Divine being while on earth and then was "the man Christ Jesus"
after he went to heaven. We have several translations of the ‘Bible, but to us
they all teach just the reverse of this.
The
following quotations from Scripture Studies, Vol. 5, pages 81-96, fully
explains the Scriptural teaching on this great subject:
STUDY III.
THE MEDIATOR
OF THE ATONEMENT.
THE ONLY BEGOTTEN
ONE.
"There is
one God, and one Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave
himself a ransom." -1Ti 2:5, 6.
"In
proportion as we value the work of the Atonement-our reconciliation to God, and
the sacrifice for sin through which it is accomplished-in the same proportion
will we esteem him whom the Heavenly Father set forth to be the propitiation
for our sins, our Restorer and Lifegiver. Hence, in approaching the question, Who
is this great One whom Jehovah God has so highly honored, and who, by the grace
of God, is our Redeemer and Savior?
It is befitting
that we realize, first of all, our own ignorance of the subject, and our
incompetency to reach a conclusion except as the divine Word shall instruct us.